Model comparison
GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.2
Z.ai against OpenAI, compared on context, price, and verified benchmark results.
Catalog record checked September 3, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: High — see receipts below
Z.ai
GLM 5.2
Balanced · Open weights
OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Balanced
| Specification | GLM 5.2 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai | OpenAI |
| Tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Context window | Winner: 1M | 400K |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Input / 1M tokens | Winner: $1.40 | $1.75 |
| Output / 1M tokens | Winner: $4.40 | $14 |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Parameters | open MoE | Not disclosedUnverified |
| Reasoning levels | low, high, max | none, low, medium, high, xhigh, max |
| Modalities | text | text, image |
| API model id | glm-5.2 | gpt-5.2 |
| Released | March 15, 2026 | December 11, 2025 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-08-14) | 50 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [high] (2026-08-14) | Not verifiedUnverified | 50 |
Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
- 2026-08-14: Artificial AnalysisComposite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score. Comparability: directly comparable — AA occasionally rebaselines the index scale between snapshots — a score captured on one date is only comparable to same-snapshot scores (check measuredAt).
Pricing tiers: GLM 5.2: Z.ai's per-token table lists $1.40/$4.40 per MTok (same list as 5.3). Open-weight, text-only; 1M context, 128K max output per Z.ai docs. · GPT-5.2: Standard $1.75/$14 per MTok; cached input $0.175/MTok; batch $0.875/$7. (gpt-5.2-pro exists at $21/$168.)
GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2 is Zhipu's previous-generation open-weight model with strong cost-performance.
Best for
- Open-weight deployments
- Reasoning
- Cost-sensitive work
Watch out
Superseded by GLM 5.3 (Coding Plan 5.2/5.1 requests route to 5.3). Parameter count: sources disagree.
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 was OpenAI's previous flagship — still a strong, widely integrated general model at $1.75/$14.
Best for
- General production
- Agentic workflows
- Knowledge work
Watch out
Two generations behind GPT-5.6; capable but no longer flagship.
When the cheaper one wins
GLM 5.2 is cheaper on output at $4.40 per million tokens against $14 for GPT-5.2 — about 3.2×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: High
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 4/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: parameter count.
- 1 shared named benchmark (scores match) — Measured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index — scores are equivalent, so the benchmark does not separate the pair.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Newest catalog check was 8 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- GLM 5.2: HuggingFace — Z.ai (GLM) (accessed 2026-08-29)
- GLM 5.2: Z.ai (accessed 2026-08-29)
- GPT-5.2: OpenAI — Introducing GPT-5.2 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- GPT-5.2: OpenAI API pricing (gpt-5.2 $1.75/$14) (accessed 2026-08-29)
Related comparisons
Common questions
GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.2
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is GLM 5.2 or GPT-5.2 cheaper for input?
GLM 5.2 is cheaper at $1.40 per million input tokens, against $1.75 for GPT-5.2 — roughly 1.3× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; GLM 5.2 has tiered pricing: Z.ai's per-token table lists $1.40/$4.40 per MTok (same list as 5.3). Open-weight, text-only; 1M context, 128K max output per Z.ai docs. GPT-5.2 has tiered pricing: Standard $1.75/$14 per MTok; cached input $0.175/MTok; batch $0.875/$7. (gpt-5.2-pro exists at $21/$168.)
Is GLM 5.2 or GPT-5.2 cheaper for output?
GLM 5.2 is cheaper at $4.40 per million output tokens, against $14 for GPT-5.2 — roughly 3.2× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; GLM 5.2 has tiered pricing: Z.ai's per-token table lists $1.40/$4.40 per MTok (same list as 5.3). Open-weight, text-only; 1M context, 128K max output per Z.ai docs. GPT-5.2 has tiered pricing: Standard $1.75/$14 per MTok; cached input $0.175/MTok; batch $0.875/$7. (gpt-5.2-pro exists at $21/$168.)
Which has the larger context window, GLM 5.2 or GPT-5.2?
GLM 5.2 accepts 1M tokens against 400K for GPT-5.2. This only matters if you routinely send very long documents or large codebases.
Do GLM 5.2 and GPT-5.2 support the same reasoning levels?
GLM 5.2 exposes low, high, max, while GPT-5.2 exposes none, low, medium, high, xhigh, max.
Should I use GLM 5.2 or GPT-5.2?
Both sit in the balanced tier, so the choice usually comes down to price and context rather than capability. GLM 5.2 suits open-weight deployments; GPT-5.2 suits general production.
Can I self-host GLM 5.2 or GPT-5.2?
GLM 5.2 publishes open weights, but self-hosting and third-party provider access depend on the licence, hardware, serving support, and availability. GPT-5.2 is a closed model whose supported access paths are controlled by its provider.
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: GLM 5.2 costs $1.40 per 1M tokens versus $1.75 for GPT-5.2 — a 1.3x difference at the headline tier.
- Context: GLM 5.2 takes 1M against 400K for GPT-5.2 — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
- Deployment: GLM 5.2 publishes weights you can self-host; the other is API-only.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.