CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit
A dedicated reviewer for GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps, plus CLI and IDE loops around the PR comment.
Checked
AI code review
AI Choice Engine compares GitHub-app and bundled PR reviewers on billing, throughput, git hosts, autofix, merge gates, and dated caveats. Unverified prices stay labelled. The Cursor editor itself is compared with the coding tools.
Newest profile source check . Each product retains its own check date below.
These products comment on pull requests. They are not coding harnesses. Compare Cursor, Claude Code, and Copilot as editors/agents, then come back here if you still need a dedicated reviewer. They also sit on top of model APIs — for the models themselves see model comparisons, and for task-first buying advice see AI guides. Other dedicated reviewers (for example Sourcery and Ellipsis) are not in this catalog yet.
Essentials (formerly Pro) $24/user/month billed annually ($30 month-to-month); Team (formerly Pro Plus) $48/user/month billed annually ($60 month-to-month). Advanced adds blast-radius and architectural-impact analysis, security review on every PR, and continuous security monitoring; its current price was not visible in the public source capture. Enterprise is custom. All plans advertise a 14-day free trial with no card. Seats are billed for developers who create PRs, or assigned manually. Public repositories have free reviews with separate eligibility and usage limits. CodeRabbit Security Scan is usage-based; CodeRabbit Agent is $0.40 per agent minute; eligible over-limit reviews can continue at $0.25 per reviewed file.
Pro Team uses pooled workspace credits, not per-seat billing: $0.012/credit, with a $30 2,500-credit pack (~18 reviews/month by Qodo's estimate); 5,000 and 20,000 credits are estimated at ~36/~144 reviews. The pricing page markets Pro Team for up to 30 users and Enterprise for 30+, while the billing docs describe unlimited Pro Teams users; confirm the selected workspace's entitlement. Monthly billing, no annual self-serve commitment. Credits expire monthly without rollover; overage uses the same credit rate up to a customer-set cap. The 14-day trial has unlimited credits and no card. Enterprise adds SSO, BYOK, single-tenant or on-premises deployment. No permanent free tier; qualified OSS projects can apply for free access.
Starter: free, 1 active developer, 50 credits/month. Pro: $30/seat/month, 50 credits included per seat, then $1 per extra credit. Review tiers: Base (1 credit), Plus (3 credits), Apex (10 credits). A seat is any developer who received a Greptile review in that billing period. 14-day Pro trial. Free for qualified MIT/Apache non-commercial OSS. 50% off for pre-Series A startups under $2M trailing-12-month revenue.
Core $20/user/month billed annually ($25 monthly); Pro $40/user/month billed annually ($50 monthly); both capped at 50 users. Enterprise is custom and outcome-based per PR, with unlimited users, custom agreements, bring-your-own Anthropic key, and support for self-hosted code-hosting systems. Pricing now lives on sonarsource.com. 14-day Pro trial, no card. Public GitHub/GitLab repos with an OSI-approved licence can apply for free Pro features. PR summaries are included in Core and higher plans. Merge blocking is Pro, not Core.
Hobby is free for personal repositories with limited AI reviews; the current pricing and billing pages do not publish a numeric free-review allowance. Starter is $20/seat/month billed annually with limited AI reviews; Team is $40/seat/month billed annually with unlimited AI reviews; Enterprise is custom. The Team-plan trial lasts 30 days or until upgrade, whichever comes first. Suggested fixes and CI summaries are listed for Team/Enterprise, not every paid plan.
Bundled with Copilot plans that include code review (Pro lists access to cloud agent and code review, with $15 monthly credits on Pro). Licensed-user review draws from the Copilot allowance. Orgs can enable review on PRs from people without a Copilot seat; that usage bills as GitHub AI Credits. From 2026-06-01, code-review workflows also consume GitHub Actions minutes.
Usage-based since the May 2026 change (legacy $40/seat plans renew onto usage billing after 2026-06-08). Individuals consume included usage then on-demand; Teams bill from on-demand spend. Cursor's May 2026 blog gives a $1.00–$1.50 average run cost depending on PR size; this is a vendor average, not a fixed list price. Cursor's current pricing page lists Pro at $20/month and Teams at $40/user/month, with Bugbot on usage-based billing. Confirm current run rates at cursor.com/pricing#bugbot. 14-day free trial on the product page.
Research preview on Claude Team and Enterprise plans. Billed separately through usage credits by tokens — it does not count against the plan's included usage. Anthropic's stated average is $15–25 per review; admins can set monthly spend caps. Not available with zero data retention.
Requires eligible cloud GitHub-review access. Codex Cloud is available to eligible Plus, all Pro tiers, Business, Enterprise, Healthcare, and Education accounts, subject to rollout and workspace settings; it is not included with Free or Go. Review usage draws on the account's Codex allowance, workspace credits or applicable Enterprise token-based USD agreement. An API-key sign-in does not unlock cloud GitHub review.
Enterprise reviews draw ACUs from the shared enterprise pool; Individual/Teams automatic-review caps are measured in on-demand dollars. The XS (≤2.25 ACUs) to XL (>18 ACUs) indicator describes total usage across all review jobs on a PR, not a fixed price for one review. Public PRs can be viewed without an account, but unconnected public repos cannot use auto-review. No per-ACU dollar price is published in the review docs.
Head to head
CodeRabbit, Qodo, Greptile, and Gitar sit in the same matrix as Graphite, GitHub Copilot code review, and Cursor Bugbot. Rankings are not bought; unverified prices stay labelled.
