AI code review comparison
Greptile vs Qodo
Greptile (Full-repo context PR review) against Qodo (PR review, IDE, and agent skills). Billing, hourly throughput, hosts, autofix, and merge-gate claims are dated August 16, 2026.
Greptile
Greptile
Full-repo context PR review
Qodo
Qodo
PR review, IDE, and agent skills
| Specification | Greptile | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Greptile | Qodo |
| Git hosts | GitHub, GitLab | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps |
| Surface | Full-repo context PR review | PR review, IDE, and agent skills |
| Billing model | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Hourly / throughput | Credits, not hourly | Credits + spending cap (no hourly PR meter) |
| Trial | 14-day Pro trial. | 14-day trial with unlimited credits, no card. Trial is the initial state of every workspace, not a separate plan. |
| Config / rules | Custom rules (Pro) | .pr_agent.toml, REVIEW.md, Qodo portal (finding_overflow_count default 3) |
| Inline comment cap | Not verified | Not verified |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | Yes |
| CI hosts | Not a separate CI product | Not a separate CI product |
| Autofix | Not verified | Not verified |
| Merge gate | Not verified | Not verified |
| Free for qualifying OSS | Yes | Not verified |
Catalog checked August 16, 2026. Dollar figures and merge-gate behaviour should be re-read on the vendor pricing page before a contract.
Greptile
The full-codebase reviewer: it spends credits to keep a graph of the repo, which is the point when bugs live in call sites the diff does not show.
Best for
- Teams whose defects are cross-file, not line-local
- Solo developers who can live on the free 50-credit Starter cap
- Early-stage startups that qualify for the 50% discount
Watch out
Credits run out: 50 standard reviews per seat, then $1 each, and TREX burns three credits. GitHub and GitLab only on the public pricing page. Confirm TREX vs standard before comparing catch-rate anecdotes from third-party blogs.
Qodo
A governance-heavy reviewer: rules, cross-repo context, and analytics aimed at teams drowning in AI-generated PRs — not only a comment bot.
Best for
- Orgs that need enforceable coding standards across many repos
- Teams mixing IDE review with PR review
- Enterprises that want BYOK or on-prem options
Watch out
Credit packs and the monthly spending cap drive the bill after the trial — the pricing-page “No rate limits” line is not the same as unlimited included reviews. Unused-credit rollover should be confirmed on the vendor FAQ. Do not confuse Qodo (qodo.ai, formerly CodiumAI) with Qodex (qodex.ai), which is an agentic QA platform.
Common questions
Greptile vs Qodo questions
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Where do Greptile and Qodo run?
Greptile runs as full-repo context pr review on GitHub, GitLab. Qodo runs as pr review, ide, and agent skills on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps.
How do Greptile and Qodo bill?
Greptile: Starter: free, 1 active developer, 50 credits/month. Pro: $30/seat/month, 50 credits included per seat, then $1 per extra credit. 1 credit = 1 standard review; 3 credits = 1 TREX review. A seat is any developer who received a Greptile review in that billing period. 14-day Pro trial. Free for qualified MIT/Apache non-commercial OSS. 50% off for pre-Series A startups under $2M trailing-12-month revenue. Qodo: Pro Team uses pooled credits at $0.012/credit. Packs: 2,500 / 5,000 / 20,000 credits (~18 / ~36 / ~144 reviews per month on Qodo’s own conversion). 14-day trial with unlimited credits, no card, no annual commitment on Pro Team. Enterprise is custom (SSO, BYOK, single-tenant or on-prem). Confirm current packaging on qodo.ai/pricing — seat vs credit mix can change.
What is the hourly or throughput limit for Greptile vs Qodo?
Greptile: No published hourly cap. Starter: 50 credits/month for one active developer. Pro: 50 credits included per seat/month, then $1 per extra credit. One standard review uses 1 credit; one TREX review uses 3. Qodo: No published per-developer hourly PR cap. The Pro Team pricing page states “No rate limits”; usage is pooled workspace credits with overage up to a configurable monthly spending cap. Docs also say reviews can skip until the next billing cycle if a monthly review limit is hit, and GitHub’s own hourly API rate limit can delay processing. After the trial, usage stops unless paid billing is active.
Should I choose Greptile or Qodo?
Choose Greptile if this matches: Teams whose defects are cross-file, not line-local. Solo developers who can live on the free 50-credit Starter cap. Early-stage startups that qualify for the 50% discount. Choose Qodo if this matches: Orgs that need enforceable coding standards across many repos. Teams mixing IDE review with PR review. Enterprises that want BYOK or on-prem options. Greptile watch-out: Credits run out: 50 standard reviews per seat, then $1 each, and TREX burns three credits. GitHub and GitLab only on the public pricing page. Confirm TREX vs standard before comparing catch-rate anecdotes from third-party blogs. Qodo watch-out: Credit packs and the monthly spending cap drive the bill after the trial — the pricing-page “No rate limits” line is not the same as unlimited included reviews. Unused-credit rollover should be confirmed on the vendor FAQ. Do not confuse Qodo (qodo.ai, formerly CodiumAI) with Qodex (qodex.ai), which is an agentic QA platform.