Skip to main content
AI Choice Engine
← All AI code review tools

AI code review comparison

Greptile vs Qodo

Greptile (Full-repo context PR review) against Qodo (PR review, IDE, and agent skills). Billing, hourly throughput, hosts, autofix, and merge-gate claims retain the source date for each product: Greptile October 1, 2026; Qodo October 1, 2026.

Greptile

Greptile

Full-repo context PR review

vs

Qodo

Qodo

PR review, IDE, and agent skills

Greptile versus Qodo specification comparison
SpecificationGreptileQodo
VendorGreptileQodo
Git hostsGitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket (confirm deployment scope), Cursor Origin (vendor-listed; integration scope not specified), GitHub Enterprise Server (Enterprise), GitLab Self-Managed (Enterprise), Bitbucket Data Center (Enterprise), Gitea (Enterprise), Perforce P4 (Enterprise)GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Gerrit (on-premises)
SurfaceFull-repo context PR reviewPR review, IDE, and agent skills
Billing modelHybridHybrid
Hourly / throughputCredits, not hourlyCredits + spending cap (no hourly PR meter)
Trial14-day Pro trial.14-day trial with unlimited credits, no card. Trial is the initial state of every workspace, not a separate plan.
Config / rulesCustom rules (Pro)Qodo portal; repository wiki/root `.pr_agent.toml`; organization/project `pr-agent-settings` repositories
Inline comment capNot verifiedUnverifiedNot verifiedUnverified
Self-hosted optionYesYes
CI hostsNot a separate CI productNot a separate CI product
AutofixNot verifiedUnverifiedNot verifiedUnverified
Merge gateNot verifiedUnverifiedNot verifiedUnverified
Free for qualifying OSSYesNot verifiedUnverified

Greptile checked October 1, 2026; Qodo checked October 1, 2026. Dollar figures and merge-gate behaviour should be re-read on the vendor pricing page before a contract.

HybridFree for qualifying OSS

Greptile

A repository-context reviewer: the vendor describes a graph index and parallel review agents; credits are charged for completed reviews, not for keeping the graph.

Best for

  • Teams whose defects are cross-file, not line-local
  • Enterprises on Bitbucket Data Center, Gitea or Perforce
  • Solo developers who can live on the free 50-credit Starter cap
  • Early-stage startups that qualify for the 50% discount

Watch out

Each author has 50 included credits; balances are not pooled. Billing counts completed reviews, not PRs, and attributed CLI reviews share the user's seat/credits; unattributed API/CLI reviews bill as flex without creating an active-developer seat. Base/Plus/Apex use 1/3/10 credits, with $1 per additional credit. A flex-spend cap pauses overage reviews while authors with included credits can continue. Legacy T-Rex is also listed at 3 credits; do not mix its results with other tiers. The homepage lists GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Cursor Origin; confirm the selected integration/deployment scope. Enterprise lists GHES, residency-enabled GitHub Enterprise Cloud, self-managed GitLab, Bitbucket Data Center, Gitea and on-premises Perforce P4.

Hybrid

Qodo

A governance-heavy reviewer: rules, cross-repo context, and analytics aimed at teams drowning in AI-generated PRs — not only a comment bot.

Best for

  • Orgs applying shared review standards across many repos
  • Teams mixing IDE review with PR review
  • Enterprises that want BYOK or on-prem options

Watch out

Credit packs and the workspace spending cap determine paid usage; “No rate limits” does not mean unlimited included reviews. Credits expire monthly and overage uses the base credit rate. Pricing and billing docs disagree on the Pro Team user ceiling, so confirm the selected entitlement. Single-tenant and on-premises deployment are Enterprise-only; the installation matrix lists Gerrit and Bitbucket Data Center for on-premises. Git-provider features differ: PR-history indexing is beta on GitHub/GitLab, and Bitbucket/Gerrit do not support collapsible finding sections. No provider-wide autofix or merge-enforcement capability is inferred from agent skills or configuration options.

Common questions

Greptile vs Qodo questions

Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.

