Gitar vs Qodo

Gitar runs as pr review plus ci fix loop on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps. Qodo runs as pr review, ide, and agent skills on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Gerrit (on-premises).

Gitar: Core $20/user/month billed annually ($25 monthly); Pro $40/user/month billed annually ($50 monthly); both capped at 50 users. Enterprise is custom and outcome-based per PR, with unlimited users, custom agreements, bring-your-own Anthropic key, and support for self-hosted code-hosting systems. Pricing now lives on sonarsource.com. 14-day Pro trial, no card. Public GitHub/GitLab repos with an OSI-approved licence can apply for free Pro features. PR summaries are included in Core and higher plans. Merge blocking is Pro, not Core. Qodo: Pro Team uses pooled workspace credits, not per-seat billing: $0.012/credit, with a $30 2,500-credit pack (~18 reviews/month by Qodo's estimate); 5,000 and 20,000 credits are estimated at ~36/~144 reviews. The pricing page markets Pro Team for up to 30 users and Enterprise for 30+, while the billing docs describe unlimited Pro Teams users; confirm the selected workspace's entitlement. Monthly billing, no annual self-serve commitment. Credits expire monthly without rollover; overage uses the same credit rate up to a customer-set cap. The 14-day trial has unlimited credits and no card. Enterprise adds SSO, BYOK, single-tenant or on-premises deployment. No permanent free tier; qualified OSS projects can apply for free access.

Gitar: The current vendor page says Enterprise has no rate limits and charges by PR outcome, with unlimited iterations per PR. Core and Pro have published per-user prices and 50-user ceilings, but the current pricing/docs pages reviewed do not state their automatic-review or CI-fix allowance. No separate manual-review or REST API request quota was found in those sources. Qodo: No published per-developer hourly PR cap. The Pro Team pricing page states “No rate limits”; usage is pooled workspace credits with overage up to a configurable monthly spending cap. Docs also say reviews can skip until the next billing cycle if a monthly review limit is hit, and GitHub’s own hourly API rate limit can delay processing. After the trial, usage stops unless paid billing is active.

Gitar: Yes. Qodo: Not verified. Autofix is still a suggestion until your CI and humans accept it.

Gitar: Yes. Qodo: Not verified. A missing verification means we did not treat marketing copy as a merge-gate claim.

Choose Gitar if this matches: Teams that want CI failure analysis next to the review. Orgs evaluating supervised bot fixes and CI verification. GitHub or GitLab shops evaluating a Sonar-owned reviewer. Choose Qodo if this matches: Orgs applying shared review standards across many repos. Teams mixing IDE review with PR review. Enterprises that want BYOK or on-prem options. Gitar watch-out: Core/Pro are capped at 50 users; Enterprise allows unlimited users and is priced by PR outcome, with unlimited iterations per PR. The vendor says Enterprise has no rate limits; it does not publish a Core/Pro automatic-review allowance on the sources checked. Merge blocking is Pro, not Core. Gitar supports GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps, including self-hosted code-hosting instances; this does not establish that the Gitar service itself runs on-premises. Qodo watch-out: Credit packs and the workspace spending cap determine paid usage; “No rate limits” does not mean unlimited included reviews. Credits expire monthly and overage uses the base credit rate. Pricing and billing docs disagree on the Pro Team user ceiling, so confirm the selected entitlement. Single-tenant and on-premises deployment are Enterprise-only; the installation matrix lists Gerrit and Bitbucket Data Center for on-premises. Git-provider features differ: PR-history indexing is beta on GitHub/GitLab, and Bitbucket/Gerrit do not support collapsible finding sections. No provider-wide autofix or merge-enforcement capability is inferred from agent skills or configuration options.