Skip to main content
AI Choice Engine

Local AI hardware

Best GPU for Local AI

Compare GPUs for local AI with a guided tool that starts from VRAM arithmetic — model size at Q4 — before raster charts or brand loyalty.

Published August 7, 20264 min readBy AI Choice Engine Editorial

Best starting point

GPU Finder

Built for builders running open models locally. Use this guide for context, then run the tool to turn those priorities into a clearer shortlist.

Explained methodology

Each tool and guide makes the decision criteria and fit logic visible.

Clear disclosure

Commercial relationships are disclosed so readers can judge with context.

Ongoing updates

Important guides and tools are reviewed as products and categories change.

Overview

The best GPU for local AI is usually the one with enough usable memory for the models you will actually run, not the card that wins a synthetic raster leaderboard. This guide separates capacity-first builds from gaming-first cards before you overspend.

Start with whether the model fits

Local inference fails as memory planning first. At Q4, a real Q4_K_M file costs about 0.6GB per billion parameters (roughly 4.85 bits per weight, not a flat 4), plus headroom for context and the OS. A 70B model is a ~42.5GB file and needs about 48GB with a modest context — which is why a 24GB card is a mid-size workhorse, not a 70B free pass.

Quantization and context length change the answer more than brand loyalty. A 7B–8B chat model at Q4 fits an 8GB card, and a 13B–14B model wants 12–16GB once a long prompt is loaded. A 32B–34B coding model wants 20GB+ before you start fighting swap. Multi-modal or long-context workloads eat VRAM that parameter-count tables never show. Write down the largest model you actually intend to keep resident, then size the card to that — not to a leaderboard you will never run.

Capacity tiers that match real workloads

Treat these as planning buckets, not product rankings:

  • 12–16GB — small and mid chat models, image tools that stay under the limit, light coding assistants. Fine for experimenting; painful if every useful model spills to CPU RAM.
  • 24GB — the practical sweet spot for many builders: mid-size open weights, batch jobs, and a second model occasionally in memory. Still the wrong expectation for comfortable single-GPU 70B.
  • 32GB — the RTX 5090 and the new 32GB prosumer cards (Intel Arc Pro B70, AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700): room for current 27B–32B models with long context, still not a 70B host.
  • 48GB+ discrete or 64GB+ unified memory — where 70B-class and long-context work stop being a science project. A 32GB card is short of the ~42.5GB Q4 weights alone; 48GB discrete or 64GB unified is a tight fit, and 72GB+ discrete or 96GB+ unified is comfortable. Apple Silicon or a Strix Halo / DGX Spark-class unified-memory box is often cheaper capacity than chasing multi-GPU desktops.

A 24GB or 32GB card can beat a faster 16GB gaming SKU for local AI specifically — but check used prices first: in September 2026 a used RTX 4090 ($2,499) cost more than the RTX 5090's $1,999 launch MSRP, and a used RTX 3090 ($1,000–1,350) about as much as a new 32GB Arc Pro B70 ($949). Do not buy a 16GB “faster” raster champion if your workload is “does the model fit.”

Then pick the ecosystem you can live with

CUDA remains the path most guides, Docker images, and tutorials assume. NVIDIA wins on “will this random repo run on day one,” which matters if you are not already fluent in ROCm debugging.

AMD and Intel often win on price per gigabyte — the 32GB Arc Pro B70 ($949) and Radeon AI PRO R9700 ($1,299 MSRP) undercut NVIDIA's 32GB card — with thinner day-one tooling. That trade is acceptable when you already know the stack you will run and have verified ROCm or Vulkan paths for it. It is a bad surprise when your first three GitHub READMEs only list CUDA.

Apple unified memory trades discrete gaming leadership for large-model capacity inside a Mac. Buy that path when the Mac form factor and memory size are the product; do not buy it as a substitute for a Windows gaming PC that also “does some AI.”

Power, case, and cooling are not footnotes

Local AI cards that sit at high utilization for hours stress the PSU and thermals harder than a gaming session that spikes and recovers. Check connector count, case clearance, and whether the card will throttle under sustained load in your chassis. A card that fits the VRAM math but browns out the power supply is not a bargain.

Laptop GPUs with the same marketing name usually have less usable memory bandwidth and worse sustained clocks than the desktop twin. If the machine must be portable, size for laptop reality — not desktop charts.

What to judge before spending

  • What is the largest model (parameters + quantization + context) you will keep loaded day to day?
  • Is day-one CUDA compatibility worth more than raw GB per pound?
  • Will this machine also game, or is it an inference box?
  • New vs used: is software support still active for the generation you are buying?
  • Desktop discrete, workstation, or Mac unified memory — which form factor you will actually keep on the desk?

Run the finder, then verify on the tables

Use the GPU finder for a shortlist keyed to your constraints, then confirm fit on the GPU memory tables and Mac capacity notes before you buy. Street prices move weekly; treat launch MSRP as an anchor only. If two cards both clear the VRAM bar, prefer the one whose software path you already use — capacity that sits idle behind broken drivers is still a failed purchase.

GPU Finder1 / 3

What is the main job for this GPU?

VRAM and software ecosystems diverge hard between games, creative apps, and local models. Pick the job that would make you regret the wrong card.

Restoring saved answers

Choose an option to continue

Frequently asked questions

How much VRAM do I need for a 70B model?
The Q4_K_M file alone is about 42.5GB, and you need roughly 48GB once a modest context is loaded. Single 24GB or 32GB cards are the wrong expectation for 70B; 48GB discrete or 64GB unified memory is tight, 72GB+ discrete or 96GB+ unified is comfortable.
Is the RTX 4090 still worth it for local AI?
Only at a genuinely fair used price. The RTX 4090 is discontinued, and in September 2026 used cards (~$2,499) cost more than the RTX 5090's $1,999 launch MSRP. 24GB still covers many mid-size workloads and Ada software support is mature, but it is not a substitute for 48GB+ discrete or 64GB+ unified memory when 70B is the real target.
Should I buy a Mac instead of a desktop GPU?
Buy a Mac when you want that form factor and enough unified memory for your models. Do not buy one as a Windows gaming substitute — check the Macs capacity table for usable-GB after OS headroom.

Suggested tools

Related guides

AI & tech clusters

Browse the category