Skip to main content
AI Choice EngineAI Choice Engine

Model comparison

Cohere Command A+ vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

Cohere against DeepSeek, compared on context, price, and verified benchmark results.

Catalog record checked September 4, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: High — see receipts below

Cohere

Cohere Command A+

Balanced · Open weights

vs

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash

Balanced · Open weights

AI model capability comparison
SpecificationCohere Command A+DeepSeek V4 Flash
ProviderCohereDeepSeek
TierBalancedBalanced
Context window128KWinner: 1M
Max outputNot verifiedUnverified384K
Input / 1M tokens$0.80Winner: $0.44
Output / 1M tokens$3.20Winner: $1.32
WeightsOpenOpen
Parameters218B total / 25B active (sparse MoE)284B total / 13B active (MoE)
Reasoning levelslow, medium, highlow, high, max
Modalitiestexttext
LicenseApache 2.0MIT
API model idCohereLabs/command-a-plus-05-2026deepseek-v4-flash
ReleasedMay 20, 2026April 24, 2026
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-08-14)43Winner: 49
SWE-bench Verified (2026-04-24)Not verifiedUnverified79
GPQA Diamond (2026-04-24)Not verifiedUnverified88.1
Humanity's Last Exam (2026-04-24)Not verifiedUnverified45.1
MMLU-Pro (2026-04-24)Not verifiedUnverified86.2

Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.

Benchmark receipts

  • 2026-08-14: Artificial AnalysisComposite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score. Comparability: directly comparable — AA occasionally rebaselines the index scale between snapshots — a score captured on one date is only comparable to same-snapshot scores (check measuredAt).
  • 2026-04-24: DeepSeek family HF model card (vendor, Think Max, exact match)Real GitHub issue resolution: does the model's patch pass the hidden tests. Comparability: comparable with caveat — Post-audit vendor claims and pre-audit scores sit on different task trust levels; scaffolding (agent harness, compute budget) also dominates results. Never aggregate across scaffolds.

Pricing tiers: Cohere Command A+: Azure-hosted Global rate $0.80/$3.20 per MTok (effective 2026-07-01; Data Zone $0.88/$3.52). Cohere-direct publishes no per-token price: open weights (Apache 2.0), a free rate-limited trial API, and Model Vault/enterprise licensing. Cohere calls it the last model in the Command A family. 218B/25B active sparse MoE. · DeepSeek V4 Flash: Official peak rates $0.44/$1.32 per MTok; off-peak $0.22/$0.66 (cache hit $0.014). Open weights (MIT). 284B/13B active MoE.

BalancedOpen weightsRecord checked September 4, 2026

Cohere Command A+

Command A+ is Cohere's open-weight (Apache 2.0) 218B/25B sparse MoE for enterprise use.

Best for

  • Open-weight deployments
  • Enterprise RAG
  • Tool use

Watch out

The $0.80/$3.20 figure is the Azure-hosted rate, not a Cohere-direct price — Cohere itself sells licenses and a free rate-limited trial, so budget by deployment path.

BalancedOpen weightsRecord checked September 3, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the efficient open-weight (MIT) sibling of V4 Pro with a 1M-token context.

Best for

  • Open-weight deployments
  • Cost-sensitive inference
  • High-volume serving

Watch out

Peak/off-peak billing means the hour you run matters; off-peak is half price.

When the cheaper one wins

DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on output at $1.32 per million tokens against $3.20 for Cohere Command A+ — about 2.4×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.

Run the model picker

Evidence confidence: High

How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.

  • Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
  • 4/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: max output.
  • 1 shared named benchmark with differing scores — Measured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
  • Verified within the last 90 days — Newest catalog check was 7 days ago.
  • Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.

Source receipts

Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.

Related comparisons

Diving deeper on one model? Cohere Command A+ · DeepSeek V4 Flash

Common questions

Cohere Command A+ vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.

Is Cohere Command A+ or DeepSeek V4 Flash cheaper for input?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper at $0.44 per million input tokens, against $0.80 for Cohere Command A+ — roughly 1.8× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; Cohere Command A+ has tiered pricing: Azure-hosted Global rate $0.80/$3.20 per MTok (effective 2026-07-01; Data Zone $0.88/$3.52). Cohere-direct publishes no per-token price: open weights (Apache 2.0), a free rate-limited trial API, and Model Vault/enterprise licensing. Cohere calls it the last model in the Command A family. 218B/25B active sparse MoE. DeepSeek V4 Flash has tiered pricing: Official peak rates $0.44/$1.32 per MTok; off-peak $0.22/$0.66 (cache hit $0.014). Open weights (MIT). 284B/13B active MoE.

Is Cohere Command A+ or DeepSeek V4 Flash cheaper for output?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper at $1.32 per million output tokens, against $3.20 for Cohere Command A+ — roughly 2.4× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; Cohere Command A+ has tiered pricing: Azure-hosted Global rate $0.80/$3.20 per MTok (effective 2026-07-01; Data Zone $0.88/$3.52). Cohere-direct publishes no per-token price: open weights (Apache 2.0), a free rate-limited trial API, and Model Vault/enterprise licensing. Cohere calls it the last model in the Command A family. 218B/25B active sparse MoE. DeepSeek V4 Flash has tiered pricing: Official peak rates $0.44/$1.32 per MTok; off-peak $0.22/$0.66 (cache hit $0.014). Open weights (MIT). 284B/13B active MoE.

Which has the larger context window, Cohere Command A+ or DeepSeek V4 Flash?

DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts 1M tokens against 128K for Cohere Command A+. This only matters if you routinely send very long documents or large codebases.

Do Cohere Command A+ and DeepSeek V4 Flash support the same reasoning levels?

Cohere Command A+ exposes low, medium, high, while DeepSeek V4 Flash exposes low, high, max.

Should I use Cohere Command A+ or DeepSeek V4 Flash?

Both sit in the balanced tier, so the choice usually comes down to price and context rather than capability. Cohere Command A+ suits open-weight deployments; DeepSeek V4 Flash suits open-weight deployments.

Next step

Choosing between them

The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.

  • Input price: DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.44 per 1M tokens versus $0.80 for Cohere Command A+ — a 1.8x difference at the headline tier.
  • Context: DeepSeek V4 Flash takes 1M against 128K for Cohere Command A+ — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
  • Measured capability: DeepSeek V4 Flash leads Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 49 to 43 (measured 2026-08-14).
Run the model pickerEstimate stack costAll model comparisons

Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.