Skip to main content
AI Choice Engine

Model comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Mythos 5.1

Two Anthropic tiers compared on the figures that decide which one a workload actually needs.

Recorded profile verification October 1, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Medium — see receipts below

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.1

Frontier

vs

Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1

Frontier

AI model capability comparison
SpecificationClaude Fable 5.1Claude Mythos 5.1
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
TierFrontierFrontier
Context window1M1M
Max output128K128K
Input / 1M tokens$10$10
Output / 1M tokens$50$50
WeightsClosedClosed
ParametersNot verifiedUnverifiedNot verifiedUnverified
Reasoning levelslow, medium, high, xhigh, maxlow, medium, high, xhigh, max
Modalitiestext, imagetext, image
API model idclaude-fable-5-1claude-mythos-5-1
ReleasedSeptember 1, 2026September 1, 2026
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-10-0153Not verifiedUnverified
Humanity's Last Exam · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-09-0165Not verifiedUnverified
Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-09-2691.4Not verifiedUnverified
DeepSWE 1.1 · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-09-0367.4Not verifiedUnverified

Dates beside benchmark scores refer to the linked source’s publication or capture date unless that source explicitly states when it measured the result. A shared URL alone does not establish comparable runs; unverified setups are marked. Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.

Benchmark receipts

Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.

Pricing tiers

Claude Fable 5.1: Standard $10/$50 per MTok with no long-context surcharge. Cache reads $0.25, versus Fable 5's $1; 5-minute writes $12.50 and 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% where supported. Adaptive thinking is always on, default effort high; knowledge cutoff Jun 2026. Retirement not sooner than September 1, 2027.

Claude Mythos 5.1: Standard $10/$50 per MTok, sharing Fable 5.1's specifications/pricing. Cache reads $0.25; 5-minute writes $12.50 and 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% where supported. Invite-only for vetted US organisations; API ID claude-mythos-5-1. Retirement not sooner than September 1, 2027; this is a minimum commitment, not an announced shutdown.

FrontierRecord checked October 1, 2026

Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Fable 5.1 is Anthropic's model for the most demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work at $10/$50 — Anthropic now recommends Opus 5.5 as the default for most workloads.

Best for

  • Frontier agents
  • Hardest reasoning work
  • Fable 5 workloads at the same price

Watch out

Standard token rates are 2.5x Opus 5.5's. Forced tool use errors; thinking blocks are model/conversation-bound, so editing earlier turns or switching models can invalidate them. Display updates and per-message effort are beta. Match benchmark settings and evaluate pinned workloads before migrating.

FrontierRecord checked October 1, 2026

Claude Mythos 5.1

Anthropic describes Claude Mythos 5.1 as its most capable model for cybersecurity and biology research — the Fable 5.1 model with fewer cyber/bio safeguards, restricted to vetted US organisations.

Best for

  • Cyber-defence research
  • Biology research
  • Claude Security workloads

Watch out

Invite-only for vetted US organisations through trusted access programmes, with 30-day retention required by default for safety monitoring. Adaptive thinking cannot be disabled and forced tool use errors. Shared underlying model does not make Fable benchmark results Mythos observations; safeguards and access differ.

When the cheaper one wins

Both charge $50 per million output tokens at standard rates, so output price is not the split. Prefer the row whose “best for” line matches the job, then confirm the live vendor rate.

Run the model picker

Evidence confidence: Medium

How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.

  • Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
  • 4/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: parameter count.
  • No directly aligned benchmark setup — No benchmark has matching cited sources, source dates, units, effort and recorded run details on both models.
  • Verified within the last 90 days — Older of the two catalog checks was 25 days ago.
  • Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.

Source receipts

Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.

Related comparisons

Diving deeper on one model? Claude Fable 5.1 · Claude Mythos 5.1

Common questions

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Mythos 5.1

Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.

Is Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Mythos 5.1 cheaper for input?
Both list a base rate of $10 per million input tokens. Actual cost can differ with context tiers, caching, tools and other charges. Claude Fable 5.1: Standard $10/$50 per MTok with no long-context surcharge. Cache reads $0.25, versus Fable 5's $1; 5-minute writes $12.50 and 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% where supported. Adaptive thinking is always on, default effort high; knowledge cutoff Jun 2026. Retirement not sooner than September 1, 2027. Claude Mythos 5.1: Standard $10/$50 per MTok, sharing Fable 5.1's specifications/pricing. Cache reads $0.25; 5-minute writes $12.50 and 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% where supported. Invite-only for vetted US organisations; API ID claude-mythos-5-1. Retirement not sooner than September 1, 2027; this is a minimum commitment, not an announced shutdown.
Is Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Mythos 5.1 cheaper for output?
Both list a base rate of $50 per million output tokens. Actual cost can differ with context tiers, caching, tools and other charges. Claude Fable 5.1: Standard $10/$50 per MTok with no long-context surcharge. Cache reads $0.25, versus Fable 5's $1; 5-minute writes $12.50 and 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% where supported. Adaptive thinking is always on, default effort high; knowledge cutoff Jun 2026. Retirement not sooner than September 1, 2027. Claude Mythos 5.1: Standard $10/$50 per MTok, sharing Fable 5.1's specifications/pricing. Cache reads $0.25; 5-minute writes $12.50 and 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% where supported. Invite-only for vetted US organisations; API ID claude-mythos-5-1. Retirement not sooner than September 1, 2027; this is a minimum commitment, not an announced shutdown.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Mythos 5.1?
Both accept about 1M tokens of context, so document length will not decide between them.
Do Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 support the same reasoning levels?
Both expose these named effort settings: "low", "medium", "high", "xhigh", "max". The same labels do not guarantee equal compute budgets or behavior across providers. Compare quality, latency and cost on your own tasks.
Should I use Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Mythos 5.1?
Both are classified in our frontier tier; this editorial grouping does not imply equal capability. Claude Fable 5.1 is a candidate for frontier agents; Claude Mythos 5.1 is a candidate for cyber-defence research. Compare accuracy, tool reliability, latency and cost on representative tasks.

Next step

Choosing between them

The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.

These two models match on every verified catalog figure — the decision comes down to provider preference, availability, and workload fit rather than published numbers.

Run the model pickerEstimate stack costAll model comparisons

Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.