SpaceXAI
Grok 4.6
SpaceXAI's current code and chat default — same $2/$6 list as Grok 4.5, with a 500K context window and image input.
Catalog record checked August 12, 2026; individual provider fields may change.
| Specification | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|
| Provider | SpaceXAI |
| Tier | Frontier |
| Context window | 500K |
| Max output | Not verified |
| Input / 1M tokens | $2 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $6 |
| Weights | Closed |
| Parameters | Not disclosed |
| Modalities | text, image |
| Released | August 12, 2026 |
Pricing tiers: Base tier is $2/$6 per million tokens; prompts at or above 200K tokens are priced at $4/$12. Cached input is $0.50 / $1.00. Web/X search tool calls bill separately.
Verified evidence
Published benchmark results
Each result keeps its source and measurement date visible. A missing benchmark is not treated as a zero.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [high]
2026-08-12 · Artificial Analysis
Benchmark
DeepSWE 1.1 in context
The full local snapshot puts this model beside the wider field, including cost per completed task.
Local leader
Claude Opus 5 [max]
74%
Rows shown
24
Highest published reasoning effort per model (not best Pass@1)
Snapshot date
2026-08-13
Mirrored from deepswe.datacurve.ai
Better is toward the top-right (higher pass rate, lower cost). X-axis is reversed to match DeepSWE’s public chart. v1.1 uses average cost / tokens / steps; v1 uses published medians.
| # | Model | Pass@1 | Cost / task | Tokens / task | Steps / task |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5 [max] | 74% | $11.84 | 118k | 99 |
| 2 | GPT-5.6 Sol [max] | 73% | $8.39 | 60k | 61 |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5 [max] | 70% | $21.63 | 119k | 88 |
| 4 | GPT-5.6 Terra [max] | 70% | $4.95 | 72k | 76 |
| 5 | Kimi K3 [max] | 69% | $4.65 | 82k | 98 |
| 6 | GPT-5.6 Luna [max] | 67% | $3.03 | 73k | 102 |
| 7 | GPT-5.5 [xhigh] | 67% | $7.23 | 46k | 82 |
| 8 | Grok 4.6 [xhigh] | 67% | $5.50 | 71k | 87 |
| 9 | Gemini 3.7 Flash [high] | 65% | $2.18 | 107k | 125 |
| 10 | DeepSeek V4-Pro [max] | 63% | $0.24 | 106k | 155 |
| 11 | Claude Opus 4.8 [max] | 59% | $13.22 | 135k | 120 |
| 12 | Qwen3.8-Max [xhigh] | 58% | $3.73 | 95k | 111 |
| 13 | Muse Spark 1.2 [xhigh] | 55% | $3.70 | 99k | 101 |
| 14 | Claude Sonnet 5 [max] | 54% | $26.40 | 214k | 268 |
| 15 | Grok 4.5 [high] | 54% | $2.42 | 36k | 61 |
| 16 | DeepSeek V4-Flash [max] | 53% | $0.10 | 108k | 153 |
| 17 | Muse Spark 1.1 [xhigh] | 53% | $2.36 | 74k | 96 |
| 18 | GPT-5.4 [xhigh] | 52% | $5.65 | 71k | 70 |
| 19 | Gemini 3.6 Flash [high] | 47% | $4.42 | 96k | 117 |
| 20 | GLM 5.2 [max] | 44% | $3.92 | 78k | 129 |
| 21 | Gemini 3.5 Flash [high] | 36% | $3.45 | 76k | 105 |
| 22 | Kimi K2.7 Code | 31% | $2.82 | 59k | 149 |
| 23 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 [high] | 30% | $5.52 | 76k | 134 |
| 24 | Gemini 3.1 Pro [high] | 12% | $2.14 | 28k | 76 |
DeepSWE “Best” picks the highest published reasoning effort per model (not the highest pass rate). Small gaps may not be statistically meaningful — confirm on deepswe.datacurve.ai.
Best for
- Coding agents
- Chat and knowledge work
- Cost-sensitive frontier work
Watch out
Common questions
Grok 4.6
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
How much does Grok 4.6 cost per million tokens?
Grok 4.6 is listed at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens at standard rates. Output tokens usually dominate real bills, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. Base tier is $2/$6 per million tokens; prompts at or above 200K tokens are priced at $4/$12. Cached input is $0.50 / $1.00. Web/X search tool calls bill separately.
What is Grok 4.6's context window?
Grok 4.6 accepts about 500K tokens of context. That only matters if you routinely send very long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn histories that approach that limit.
What is Grok 4.6 best for?
Grok 4.6 is a frontier tier from SpaceXAI. It suits coding agents, chat and knowledge work, cost-sensitive frontier work. Token rates double above a 200K-token prompt. DeepSWE 1.1 best-effort for this family is the xhigh row at 66.7% (the catalog table rounds Pass@1 to 67%), not the higher-scoring medium config.
Compare it
Head-to-head model comparisons
These are the published pairings that put this model against a plausible alternative.