Model comparison
GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6 Luna
Two OpenAI tiers compared on the figures that decide which one a workload actually needs.
Catalog record checked September 26, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: High — see receipts below
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna
Budget
OpenAI
GPT-6 Luna
Budget
| Specification | GPT-5.6 Luna | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Budget | Budget |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.20 | Winner: $0.10 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.20 | Winner: $0.50 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | previous-generation GPT-5.6 small tier | GPT-6 low-cost tier |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | none, low, medium, high, xhigh, max | none, low, medium, high, xhigh, max |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image | text, image |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | gpt-5.6-luna | gpt-6-luna |
| Released | ||
| Released | July 9, 2026 | September 22, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] (2026-09-26) | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] (2026-09-26) | 37.3 | 37.3 |
| SWE-bench Verified (2026-09-01) | ||
| SWE-bench Verified (2026-09-01) | 93 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (2026-07-09) | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (2026-07-09) | 84.7 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| LiveBench (2026-09-05) | ||
| LiveBench (2026-09-05) | 73.6 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| DeepSWE 1.1 [max] (2026-09-22) | ||
| DeepSWE 1.1 [max] (2026-09-22) | Not verifiedUnverified | 66.6 |
Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- 2026-09-26Artificial Analysis
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check measuredAt.
- 2026-09-22OpenAI — Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna (vendor; not yet on Datacurve's board)
Agentic software engineering: pass@1 on real repo tasks with reported cost per completed task.
Directly comparable
- 2026-09-05LiveBench official leaderboard (benchmark-owned), max effort
Contamination-resistant general capability across reasoning, coding, math, data analysis, and language, with monthly question refreshes.
Comparable with caveatRolling question set: observations months apart measure different question mixes. Record the measurement date and compare within ~1 month windows.
- 2026-09-01vals.ai SWE-bench Verified leaderboard (independent, mini-swe-agent bash-only) (independent; OpenAI did not report SWE-bench Verified for the GPT-5.6 family)
Real GitHub issue resolution: does the model's patch pass the hidden tests.
Comparable with caveatPost-audit vendor claims and pre-audit scores sit on different task trust levels; scaffolding (agent harness, compute budget) also dominates results. Never aggregate across scaffolds.
- 2026-07-09OpenAI GPT-5.6 announcement (vendor; chart transcribed by Vellum)
Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatNot comparable with Terminal-Bench 3.0 or 4.0 (different task sets) or v1; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
Pricing tiers
GPT-5.6 Luna: Launch list was $1/$6; cut to $0.20/$1.20 on 2026-07-30. Above 272K input the whole request bills 2x input / 1.5x output. Cached input $0.02/MTok; cache writes 1.25x input; batch $0.10/$0.60.
GPT-6 Luna: Direct successor to GPT-5.6 Luna at half the price. Cached input $0.01/MTok; cache writes $0.125. Above 272K input the whole request bills $0.20/$0.75 ($0.02 cached). Batch/Flex $0.05/$0.25; Fast mode $0.20/$1.00. Knowledge cutoff May 18 2026.
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna was OpenAI's cheapest GPT-5.6 tier; GPT-6 Luna replaced it on 2026-09-22 at half the price ($0.10/$0.50).
Best for
- Classification
- High-volume chat
- Latency-sensitive pipelines
Watch out
Superseded by GPT-6 Luna, which costs half as much and matches it on the Artificial Analysis index; still served, not deprecated.
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna is OpenAI's cheapest current model at $0.10/$0.50 — the direct successor to GPT-5.6 Luna at half the price, with the full 1.05M-token context.
Best for
- High-volume chat and extraction
- Classification
- Cost-capped agent loops
Watch out
Small tier: it matches GPT-5.6 Luna on the Artificial Analysis index but sits well below GPT-6 Sol on hard reasoning; the DeepSWE figure is vendor-reported at max effort.
When the cheaper one wins
GPT-6 Luna is cheaper on output at $0.50 per million tokens against $1.20 for GPT-5.6 Luna — about 2.4×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: High
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 5/5 core specs verified on both sides — All core specifications verified for both models.
- 1 shared named benchmark (scores match) — Measured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index — scores are equivalent, so the benchmark does not separate the pair.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Newest catalog check was 2 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- GPT-5.6 Luna: OpenAI — GPT-5.6 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- GPT-5.6 Luna: OpenAI API pricing (gpt-5.6-luna $0.20/$1.20) (accessed 2026-08-29)
- GPT-5.6 Luna: OpenAI — Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna (GPT-5.6 Luna successor) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- GPT-6 Luna: OpenAI — Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna (accessed 2026-09-26)
- GPT-6 Luna: OpenAI model docs — gpt-6-luna (1.05M context, 128K output) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- GPT-6 Luna: OpenAI API pricing (gpt-6-luna $0.10/$0.50, cached $0.01) (accessed 2026-09-26)
Related comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna
- Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna
- GPT-6 Luna vs Grok 4.7
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Diving deeper on one model? GPT-5.6 Luna · GPT-6 Luna
Common questions
GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6 Luna
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is GPT-5.6 Luna or GPT-6 Luna cheaper for input?
Is GPT-5.6 Luna or GPT-6 Luna cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.6 Luna or GPT-6 Luna?
Do GPT-5.6 Luna and GPT-6 Luna support the same reasoning levels?
Should I use GPT-5.6 Luna or GPT-6 Luna?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 per 1M tokens versus $0.20 for GPT-5.6 Luna — a 2x difference at the headline tier.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.