AI code review comparison
Greptile vs Qodo
Greptile (Full-repo context PR review) against Qodo (PR review, IDE, and agent skills). Billing, hourly throughput, hosts, autofix, and merge-gate claims retain the source date for each product: Greptile October 1, 2026; Qodo October 1, 2026.
Greptile
Greptile
Full-repo context PR review
Qodo
Qodo
PR review, IDE, and agent skills
| Specification | Greptile | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ||
| Vendor | Greptile | Qodo |
| Git hosts | ||
| Git hosts | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket (confirm deployment scope), Cursor Origin (vendor-listed; integration scope not specified), GitHub Enterprise Server (Enterprise), GitLab Self-Managed (Enterprise), Bitbucket Data Center (Enterprise), Gitea (Enterprise), Perforce P4 (Enterprise) | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Gerrit (on-premises) |
| Surface | ||
| Surface | Full-repo context PR review | PR review, IDE, and agent skills |
| Billing model | ||
| Billing model | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Hourly / throughput | ||
| Hourly / throughput | Credits, not hourly | Credits + spending cap (no hourly PR meter) |
| Trial | ||
| Trial | 14-day Pro trial. | 14-day trial with unlimited credits, no card. Trial is the initial state of every workspace, not a separate plan. |
| Config / rules | ||
| Config / rules | Custom rules (Pro) | Qodo portal; repository wiki/root `.pr_agent.toml`; organization/project `pr-agent-settings` repositories |
| Inline comment cap | ||
| Inline comment cap | Not verifiedUnverified | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Self-hosted option | ||
| Self-hosted option | Yes | Yes |
| CI hosts | ||
| CI hosts | Not a separate CI product | Not a separate CI product |
| Autofix | ||
| Autofix | Not verifiedUnverified | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Merge gate | ||
| Merge gate | Not verifiedUnverified | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Free for qualifying OSS | ||
| Free for qualifying OSS | Yes | Not verifiedUnverified |
Greptile checked October 1, 2026; Qodo checked October 1, 2026. Dollar figures and merge-gate behaviour should be re-read on the vendor pricing page before a contract.
Greptile
A repository-context reviewer: the vendor describes a graph index and parallel review agents; credits are charged for completed reviews, not for keeping the graph.
Best for
- Teams whose defects are cross-file, not line-local
- Enterprises on Bitbucket Data Center, Gitea or Perforce
- Solo developers who can live on the free 50-credit Starter cap
- Early-stage startups that qualify for the 50% discount
Watch out
Each author has 50 included credits; balances are not pooled. Billing counts completed reviews, not PRs, and attributed CLI reviews share the user's seat/credits; unattributed API/CLI reviews bill as flex without creating an active-developer seat. Base/Plus/Apex use 1/3/10 credits, with $1 per additional credit. A flex-spend cap pauses overage reviews while authors with included credits can continue. Legacy T-Rex is also listed at 3 credits; do not mix its results with other tiers. The homepage lists GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Cursor Origin; confirm the selected integration/deployment scope. Enterprise lists GHES, residency-enabled GitHub Enterprise Cloud, self-managed GitLab, Bitbucket Data Center, Gitea and on-premises Perforce P4.
Qodo
A governance-heavy reviewer: rules, cross-repo context, and analytics aimed at teams drowning in AI-generated PRs — not only a comment bot.
Best for
- Orgs applying shared review standards across many repos
- Teams mixing IDE review with PR review
- Enterprises that want BYOK or on-prem options
Watch out
Credit packs and the workspace spending cap determine paid usage; “No rate limits” does not mean unlimited included reviews. Credits expire monthly and overage uses the base credit rate. Pricing and billing docs disagree on the Pro Team user ceiling, so confirm the selected entitlement. Single-tenant and on-premises deployment are Enterprise-only; the installation matrix lists Gerrit and Bitbucket Data Center for on-premises. Git-provider features differ: PR-history indexing is beta on GitHub/GitLab, and Bitbucket/Gerrit do not support collapsible finding sections. No provider-wide autofix or merge-enforcement capability is inferred from agent skills or configuration options.
Common questions
Greptile vs Qodo questions
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.