Skip to main content
AI Choice Engine

GPU comparison

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (72GB) vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Compared on the specs that decide a purchase: memory, bandwidth, power, and which workloads each card actually fits — gaming, creative, or local models when that is the job.

Specifications verified September 26, 2026. Launch MSRP is not today's price — in September 2026 the memory shortage pushed street prices 1.2×–3× above it; the notes row below carries a dated lowest UK/US price where we have one.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (72GB)

NVIDIA

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (72GB)

72GB VRAM · 1344 GB/s

vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

NVIDIA

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

96GB VRAM · 1792 GB/s

Amazon UK search links are provided for current availability; no affiliate programme is currently configured, and no live price is claimed here. Affiliate disclosure.

GPU specification, memory, bandwidth, and price comparison
SpecificationRTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (72GB)RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
VendorNVIDIANVIDIA
Memory72GBWinner: 96GB
Usable for a model72GBWinner: 96GB
Bandwidth1344 GB/sWinner: 1792 GB/s
Segmentworkstationworkstation
ReleasedNot verifiedUnverifiedMarch 18, 2025
Launch MSRPNo launch MSRP published~$8,565~£6,344
Notes14,080 CUDA cores, 72GB GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus at 1,344 GB/s in a 300W card (a 48GB version also exists). Fills the gap between 48GB Ada and the 96GB PRO 6000: holds 70B at Q4 with context room. Retail from ~$9,209 (Tom's Hardware, Sep 2026); no launch MSRP is shown.Workstation Edition: 96GB GDDR7 ECC, ~1.8 TB/s, 600W dual-flow cooler. Launch MSRP stays $8,565 in the DualPrice column. NVIDIA marketplace listed $16,000 (VideoCardz 2026-08-12); Tom's Hardware put retail at $15,599 on 2026-09-14. Treat marketplace/street as the buy number, not launch MSRP. RunPod rents it from $1.69/hr (Community) / $2.09 (Secure) — the rent-first alternative. This is the single-card path for ~70B+ local models that consumer 32GB cards cannot host.
UK street priceSearch Amazon (opens in new tab)Search Amazon (opens in new tab)

Local models

What each card can actually run

Computed from published VRAM and the memory each model needs at Q4, including runtime overhead.

Local model fit comparison for both GPUs
ModelRTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (72GB)RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
Qwen 3 4B4B parametersFitsFits
Qwen 3.8 27B27B parametersFitsFits
Gemma 4 31B31B parametersFitsFits
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct8B parametersFitsFits
Qwen 3 14B14B parametersFitsFits
Gemma 3 27B27B parametersFitsFits
Qwen 3 30B-A3B30B parametersFitsFits
Qwen 3 32B32B parametersFitsFits
Llama 3.3 70B70B parametersFitsFits
Muse Glimmer 30B30B parametersFitsFits
Mixtral 8x22B141B parametersDoes not fitTight
Qwen 3 235B-A22B235B parametersDoes not fitDoes not fit
Qwen 3 Coder 480B-A35B480B parametersDoes not fitDoes not fit
DeepSeek V4-Flash284B parametersDoes not fitDoes not fit

Common questions

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (72GB) vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.

Which is better for high-refresh gaming, RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (72GB) or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell?
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has more memory bandwidth — 1792 GB/s against 1344 GB/s. That usually helps high-refresh 1440p and 4K once VRAM is sufficient for your settings. Still verify with dated independent tests for the games you play.
Which has more VRAM for gaming and creative work, RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (72GB) or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell?
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell — 96GB usable against 72GB on RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (72GB). Extra memory helps texture mods, video timelines, and 3D scenes before it helps esports frame rates.
For local inference only — which holds larger models, RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (72GB) or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell?
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell. With 96GB usable against 72GB it additionally holds Mixtral 8x22B at Q4.
For local inference only — is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (72GB) or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell faster at generating tokens?
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, at 1792 GB/s against 1344 GB/s — roughly 1.3× the memory bandwidth. Bandwidth is the practical ceiling on token throughput once a model fits, but it only matters if the model fits in the first place.
For local inference only — can either run a 70B model?
Both can, at Q4 — a 70B model needs about 48GB including runtime overhead, and both have the memory for it. Expect little headroom for long context on either.

If one card holds a model the other cannot, that capacity difference usually outweighs a bandwidth advantage. A model that spills to system memory can be substantially slower, but the actual impact depends on the backend, transfer path, context, and workload.