Agentic harness comparison
Amp vs Claude Code
Amp and Claude Code offer terminal agent workflows with different subscription and usage terms. Compare the chosen credential, included allowance, additional charges, permission mode and provider requirements before a pilot.
Details last verified October 2, 2026
Amp
Amp
Terminal + web + beta macOS/iOS apps · Agentic
Anthropic
Claude Code
Terminal, IDE plugins, desktop, and browser · Agentic
| Specification | Amp | Claude Code |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ||
| Vendor | Amp | Anthropic |
| Runs in | ||
| Runs in | Terminal + web + beta macOS/iOS apps | Terminal, IDE plugins, desktop, and browser |
| Editor support | ||
| Editor support | Any terminal, Web Orbs, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Zed, Neovim | Terminal CLI, VS Code / Cursor, JetBrains, Desktop app, claude.ai/code |
| Autonomy | ||
| Autonomy | Agentic | Agentic |
| Pricing model | ||
| Pricing model | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Requires changing editor | ||
| Requires changing editor | No | No |
Dates refer to the linked source’s publication or capture unless it explicitly states when the benchmark was measured. Values we could not confirm are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Amp
Amp Frontier Corporation's coding agent runs locally in its CLI, in cloud Orbs, or on connected runners, with web and beta macOS/iOS apps sharing threads.
Best for
- Terminal and cloud agent workflows
- Teams reviewing model routing and permissions
- Cross-device threads with explicit visibility controls
Watch out
Hobby is free client access/BYOK or linked subscriptions with paid Orbs; Individual Megawatt is $20/month with 45,000 weighted Orb minutes; Teams adds no extra charge and Enterprise is custom. Gigawatt price and exact included agent allowance are not established by these public pages. Education is $10/month for eligible students/teachers; the captured page does not confirm an extra $10 credit grant. Non-enterprise paid-credit inference has no provider API markup; non-model tools can also charge credits, purchased credits expire after 12 months, and included usage does not roll over. Orbs bill by minute: a1 sizes $0.08–$2.13/hour, largest restricted, and pause after both 5 minutes without agent work and 20 minutes without interaction; idle services do not themselves keep an Orb awake. Mode routing can be pinned: ChatGPT linking alone does not convert every role, and ultra keeps Amp routing. Tools require no approval by default; custom policy plugins are the current control, not an assumed legacy permission mode. Workspace-project threads default shared; personal/no-project threads private, subject to admin controls. Amp-managed inference MDR has safety/legal/model exceptions, sometimes up to 30 days, and does not cover thread storage. Training is off absent explicit opt-in; Enterprise cannot enable it. BYOK/consumer-subscription terms are separate, and Fable BYOK requires retained-data workspace access. CLI docs say Windows via WSL while a native PowerShell installer exists; confirm installed-client support. Sources: https://ampcode.com/docs/pricing; https://ampcode.com/docs/the-dial; https://ampcode.com/docs/tools; https://ampcode.com/docs/orbs/sizes-and-costs; https://ampcode.com/security.
Claude Code
Anthropic's agentic coding tool runs in the terminal, supported IDEs, a desktop app and the browser. Configuration and permissions vary by surface and organisation. Subscription sign-in shares eligible Claude plan usage; Anthropic Console/API and third-party provider billing are separate paths.
Best for
- Multi-file refactors
- Migrations
- Delegated engineering tasks
Watch out
Claude Code is included with Pro, Max, Team and Enterprise; Free does not include it. Web prices: Pro $20/month or $200 billed yearly; Max 5x $100/month and Max 20x $200/month; Team Standard $25/seat/month or $20 with annual billing, Premium $125 or $100 respectively; Enterprise $20/seat/month with annual billing plus API-rate usage (https://claude.com/pricing). API credentials can bill separately from subscription usage. Model selection depends on account, user/org settings, provider and client version: default clears an override, while Anthropic API opus and sonnet resolve to Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5. Sonnet 5.5 requires v2.1.284+, Opus 5.5 v2.1.280+. Third-party provider aliases can resolve to older versions. Fable normally resolves to Fable 5.1, except Claude apps gateway sessions use Fable 5; neither is an account-type default. On Pro, Fable uses usage credits; on Max it can use up to 50% of the regular weekly allowance before additional Fable work requires usage credits. Interactive credit consent is not a guarantee for automation: non-interactive -p requests can bill credits without asking. Five-hour and weekly limits depend on plan/model; check the account usage page (https://code.claude.com/docs/en/model-config; https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11049741-what-is-the-max-plan). Native Windows supports shell tools, but Claude's sandbox is available on macOS, Linux and WSL2, not native Windows or WSL1. It is off by default and covers shell execution, not every file tool, MCP server or hook (https://code.claude.com/docs/en/sandboxing).
Common questions
Amp vs Claude Code
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Do I have to change editor to use Amp or Claude Code?
How are Amp and Claude Code priced?
Is Amp or Claude Code better for large refactors?
Will my project rules transfer between Amp and Claude Code?
Does Claude Code require a Max plan?
Do coding agents replace code review?
Should we harden MCP before rolling out a coding agent?
Is Amp free once the CLI is installed?
Next step
Which one fits
Autonomy and editor constraints decide this far more reliably than a benchmark score.
If most of your week is small, frequent edits, an assistive workflow beats delegation and an agentic harness sits idle while billing. If you regularly hand over work spanning many files, the reverse is true.
Where one tool requires changing editor and the other does not, that difference usually outweighs any capability gap across a team — rollouts fail on adoption, not capability.
“Open vendor” links use a first-party redirect for click counting. They are not commissionable partner placements unless a programme is active for that vendor. Affiliate disclosure.