Where do Greptile and Qodo run?
Greptile runs as full-repo context pr review on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket (confirm deployment scope), Cursor Origin (vendor-listed; integration scope not specified), GitHub Enterprise Server (Enterprise), GitLab Self-Managed (Enterprise), Bitbucket Data Center (Enterprise), Gitea (Enterprise), Perforce P4 (Enterprise). Qodo runs as pr review, ide, and agent skills on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Gerrit (on-premises).
How do Greptile and Qodo bill?
Greptile: Starter: free, 1 active developer, 50 credits/month. Pro: $30/seat/month, 50 credits included per seat, then $1 per extra credit. Review tiers: Base (1 credit), Plus (3 credits), Apex (10 credits). A seat is any developer who received a Greptile review in that billing period. 14-day Pro trial. Free for qualified MIT/Apache non-commercial OSS. 50% off for pre-Series A startups under $2M trailing-12-month revenue. Qodo: Pro Team uses pooled workspace credits, not per-seat billing: $0.012/credit, with a $30 2,500-credit pack (~18 reviews/month by Qodo's estimate); 5,000 and 20,000 credits are estimated at ~36/~144 reviews. The pricing page markets Pro Team for up to 30 users and Enterprise for 30+, while the billing docs describe unlimited Pro Teams users; confirm the selected workspace's entitlement. Monthly billing, no annual self-serve commitment. Credits expire monthly without rollover; overage uses the same credit rate up to a customer-set cap. The 14-day trial has unlimited credits and no card. Enterprise adds SSO, BYOK, single-tenant or on-premises deployment. No permanent free tier; qualified OSS projects can apply for free access.
What is the hourly or throughput limit for Greptile vs Qodo?
Greptile: No published hourly cap. Starter: 50 credits/month for one active developer. Pro: 50 credits included per seat/month, then $1 per extra credit. A Base review uses 1 credit, Plus 3, and Apex 10. Qodo: No published per-developer hourly PR cap. The Pro Team pricing page states “No rate limits”; usage is pooled workspace credits with overage up to a configurable monthly spending cap. Docs also say reviews can skip until the next billing cycle if a monthly review limit is hit, and GitHub’s own hourly API rate limit can delay processing. After the trial, usage stops unless paid billing is active.
Should I choose Greptile or Qodo?
Choose Greptile if this matches: Teams whose defects are cross-file, not line-local. Enterprises on Bitbucket Data Center, Gitea or Perforce. Solo developers who can live on the free 50-credit Starter cap. Early-stage startups that qualify for the 50% discount. Choose Qodo if this matches: Orgs applying shared review standards across many repos. Teams mixing IDE review with PR review. Enterprises that want BYOK or on-prem options. Greptile watch-out: Each author has 50 included credits; balances are not pooled. Billing counts completed reviews, not PRs, and attributed CLI reviews share the user's seat/credits; unattributed API/CLI reviews bill as flex without creating an active-developer seat. Base/Plus/Apex use 1/3/10 credits, with $1 per additional credit. A flex-spend cap pauses overage reviews while authors with included credits can continue. Legacy T-Rex is also listed at 3 credits; do not mix its results with other tiers. The homepage lists GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Cursor Origin; confirm the selected integration/deployment scope. Enterprise lists GHES, residency-enabled GitHub Enterprise Cloud, self-managed GitLab, Bitbucket Data Center, Gitea and on-premises Perforce P4. Qodo watch-out: Credit packs and the workspace spending cap determine paid usage; “No rate limits” does not mean unlimited included reviews. Credits expire monthly and overage uses the base credit rate. Pricing and billing docs disagree on the Pro Team user ceiling, so confirm the selected entitlement. Single-tenant and on-premises deployment are Enterprise-only; the installation matrix lists Gerrit and Bitbucket Data Center for on-premises. Git-provider features differ: PR-history indexing is beta on GitHub/GitLab, and Bitbucket/Gerrit do not support collapsible finding sections. No provider-wide autofix or merge-enforcement capability is inferred from agent skills or configuration options.