Model comparison
GPT-5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Two OpenAI tiers compared on the figures that decide which one a workload actually needs.
Catalog record checked September 3, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: High — see receipts below
OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Balanced
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna
Budget
| Specification | GPT-5.2 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Tier | Balanced | Budget |
| Context window | 400K | Winner: 1.05M |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Input / 1M tokens | $1.75 | Winner: $0.20 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $14 | Winner: $1.20 |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Parameters | Not disclosedUnverified | cheapest GPT-5.6 tier |
| Reasoning levels | none, low, medium, high, xhigh, max | none, low, medium, high |
| Modalities | text, image | text, image |
| API model id | gpt-5.2 | gpt-5.6-luna |
| Released | December 11, 2025 | July 9, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [high] (2026-08-14) | Winner: 50 | 47 |
| SWE-bench Verified (2026-09-01) | Not verifiedUnverified | 93 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (2026-07-09) | Not verifiedUnverified | 84.7 |
| LiveBench (2026-09-05) | Not verifiedUnverified | 73.6 |
Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
- 2026-09-05: LiveBench official leaderboard (benchmark-owned), max effortContamination-resistant general capability across reasoning, coding, math, data analysis, and language, with monthly question refreshes. Comparability: comparable with caveat — Rolling question set: observations months apart measure different question mixes. Record the measurement date and compare within ~1 month windows.
- 2026-09-01: vals.ai SWE-bench Verified leaderboard (independent, mini-swe-agent bash-only) (independent; OpenAI did not report SWE-bench Verified for the GPT-5.6 family)Real GitHub issue resolution: does the model's patch pass the hidden tests. Comparability: comparable with caveat — Post-audit vendor claims and pre-audit scores sit on different task trust levels; scaffolding (agent harness, compute budget) also dominates results. Never aggregate across scaffolds.
- 2026-08-14: Artificial AnalysisComposite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score. Comparability: directly comparable — AA occasionally rebaselines the index scale between snapshots — a score captured on one date is only comparable to same-snapshot scores (check measuredAt).
- 2026-07-09: OpenAI GPT-5.6 announcement (vendor; chart transcribed by Vellum)Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment. Comparability: comparable with caveat — Scores across Terminal-Bench major versions (v1 vs v2) are NOT comparable; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
Pricing tiers: GPT-5.2: Standard $1.75/$14 per MTok; cached input $0.175/MTok; batch $0.875/$7. (gpt-5.2-pro exists at $21/$168.) · GPT-5.6 Luna: Launch list was $1/$6; cut to $0.20/$1.20 on 2026-07-30. Cached input $0.02/MTok; batch $0.10/$0.60.
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 was OpenAI's previous flagship — still a strong, widely integrated general model at $1.75/$14.
Best for
- General production
- Agentic workflows
- Knowledge work
Watch out
Two generations behind GPT-5.6; capable but no longer flagship.
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna is OpenAI's cheapest tier — roughly 1/25 of Opus 5-class input cost, suitable where quality requirements are modest.
Best for
- Classification
- High-volume chat
- Latency-sensitive pipelines
Watch out
Smallest GPT-5.6 tier; verify quality holds before routing frontier work to it.
When the cheaper one wins
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper on output at $1.20 per million tokens against $14 for GPT-5.2 — about 12×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: High
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 4/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: parameter count.
- 1 shared named benchmark with differing scores — Measured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Newest catalog check was 8 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- GPT-5.2: OpenAI — Introducing GPT-5.2 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- GPT-5.2: OpenAI API pricing (gpt-5.2 $1.75/$14) (accessed 2026-08-29)
- GPT-5.6 Luna: OpenAI — GPT-5.6 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- GPT-5.6 Luna: OpenAI API pricing (gpt-5.6-luna $0.20/$1.20) (accessed 2026-08-29)
Related comparisons
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna
- DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna
- Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna
- Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna
- GPT-5.6 Luna vs Grok 4.6
- Amazon Nova 2 Pro vs GPT-5.2
Diving deeper on one model? GPT-5.2 · GPT-5.6 Luna
Common questions
GPT-5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is GPT-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Luna cheaper for input?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper at $0.20 per million input tokens, against $1.75 for GPT-5.2 — roughly 8.8× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; GPT-5.2 has tiered pricing: Standard $1.75/$14 per MTok; cached input $0.175/MTok; batch $0.875/$7. (gpt-5.2-pro exists at $21/$168.) GPT-5.6 Luna has tiered pricing: Launch list was $1/$6; cut to $0.20/$1.20 on 2026-07-30. Cached input $0.02/MTok; batch $0.10/$0.60.
Is GPT-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Luna cheaper for output?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper at $1.20 per million output tokens, against $14 for GPT-5.2 — roughly 12× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; GPT-5.2 has tiered pricing: Standard $1.75/$14 per MTok; cached input $0.175/MTok; batch $0.875/$7. (gpt-5.2-pro exists at $21/$168.) GPT-5.6 Luna has tiered pricing: Launch list was $1/$6; cut to $0.20/$1.20 on 2026-07-30. Cached input $0.02/MTok; batch $0.10/$0.60.
Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna accepts 1.05M tokens against 400K for GPT-5.2. This only matters if you routinely send very long documents or large codebases.
Do GPT-5.2 and GPT-5.6 Luna support the same reasoning levels?
GPT-5.2 exposes none, low, medium, high, xhigh, max, while GPT-5.6 Luna exposes none, low, medium, high.
Should I use GPT-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.2 is the balanced tier and GPT-5.6 Luna the budget tier. The useful question is whether your hardest task actually fails on the cheaper one — most production volume such as classification, extraction and summarisation does not.
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: GPT-5.6 Luna costs $0.20 per 1M tokens versus $1.75 for GPT-5.2 — a 8.8x difference at the headline tier.
- Context: GPT-5.6 Luna takes 1.05M against 400K for GPT-5.2 — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
- Measured capability: GPT-5.2 leads Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 50 to 47 (measured 2026-08-14).
- Positioning: GPT-5.2 sits in the balanced tier, GPT-5.6 Luna in the budget tier — most production volume (classification, extraction, summarisation) does not need the pricier tier.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.