AI code review comparison
CodeRabbit vs Greptile
CodeRabbit (PR reviews, CLI, and IDE) against Greptile (Full-repo context PR review). Billing, hourly throughput, hosts, autofix, and merge-gate claims are dated August 16, 2026.
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit
PR reviews, CLI, and IDE
Greptile
Greptile
Full-repo context PR review
| Specification | CodeRabbit | Greptile |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | CodeRabbit | Greptile |
| Git hosts | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps | GitHub, GitLab |
| Surface | PR reviews, CLI, and IDE | Full-repo context PR review |
| Billing model | Per seat | Hybrid |
| Hourly / throughput | 1–12/hour by plan (per developer) | Credits, not hourly |
| Trial | 14-day Pro+ trial, no card. Trial throughput is 3 PR/IDE/CLI reviews per developer per hour — not the paid Pro+ 10/hour. Trial also caps 300 files per PR, 10 linked repos, 20 custom finishing-touch recipes, and 20 custom pre-merge checks. | 14-day Pro trial. |
| Config / rules | CodeRabbit YAML / dashboard (reviews.auto_review and related) | Custom rules (Pro) |
| Inline comment cap | Not verified | Not verified |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | Yes |
| CI hosts | Not a separate CI product | Not a separate CI product |
| Autofix | Yes | Not verified |
| Merge gate | Yes | Not verified |
| Free for qualifying OSS | Yes | Yes |
Catalog checked August 16, 2026. Dollar figures and merge-gate behaviour should be re-read on the vendor pricing page before a contract.
CodeRabbit
The broadest dedicated reviewer: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps, plus CLI and IDE loops around the PR comment.
Best for
- Teams on mixed git hosts
- Orgs that want a dedicated reviewer with linters and issue trackers attached
- Open-source maintainers who want free public-repo reviews
Watch out
Per-seat pricing scales with PR authors, not with workspace. Pro’s hourly review cap is 5 per developer. Security scanning and Slack agent are billed separately. Confirm monthly vs annual toggle before quoting $24.
Greptile
The full-codebase reviewer: it spends credits to keep a graph of the repo, which is the point when bugs live in call sites the diff does not show.
Best for
- Teams whose defects are cross-file, not line-local
- Solo developers who can live on the free 50-credit Starter cap
- Early-stage startups that qualify for the 50% discount
Watch out
Credits run out: 50 standard reviews per seat, then $1 each, and TREX burns three credits. GitHub and GitLab only on the public pricing page. Confirm TREX vs standard before comparing catch-rate anecdotes from third-party blogs.
Common questions
CodeRabbit vs Greptile questions
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Where do CodeRabbit and Greptile run?
CodeRabbit runs as pr reviews, cli, and ide on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps. Greptile runs as full-repo context pr review on GitHub, GitLab.
How do CodeRabbit and Greptile bill?
CodeRabbit: Pro $24/user/month billed annually ($30 month-to-month); Pro Plus $48/user/month billed annually ($60 month-to-month); Enterprise custom. 14-day Pro+ trial, no card. Seats are billed for developers who create PRs, or assigned manually. Public repositories are free. Separate Security add-on $40/user/month; Slack agent $0.50 per agent minute. Greptile: Starter: free, 1 active developer, 50 credits/month. Pro: $30/seat/month, 50 credits included per seat, then $1 per extra credit. 1 credit = 1 standard review; 3 credits = 1 TREX review. A seat is any developer who received a Greptile review in that billing period. 14-day Pro trial. Free for qualified MIT/Apache non-commercial OSS. 50% off for pre-Series A startups under $2M trailing-12-month revenue.
What is the hourly or throughput limit for CodeRabbit vs Greptile?
CodeRabbit: Rolling per-developer hour, not a workspace bucket: Free 1 PR review/hour; default 14-day Pro+ trial 3/hour; Pro 5/hour; Pro+ 10/hour; Enterprise 12/hour. OSS public repos 1–10/hour by popularity. Incremental reviews after pushes count. Files per review (after path filters): Free/Pro 150, Pro+/Enterprise 300. Fair-usage can slow a developer at the 95th percentile of recent 7-day usage. A usage-based add-on can continue eligible over-limit reviews. @coderabbitai rate limit shows remaining capacity. Greptile: No published hourly cap. Starter: 50 credits/month for one active developer. Pro: 50 credits included per seat/month, then $1 per extra credit. One standard review uses 1 credit; one TREX review uses 3.
Can CodeRabbit or Greptile apply fixes?
CodeRabbit: Yes. Greptile: Not verified. Autofix is still a suggestion until your CI and humans accept it.
Can CodeRabbit or Greptile block a merge?
CodeRabbit: Yes. Greptile: Not verified. A missing verification means we did not treat marketing copy as a merge-gate claim.
Should I choose CodeRabbit or Greptile?
Choose CodeRabbit if this matches: Teams on mixed git hosts. Orgs that want a dedicated reviewer with linters and issue trackers attached. Open-source maintainers who want free public-repo reviews. Choose Greptile if this matches: Teams whose defects are cross-file, not line-local. Solo developers who can live on the free 50-credit Starter cap. Early-stage startups that qualify for the 50% discount. CodeRabbit watch-out: Per-seat pricing scales with PR authors, not with workspace. Pro’s hourly review cap is 5 per developer. Security scanning and Slack agent are billed separately. Confirm monthly vs annual toggle before quoting $24. Greptile watch-out: Credits run out: 50 standard reviews per seat, then $1 each, and TREX burns three credits. GitHub and GitLab only on the public pricing page. Confirm TREX vs standard before comparing catch-rate anecdotes from third-party blogs.