Model comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Small 4
Anthropic against Mistral, compared on context, price, and verified benchmark results.
Catalog record checked September 26, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: High — see receipts below
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Budget
Mistral
Mistral Small 4
Budget · Open weights
| Specification | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Mistral Small 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Budget | Budget |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | 200K | Winner: 262K |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | 64K | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | $1 | Winner: $0.15 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | $5 | Winner: $0.60 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | Not disclosedUnverified | 119B total / 6.5B active (MoE) |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | extended thinking (budget_tokens) | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image | text, image |
| License | ||
| License | Not disclosedUnverified | Apache 2.0 |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | mistral-small-2603 |
| Released | ||
| Released | October 15, 2025 | March 16, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-09-26) | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-09-26) | Winner: 16.9 | 11.3 |
| SWE-bench Verified (2026-02-17) | ||
| SWE-bench Verified (2026-02-17) | 66.6 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Terminal-Bench (2025-10-15) | ||
| Terminal-Bench (2025-10-15) | 40.21 | Not verifiedUnverified |
Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- 2026-09-26Artificial Analysis (Reasoning)
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check measuredAt.
- 2026-02-17SWE-bench official leaderboard (independent harness: mini-SWE-agent bash-only, $0.33/task; conflicts with vendor 73.3 — both preserved)
Real GitHub issue resolution: does the model's patch pass the hidden tests.
Comparable with caveatPost-audit vendor claims and pre-audit scores sit on different task trust levels; scaffolding (agent harness, compute budget) also dominates results. Never aggregate across scaffolds.
- 2025-10-15Anthropic — Introducing Claude Haiku 4.5 (vendor, Terminus 2, no thinking, 6 runs; 41.75 with 32K thinking)
Real GitHub issue resolution: does the model's patch pass the hidden tests.
Comparable with caveatPost-audit vendor claims and pre-audit scores sit on different task trust levels; scaffolding (agent harness, compute budget) also dominates results. Never aggregate across scaffolds.
Pricing tiers
Claude Haiku 4.5: Standard $1/$5 per MTok; cache reads 10% of base input. 200K context (vs 1M on Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5).
Mistral Small 4: Mistral first-party API $0.15/$0.60 per MTok. Open weights (Apache 2.0). 119B total / 6.5B active MoE.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic's fastest, cheapest tier for high-volume classification and extraction.
Best for
- High-volume classification
- Routine extraction
- Latency-sensitive stacks
Watch out
No adaptive thinking (manual extended thinking via budget_tokens only); 200K context. Anthropic lists 2026-10-15 as the earliest possible retirement date, and Haiku 5.5 is announced but not released.
Mistral Small 4
Mistral Small 4 is Mistral's low-cost Apache-2.0 MoE — 6.5B active parameters with a 256K context and image input.
Best for
- Cheap EU-hosted inference
- Open-weight self-hosting
- High-volume extraction
Watch out
Small active size: not for hard reasoning or agentic coding; max output is not published.
When the cheaper one wins
Mistral Small 4 is cheaper on output at $0.60 per million tokens against $5 for Claude Haiku 4.5 — about 8.3×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: High
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 2/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: max output, parameter count, reasoning levels.
- 1 shared named benchmark with differing scores — Measured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Newest catalog check was 2 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- Claude Haiku 4.5: Anthropic — Claude Haiku 4.5 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: Anthropic pricing (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Mistral Small 4: Mistral docs — Mistral Small 4 (26.03) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Mistral Small 4: Mistral changelog (accessed 2026-09-26)
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Mythos 5.1
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5
Diving deeper on one model? Claude Haiku 4.5 · Mistral Small 4
Common questions
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Small 4
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Mistral Small 4 cheaper for input?
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Mistral Small 4 cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Mistral Small 4?
Should I use Claude Haiku 4.5 or Mistral Small 4?
Can I self-host Claude Haiku 4.5 or Mistral Small 4?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: Mistral Small 4 costs $0.15 per 1M tokens versus $1 for Claude Haiku 4.5 — a 6.7x difference at the headline tier.
- Context: Mistral Small 4 takes 262K against 200K for Claude Haiku 4.5 — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
- Deployment: Mistral Small 4 publishes weights you can self-host; the other is API-only.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.