CodeRabbit (PR reviews, CLI, and IDE) against Qodo (PR review, IDE, and agent skills). Billing, hourly throughput, hosts, autofix, and merge-gate claims retain the source date for each product: CodeRabbit October 1, 2026; Qodo October 1, 2026.
The current pricing page advertises a 14-day free trial with no credit card. The plan docs still describe a default Pro+ trial with 10 PR reviews per developer per hour and 150 files per PR. The selected trial tier and its exact current limits are not reconciled with the renamed pricing plans; confirm them in the account before relying on a quota.
14-day trial with unlimited credits, no card. Trial is the initial state of every workspace, not a separate plan.
Config / rules
Config / rules
.coderabbit.yaml at repo root, plus CodeRabbit dashboard (reviews.auto_review and related)
CodeRabbit checked October 1, 2026; Qodo checked October 1, 2026. Dollar figures and merge-gate behaviour should be re-read on the vendor pricing page before a contract.
Per seatFree for qualifying OSS
CodeRabbit
A dedicated reviewer for GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps, plus CLI and IDE loops around the PR comment.
Best for
Teams on mixed git hosts
Orgs that want a dedicated reviewer with linters and issue trackers attached
Open-source maintainers who want free public-repo reviews
Watch out
Per-seat pricing scales with PR authors, not with workspace. The pricing table lists no custom checks for Essentials, 10 for Team, and 20 for Advanced/Enterprise; older docs still describe Pro+ with 20, so confirm the selected subscription. Built-in checks are included in paid plans. Checks default to warning; merge blocking requires error mode plus Request Changes Workflow. Self-hosting is an Enterprise option. Autofix requires Essentials or higher and an enabled setting; current docs cover GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket Cloud, without establishing Bitbucket Data Center parity. Generated fixes can be delivered even when their build verification fails. Security Scan and Agent usage are billed separately. Confirm current prices, trial tier and file/IDE/CLI limits in the selected account where public pages disagree.
Hybrid
Qodo
A governance-heavy reviewer: rules, cross-repo context, and analytics aimed at teams drowning in AI-generated PRs — not only a comment bot.
Best for
Orgs applying shared review standards across many repos
Teams mixing IDE review with PR review
Enterprises that want BYOK or on-prem options
Watch out
Credit packs and the workspace spending cap determine paid usage; “No rate limits” does not mean unlimited included reviews. Credits expire monthly and overage uses the base credit rate. Pricing and billing docs disagree on the Pro Team user ceiling, so confirm the selected entitlement. Single-tenant and on-premises deployment are Enterprise-only; the installation matrix lists Gerrit and Bitbucket Data Center for on-premises. Git-provider features differ: PR-history indexing is beta on GitHub/GitLab, and Bitbucket/Gerrit do not support collapsible finding sections. No provider-wide autofix or merge-enforcement capability is inferred from agent skills or configuration options.
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Where do CodeRabbit and Qodo run?
CodeRabbit runs as pr reviews, cli, and ide on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps. Qodo runs as pr review, ide, and agent skills on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Gerrit (on-premises).
How do CodeRabbit and Qodo bill?
CodeRabbit: Essentials (formerly Pro) $24/user/month billed annually ($30 month-to-month); Team (formerly Pro Plus) $48/user/month billed annually ($60 month-to-month). Advanced adds blast-radius and architectural-impact analysis, security review on every PR, and continuous security monitoring; its current price was not visible in the public source capture. Enterprise is custom. All plans advertise a 14-day free trial with no card. Seats are billed for developers who create PRs, or assigned manually. Public repositories have free reviews with separate eligibility and usage limits. CodeRabbit Security Scan is usage-based; CodeRabbit Agent is $0.40 per agent minute; eligible over-limit reviews can continue at $0.25 per reviewed file. Qodo: Pro Team uses pooled workspace credits, not per-seat billing: $0.012/credit, with a $30 2,500-credit pack (~18 reviews/month by Qodo's estimate); 5,000 and 20,000 credits are estimated at ~36/~144 reviews. The pricing page markets Pro Team for up to 30 users and Enterprise for 30+, while the billing docs describe unlimited Pro Teams users; confirm the selected workspace's entitlement. Monthly billing, no annual self-serve commitment. Credits expire monthly without rollover; overage uses the same credit rate up to a customer-set cap. The 14-day trial has unlimited credits and no card. Enterprise adds SSO, BYOK, single-tenant or on-premises deployment. No permanent free tier; qualified OSS projects can apply for free access.
What is the hourly or throughput limit for CodeRabbit vs Qodo?
CodeRabbit: The current pricing table lists PR review allowances per developer per hour: Essentials 5, Team 8, Advanced 10, Enterprise 12, subject to Fair Usage Policy. The plan docs still use legacy Pro/Pro+ names and list different file/trial limits; exact current file caps, IDE/CLI allowances and default trial-tier limits are not reconciled. Those legacy tables must not be treated as a uniform entitlement for the renamed plans. Free provides PR summaries and separate IDE/CLI review allowances; OSS review availability varies with project community/popularity, with no numeric OSS PR allowance confirmed. Eligible over-limit reviews can use optional $0.25/file billing with a configurable monthly spending cap; Enterprise arrangements are negotiated. Qodo: No published per-developer hourly PR cap. The Pro Team pricing page states “No rate limits”; usage is pooled workspace credits with overage up to a configurable monthly spending cap. Docs also say reviews can skip until the next billing cycle if a monthly review limit is hit, and GitHub’s own hourly API rate limit can delay processing. After the trial, usage stops unless paid billing is active.
Can CodeRabbit or Qodo apply fixes?
CodeRabbit: Yes. Qodo: Not verified. Autofix is still a suggestion until your CI and humans accept it.
Can CodeRabbit or Qodo block a merge?
CodeRabbit: Yes. Qodo: Not verified. A missing verification means we did not treat marketing copy as a merge-gate claim.
Should I choose CodeRabbit or Qodo?
Choose CodeRabbit if this matches: Teams on mixed git hosts. Orgs that want a dedicated reviewer with linters and issue trackers attached. Open-source maintainers who want free public-repo reviews. Choose Qodo if this matches: Orgs applying shared review standards across many repos. Teams mixing IDE review with PR review. Enterprises that want BYOK or on-prem options. CodeRabbit watch-out: Per-seat pricing scales with PR authors, not with workspace. The pricing table lists no custom checks for Essentials, 10 for Team, and 20 for Advanced/Enterprise; older docs still describe Pro+ with 20, so confirm the selected subscription. Built-in checks are included in paid plans. Checks default to warning; merge blocking requires error mode plus Request Changes Workflow. Self-hosting is an Enterprise option. Autofix requires Essentials or higher and an enabled setting; current docs cover GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket Cloud, without establishing Bitbucket Data Center parity. Generated fixes can be delivered even when their build verification fails. Security Scan and Agent usage are billed separately. Confirm current prices, trial tier and file/IDE/CLI limits in the selected account where public pages disagree. Qodo watch-out: Credit packs and the workspace spending cap determine paid usage; “No rate limits” does not mean unlimited included reviews. Credits expire monthly and overage uses the base credit rate. Pricing and billing docs disagree on the Pro Team user ceiling, so confirm the selected entitlement. Single-tenant and on-premises deployment are Enterprise-only; the installation matrix lists Gerrit and Bitbucket Data Center for on-premises. Git-provider features differ: PR-history indexing is beta on GitHub/GitLab, and Bitbucket/Gerrit do not support collapsible finding sections. No provider-wide autofix or merge-enforcement capability is inferred from agent skills or configuration options.