Model comparison
Amazon Nova 2 Lite vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
Amazon against Anthropic, compared on context, price, and attributed benchmark results.
Recorded profile verification October 2, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Medium — see receipts below
Amazon
Amazon Nova 2 Lite
Balanced
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Balanced
| Specification | Amazon Nova 2 Lite | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | Not verifiedUnverified | 128K |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | Winner: $0.30 | $2 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | Winner: $2.50 | $10 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | Not verifiedUnverified | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | low, medium, high | low, medium, high, xhigh, max |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image, video | text, image |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | amazon.nova-2-lite-v1:0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Released | ||
| Released | December 2, 2025 | September 28, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 56 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 [max] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 [max] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 63.6 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 70.6 |
| CursorBench 4.0 [max] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | ||
| CursorBench 4.0 [max] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 55.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 64.5 |
| FrontierCode 1.1 (Main) [xhigh] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | ||
| FrontierCode 1.1 (Main) [xhigh] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 52.1 |
| OSWorld 2.1 · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | ||
| OSWorld 2.1 · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 80.1 |
Dates beside benchmark scores refer to the linked source’s publication or capture date unless that source explicitly states when it measured the result. A shared URL alone does not establish comparable runs; unverified setups are marked. Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- Source date2026-10-01
- Source date2026-10-01
- Source date2026-10-01Anthropic (vendor-reported) (with tools)
Frontier-knowledge ceiling: extremely hard multi-domain questions written to be near-impossible without deep expertise.
Comparable with caveatSubset/tool configurations (text-only vs with-tools) differ between vendors and materially change scores; must match configuration to compare.
- Source date2026-10-01
- Source date2026-10-01Artificial Analysis (independent, mini-swe-agent)
Agentic terminal work: long multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatDo not directly compare scores across Terminal-Bench versions: 4.0 revises and prunes the 3.0 task set and changes environment resources, requiring fresh trials. Within 4.0, harness, time limit, tools, sampling and resource settings must match; maintainer-agent and Artificial Analysis runs are not interchangeable.
- Source date2026-10-01Anthropic (vendor-reported)
Agentic terminal work: long multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatDo not directly compare scores across Terminal-Bench versions: 4.0 revises and prunes the 3.0 task set and changes environment resources, requiring fresh trials. Within 4.0, harness, time limit, tools, sampling and resource settings must match; maintainer-agent and Artificial Analysis runs are not interchangeable.
- Source date2026-10-01Artificial Analysis (Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback))
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check the cited source and its date.
Pricing tiers
Amazon Nova 2 Lite: Bedrock Global Standard $0.30/$2.50 per MTok, cached input $0.075 and cache writes $0. Single-region $0.33/$2.75, cached $0.0825. Global Flex/Batch $0.15/$1.25; Global Priority $0.525/$4.375, cached $0.13125. Grounding costs $0.03 per request separately. Snapshot: September 30, 2026 native offer file; regional routes, service tiers and customization have separate meters.
Claude Sonnet 5.5: Standard $2/$10 per MTok with no long-context surcharge; cache reads $0.20, 5-minute writes $2.50 and 1-hour writes $4. Batch $1/$5. US-only inference adds 10% where supported. The 300K output limit requires the Batch API beta header output-300k-2026-03-24; standard output stays 128K. Knowledge cutoff Jun 2026; retirement not sooner than September 28, 2027.
Amazon Nova 2 Lite
Amazon’s hosted Nova 2 Lite reasoning model for everyday business workflows, with a 1M-token context window.
Best for
- Document processing
- Business automation
- Bedrock integrations
Watch out
Extended thinking is optional and off by default. Low/medium/high controls apply when enabled; high forbids maxTokens, temperature and topP overrides. The model card advertises 64K output, but the high-thinking guide describes outputs exceeding 65K and sometimes reaching 128K, so no universal hard output cap is asserted. Reasoning tokens are billed as output. Use the route-specific US/EU/JP/global ID supported by your account; documents are inputs and text is generated.
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic’s newer Sonnet model for everyday coding and knowledge work at the same $2/$10 token rates as Sonnet 5.
Best for
- Everyday coding
- Document and slide creation
- Fast iteration
Watch out
Vendor scores use Anthropic's evaluation setup. between_tools turns off up-front thinking only at high effort or below. Forced tool use and non-default temperature/top_p/top_k error; older computer_20251124 and some advisors are rejected. Thinking blocks are model/conversation-bound; progress text needs a display setting that returns it. Haiku 5.5 is announced, not released as of October 1.
When the cheaper one wins
Amazon Nova 2 Lite is cheaper on output at $2.50 per million tokens against $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.5 — about 4.0×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. This compares standard short-context token rates, not total cost per accepted task. Include input, cache, context tiers, schedules, retries and review in your pilot.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: Medium
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 3/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: max output, parameter count.
- No directly aligned benchmark setup — No benchmark has matching cited sources, source dates, units, effort and recorded run details on both models.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Older of the two catalog checks was 25 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- Amazon Nova 2 Lite: AWS dated Nova 2 Lite availability (accessed 2026-10-02)
- Amazon Nova 2 Lite: AWS exact Lite card: Active, base ID, routes and rounded limits (accessed 2026-10-02)
- Amazon Nova 2 Lite: AWS Lite thinking defaults and high-effort exceptions (accessed 2026-10-02)
- Amazon Nova 2 Lite: AWS native Lite billing meters, September 30 offer (accessed 2026-10-02)
- Amazon Nova 2 Lite: Amazon Lite text/image/video input and text output (accessed 2026-10-02)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: Claude model overview — whole-profile source check October 1 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: Claude current API pricing, caching and inference geography (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: Anthropic release announcement (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: Claude Platform Sonnet 5.5 specifications (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: Claude models overview (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: Anthropic selectable effort levels (separate from adaptive thinking mode) (accessed 2026-10-01)
Related comparisons
- Amazon Nova 2 Lite vs Amazon Nova 2 Pro
- Amazon Nova 2 Lite vs Base 1
- Amazon Nova 2 Lite vs Claude Sonnet 5
- Amazon Nova 2 Lite vs SWE-1.5
- Amazon Nova 2 Lite vs SWE-1.6
- Amazon Nova 2 Lite vs SWE-1.6 Fast
Diving deeper on one model? Amazon Nova 2 Lite · Claude Sonnet 5.5
Common questions
Amazon Nova 2 Lite vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is Amazon Nova 2 Lite or Claude Sonnet 5.5 cheaper for input?
Is Amazon Nova 2 Lite or Claude Sonnet 5.5 cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, Amazon Nova 2 Lite or Claude Sonnet 5.5?
Do Amazon Nova 2 Lite and Claude Sonnet 5.5 support the same reasoning levels?
Should I use Amazon Nova 2 Lite or Claude Sonnet 5.5?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: Amazon Nova 2 Lite costs $0.30 per 1M tokens versus $2 for Claude Sonnet 5.5 — a 6.7x difference at the headline tier.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.