Model comparison
Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
Anthropic against Google, compared on context, price, and attributed benchmark results.
Recorded profile verification October 1, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Medium — see receipts below
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5
Frontier
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Balanced
| Specification | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Frontier | Balanced |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | 1M | Winner: 1.05M |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | Winner: 128K | 66K |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | $5 | Winner: $0.75 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | $25 | Winner: $3.75 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | Not verifiedUnverified | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | low, medium, high, xhigh, max | minimal, low, medium, high |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image | text, image, video, audio, pdf |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | claude-opus-5 | gemini-3.6-flash |
| Released | ||
| Released | July 24, 2026 | July 21, 2026 |
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date Claude Opus 5: 2026-09-01 | ||
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date Claude Opus 5: 2026-09-01 | 63.6 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Claude Opus 5: 2026-09-02 | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Claude Opus 5: 2026-09-02 | 89.1 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2026-07 | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2026-07 | Not verifiedUnverified | 78 |
| DeepSWE 1.1 · source date Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2026-08 | ||
| DeepSWE 1.1 · source date Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2026-08 | Not verifiedUnverified | 48.6 |
| HLE-Verified · source date Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2026-08 | ||
| HLE-Verified · source date Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2026-08 | Not verifiedUnverified | 51.2 |
Dates beside benchmark scores refer to the linked source’s publication or capture date unless that source explicitly states when it measured the result. A shared URL alone does not establish comparable runs; unverified setups are marked. Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- Source date2026-09-02Google Gemini 3.8 Flash evaluation table quoting public leaderboard / Artificial Analysis, Terminus 2; not a Google-run Opus evaluation (Cross-provider quotation; common effort and experiment date unverified)
Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatNot comparable with Terminal-Bench 3.0 or 4.0 (different task sets) or v1; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
- Source date2026-09-01Anthropic Fable 5.1 comparison table (vendor, with tools; 56.6 no tools)
Frontier-knowledge ceiling: extremely hard multi-domain questions written to be near-impossible without deep expertise.
Comparable with caveatSubset/tool configurations (text-only vs with-tools) differ between vendors and materially change scores; must match configuration to compare.
- Source date2026-08Google DeepMind model evaluation report (vendor; full 1,811-item HLE-Verified set) (Full 1,811-item verified/revised set; differs from original HLE and AA text-only HLE)
Expert reasoning on the verified and revised Humanity's Last Exam question set.
UnknownA distinct question set from original HLE and Artificial Analysis's text-only HLE. Shared dataset and publisher alone do not establish matching model effort, tools, filtering and run configuration; no quality winner is inferred without that evidence.
- Source date2026-08Google DeepMind August 3.7 evaluation report (quoting Datacurve for 3.6 Flash, 48.6%) (High thinking; quoted Datacurve result; July 3.6 report rounds to 49%)
Agentic software engineering: pass@1 on real repo tasks with reported cost per completed task.
Directly comparable
- Source date2026-07Google DeepMind model evaluation report (vendor, Terminus-2 harness)
Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatNot comparable with Terminal-Bench 3.0 or 4.0 (different task sets) or v1; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
Pricing tiers
Claude Opus 5: Standard $5/$25 per MTok with no long-context surcharge. Cache reads $0.50; 5-minute writes $6.25 and 1-hour writes $10. Batch $2.50/$12.50. First-party Fast research preview $10/$50, unavailable with Batch. US-only inference adds 10% where supported. Batch 300K output requires output-300k-2026-03-24; standard stays 128K. Knowledge cutoff May 2026; retirement not sooner than July 24, 2027.
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Intro Standard $0.75/$3.75 per MTok through December 31, 2026; $1.50/$7.50 from January 1, 2027. Output includes thinking tokens. Cached input $0.075, rising to $0.15; storage $0.50/MTok-hour, rising to $1. Batch/Flex input/output are $0.375/$1.875, rising to $0.75/$3.75. Priority $1.35/$6.75, rising to $2.70/$13.50. Grounding tools have separate charges and quotas; free-tier limits differ from paid.
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 is Anthropic's July 2026 agentic-coding model, now 'Active (legacy)'. Its successor Opus 5.5 has lower base input/output prices ($4/$20 vs $5/$25 per million tokens); performance depends on the workload and evaluation settings.
Best for
- Complex agentic coding
- Enterprise work
- Long-context analysis
Watch out
Active legacy, superseded by Opus 5.5. Test migration: Opus 5.5 makes adaptive thinking always on, rejects forced tool use and the older computer-use tool, and changes thinking-block/progress behavior. Partner cloud lifecycles and prices can differ.
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Gemini 3.6 Flash is Google's balanced multimodal Flash tier with a 1M-token context.
Best for
- Multimodal pipelines
- High-volume processing
- Video and audio input
Watch out
An earlier Flash model, still listed as stable. Google reports improvements on selected tasks for later releases; that does not establish a quality increase for every workload. Thinking includes minimal through high; computer use is Preview. Intro pricing doubles January 1, 2027.
When the cheaper one wins
Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper on output at $3.75 per million tokens against $25 for Claude Opus 5 — about 6.7×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. On DeepSWE 1.1, Gemini 3.6 Flash is 46.7% Pass@1 at $4.42/task versus Claude Opus 5 at 73.6% / $11.84/task. This compares standard short-context token rates, not total cost per accepted task. Include input, cache, context tiers, schedules, retries and review in your pilot.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: Medium
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 4/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: parameter count.
- No directly aligned benchmark setup — No benchmark has matching cited sources, source dates, units, effort and recorded run details on both models.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Older of the two catalog checks was 25 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- Claude Opus 5: Claude model overview — whole-profile source check October 1 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Opus 5: Claude current API pricing, caching and inference geography (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Opus 5: Anthropic — Claude Opus 5 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Claude Opus 5: Anthropic news — Claude Opus 5 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Claude Opus 5: Anthropic — Claude Opus 5.5 (Opus 5 successor) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Claude Opus 5: Anthropic selectable effort levels (separate from adaptive thinking mode) (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Gemini 3.6 Flash: Google primary profile — whole-record source check October 1 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Gemini 3.6 Flash: Gemini current API pricing and cache-storage tiers (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Gemini 3.6 Flash: Gemini thinking — model-specific Interactions levels (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Gemini 3.6 Flash: Google — Gemini 3.6 Flash (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Gemini 3.6 Flash: Google Cloud Gemini pricing (accessed 2026-08-29)
Related comparisons
- Amazon Nova 2 Lite vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
- Amazon Nova 2 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
- Base 1 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 5
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5
Diving deeper on one model? Claude Opus 5 · Gemini 3.6 Flash
Common questions
Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 3.6 Flash cheaper for input?
Is Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 3.6 Flash cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Do Claude Opus 5 and Gemini 3.6 Flash support the same reasoning levels?
Should I use Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $0.75 per 1M tokens versus $5 for Claude Opus 5 — a 6.7x difference at the headline tier.
- Context: Gemini 3.6 Flash takes 1.05M against 1M for Claude Opus 5 — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
- Positioning: Claude Opus 5 sits in the frontier tier, Gemini 3.6 Flash in the balanced tier. Compare accuracy, reliability, latency, and cost on representative tasks before choosing.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.