CodeRabbit vs Qodo
GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps / GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps · Gerrit (on-premises)
CodeRabbit vs Greptile
GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps / GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket (confirm deployment scope) · Cursor Origin (vendor-listed; integration scope not specified) · GitHub Enterprise Server (Enterprise) · GitLab Self-Managed (Enterprise) · Bitbucket Data Center (Enterprise) · Gitea (Enterprise) · Perforce P4 (Enterprise)
CodeRabbit vs Gitar
GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps / GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps
CodeRabbit vs Graphite
GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps / GitHub
Gitar vs Graphite
GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps / GitHub
Cursor Bugbot vs Graphite
GitHub (including GHES) · GitLab (including self-hosted) · Bitbucket (including Data Center) · Azure DevOps Services (public beta) · Cursor Origin (documented autofix modes) / GitHub
CodeRabbit vs GitHub Copilot code review
GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps / GitHub · Azure DevOps (public preview)
CodeRabbit vs Cursor Bugbot
GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps / GitHub (including GHES) · GitLab (including self-hosted) · Bitbucket (including Data Center) · Azure DevOps Services (public beta) · Cursor Origin (documented autofix modes)
Gitar vs Greptile
GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps / GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket (confirm deployment scope) · Cursor Origin (vendor-listed; integration scope not specified) · GitHub Enterprise Server (Enterprise) · GitLab Self-Managed (Enterprise) · Bitbucket Data Center (Enterprise) · Gitea (Enterprise) · Perforce P4 (Enterprise)
Gitar vs Qodo
GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps / GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps · Gerrit (on-premises)
Greptile vs Qodo
GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket (confirm deployment scope) · Cursor Origin (vendor-listed; integration scope not specified) · GitHub Enterprise Server (Enterprise) · GitLab Self-Managed (Enterprise) · Bitbucket Data Center (Enterprise) · Gitea (Enterprise) · Perforce P4 (Enterprise) / GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps · Gerrit (on-premises)
Cursor Bugbot vs Gitar
GitHub (including GHES) · GitLab (including self-hosted) · Bitbucket (including Data Center) · Azure DevOps Services (public beta) · Cursor Origin (documented autofix modes) / GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps
Cursor Bugbot vs Greptile
GitHub (including GHES) · GitLab (including self-hosted) · Bitbucket (including Data Center) · Azure DevOps Services (public beta) · Cursor Origin (documented autofix modes) / GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket (confirm deployment scope) · Cursor Origin (vendor-listed; integration scope not specified) · GitHub Enterprise Server (Enterprise) · GitLab Self-Managed (Enterprise) · Bitbucket Data Center (Enterprise) · Gitea (Enterprise) · Perforce P4 (Enterprise)
Cursor Bugbot vs GitHub Copilot code review
GitHub (including GHES) · GitLab (including self-hosted) · Bitbucket (including Data Center) · Azure DevOps Services (public beta) · Cursor Origin (documented autofix modes) / GitHub · Azure DevOps (public preview)
GitHub Copilot code review vs Qodo
GitHub · Azure DevOps (public preview) / GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps · Gerrit (on-premises)
Claude Code Review vs CodeRabbit
GitHub · GitHub Enterprise Server (self-hosted) / GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps
Claude Code Review vs GitHub Copilot code review
GitHub · GitHub Enterprise Server (self-hosted) / GitHub · Azure DevOps (public preview)
CodeRabbit vs OpenAI Codex code review
GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps / GitHub
GitHub Copilot code review vs OpenAI Codex code review
GitHub · Azure DevOps (public preview) / GitHub
CodeRabbit vs Devin Review
GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure DevOps / GitHub (incl. Enterprise Server and Enterprise Cloud) · GitLab (incl. Self-Managed) · Azure DevOps Services / Server 2020–2022 (connected)
CodeRabbit
A dedicated reviewer for GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps, plus CLI and IDE loops around the PR comment.
Checked
Qodo
A governance-heavy reviewer: rules, cross-repo context, and analytics aimed at teams drowning in AI-generated PRs — not only a comment bot.
Checked
Greptile
A repository-context reviewer: the vendor describes a graph index and parallel review agents; credits are charged for completed reviews, not for keeping the graph.
Checked
Gitar
A reviewer that treats a red build as the job: comments, then fixes, then re-runs CI. Distinct from comment-only bots.
Checked
Graphite
Consider Graphite for stacked PRs, with limited AI reviews on Hobby/Starter and review customization plus a merge queue on Team/Enterprise.
Checked
The default if the team already pays for Copilot: no second GitHub App, no second vendor review.
Checked
Cursor
Cursor’s production reviewer: bug-first, not style-first, and wired back into the Cursor editor the team already switched to.
Checked
Anthropic
Anthropic's PR reviewer for eligible Team/Enterprise organizations, with vendor-described multi-agent analysis and separate token billing.
Checked
OpenAI
The default reviewer for teams already paying for ChatGPT with Codex: no second vendor, and usage comes out of the existing Codex allowance.
Checked
Cognition
Cognition's reviewer for teams already paying for Devin, with host-specific support for GitHub, GitLab and Azure DevOps.
Checked
Review bots do not replace Cursor, Claude Code, or Copilot in the editor.
Common questions
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.