Inference comparison
Groq vs Together AI
Managed inference API against managed inference api. Editorial fit scores help shortlist; live pricing stays on the provider sites.
Groq product facts checked October 2, 2026Groq editorial scores reviewed September 3, 2026Together AI product facts checked October 2, 2026Together AI editorial scores reviewed September 3, 2026
Managed inference API
Groq
GroqCloud model-specific token, audio-hour or character pricing; eligible asynchronous Batch requests receive a 50% discount. Dedicated platform terms differ.
Managed inference API
Together AI
Serverless per-token; dedicated inference per GPU-minute for ready replicas; GPU clusters and provisioned throughput have separate contracts.
Some outbound links use a first-party redirect hop for click counting. Commission is only claimed when a partner programme is active for that specific link — most vendor hops here are not paid placements. Affiliate disclosure.
| Dimension | Groq | Together AI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | ||
| Category | Managed inference API | Managed inference API |
| Billing | ||
| Billing | GroqCloud model-specific token, audio-hour or character pricing; eligible asynchronous Batch requests receive a 50% discount. Dedicated platform terms differ. | Serverless per-token; dedicated inference per GPU-minute for ready replicas; GPU clusters and provisioned throughput have separate contracts. |
| GPU choice | ||
| GPU choice | GroqMetal dedicated LPU infrastructure; GroqCore adds an inference stack and GroqAssured enterprise controls. These are separate from the shared GroqCloud API. | Managed serverless; dedicated deployment profiles with selected hardware; separate GPU clusters for infrastructure control. |
| Cold start | ||
| Cold start | GroqCloud is a shared API; no universal first-request latency is established by the captured documentation. Dedicated capacity has its own deployment terms. | Dedicated replicas need provisioning/model loading after restart or zero replicas; ready warm replicas continue billing while idle. No universal startup latency is established. |
| Model access | ||
| Model access | GroqCloud production and preview catalogs are separate. Current docs list GPT-OSS text and Whisper audio models; some Llama and MiniMax routes require Enterprise sales. Preview models are for evaluation and may be discontinued at short notice. | Serverless catalog plus supported dedicated models, fine-tunes and uploaded LoRA adapters. Custom deployment profiles must meet Together's supported-runtime requirements. |
| Best for | ||
| Best for | Latency-sensitive chat, agents, and batch inference on Groq’s supported model set | Serving open-weight models without operating your own GPU fleet |
| Watch out | ||
| Watch out | Confirm the exact served model, endpoint and current quota before committing architecture. Groq’s first-party announcement describes a non-exclusive NVIDIA technology licensing agreement. Its August 17, 2026 release confirms a $350M Series A; neither announcement establishes a fixed throughput or capacity guarantee for your workload. | Serverless token APIs, dedicated GPU hours and provisioned throughput have different cost models. Each PTU represents reserved capacity; tokens per minute depend on the model and token type. Together announced $800M in Series C funding on July 1, 2026; this does not guarantee endpoint availability or service levels. |
| GPU choice (1–10) | ||
| GPU choice (1–10) | 2/10 | Winner: 3/10 |
| Time-to-serving (editorial) (1–10) | ||
| Time-to-serving (editorial) (1–10) | Winner: 10/10 | 9/10 |
| Price clarity (1–10) | ||
| Price clarity (1–10) | 6/10 | Winner: 7/10 |
| Production ops (1–10) | ||
| Production ops (1–10) | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Open-model breadth (1–10) | ||
| Open-model breadth (1–10) | 6/10 | Winner: 9/10 |
Chart
Fit scores on the decision axes
Editorial 1–10 ratings for this pair only — not live pricing or latency benchmarks.
GPU choice
Pick exact GPUs
Time-to-serving (editorial)
Warm-path fit
Price clarity
Easy to forecast
Production ops
Less DIY ops
Open-model breadth
Catalog depth
Scores are editorial planning ratings (1–10) for product shape — not published $/hour quotes or vendor SLAs. Verify current pricing on each provider site.
How to decide
Prefer Groq when latency-sensitive chat, agents, and batch inference on groq’s supported model set. Prefer Together AI when serving open-weight models without operating your own gpu fleet. If those statements both feel true, rent a GPU for control and keep a managed API for peak traffic — do not force one product to do both jobs.
Common questions
Groq vs Together AI
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.