Skip to main content
AI Choice EngineAI Choice Engine

Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Sol vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra

OpenAI against NVIDIA, compared on context, price, and verified benchmark results.

Catalog record checked September 3, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: High — see receipts below

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol

Frontier

vs

NVIDIA

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra

Frontier · Open weights

AI model capability comparison
SpecificationGPT-5.6 SolNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
ProviderOpenAINVIDIA
TierFrontierFrontier
Context windowWinner: 1.05M1M
Max output128KNot verifiedUnverified
Input / 1M tokens$4Winner: $0.50
Output / 1M tokens$20Winner: $2.20
WeightsClosedOpen
Parametersflagship reasoning + coding model550B total / 55B active (MoE)
Reasoning levelsnone, low, medium, high, xhigh, maxlow, high, max
Modalitiestext, imagetext
API model idgpt-5.6-solnemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b
ReleasedJuly 9, 2026June 4, 2026
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] (2026-08-14)61Not verifiedUnverified
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-08-14)Not verifiedUnverified54
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (2026-07-09)88.8Not verifiedUnverified
GPQA Diamond (2026-07-09)94.6Not verifiedUnverified

Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.

Benchmark receipts

  • 2026-08-14: Artificial AnalysisComposite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score. Comparability: directly comparable — AA occasionally rebaselines the index scale between snapshots — a score captured on one date is only comparable to same-snapshot scores (check measuredAt).
  • 2026-07-09: OpenAI — GPT-5.6 evals table (vendor)Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment. Comparability: comparable with caveat — Scores across Terminal-Bench major versions (v1 vs v2) are NOT comparable; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.

Pricing tiers: GPT-5.6 Sol: Launch list was $5/$30; cut to $4/$20 on 2026-08-21, promo held at least through 2026-11-21. Cached input $0.40/MTok; batch $2/$10. Knowledge cutoff Feb 16 2026. · NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra: Open weights (weights + data + recipes); $0.50/$2.20 per MTok is the third-party hosted rate (OpenRouter). 550B/55B MoE.

FrontierRecord checked September 3, 2026

GPT-5.6 Sol

OpenAI's GPT-5.6 flagship for complex reasoning and coding with a 1.05M-token context — top-tier but no longer the agentic-coding leader on the tracked boards.

Best for

  • Complex reasoning
  • Agentic coding
  • Hard knowledge work

Watch out

At $4/$20 per MTok it is the priciest GPT-5.6 tier; 'max' effort and 'ultra' multi-agent mode multiply token use.

FrontierOpen weightsRecord checked September 2, 2026

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra

Nemotron 3 Ultra is NVIDIA's open-weight (550B/55B) frontier MoE with a 1M-token context.

Best for

  • Open-weight frontier
  • Self-hosting on NVIDIA GPUs
  • Reasoning

Watch out

Top US open-weight until Thinking Machines Inkling; verify hosted pricing.

When the cheaper one wins

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is cheaper on output at $2.20 per million tokens against $20 for GPT-5.6 Sol — about 9.1×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.

Run the model picker

Evidence confidence: High

How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.

  • Pricing verified on both sidesInput and output rates are verified for both models.
  • 4/5 core specs verified on both sidesNot published for at least one side: max output.
  • 1 shared named benchmark with differing scoresMeasured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
  • Verified within the last 90 daysNewest catalog check was 8 days ago.
  • Both models carry source citationsEach side has at least two catalog sources on record.

Source receipts

Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.

Common questions

GPT-5.6 Sol vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra

Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.

Is GPT-5.6 Sol or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra cheaper for input?

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is cheaper at $0.50 per million input tokens, against $4 for GPT-5.6 Sol — roughly 8.0× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; GPT-5.6 Sol has tiered pricing: Launch list was $5/$30; cut to $4/$20 on 2026-08-21, promo held at least through 2026-11-21. Cached input $0.40/MTok; batch $2/$10. Knowledge cutoff Feb 16 2026. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra has tiered pricing: Open weights (weights + data + recipes); $0.50/$2.20 per MTok is the third-party hosted rate (OpenRouter). 550B/55B MoE.

Is GPT-5.6 Sol or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra cheaper for output?

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is cheaper at $2.20 per million output tokens, against $20 for GPT-5.6 Sol — roughly 9.1× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; GPT-5.6 Sol has tiered pricing: Launch list was $5/$30; cut to $4/$20 on 2026-08-21, promo held at least through 2026-11-21. Cached input $0.40/MTok; batch $2/$10. Knowledge cutoff Feb 16 2026. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra has tiered pricing: Open weights (weights + data + recipes); $0.50/$2.20 per MTok is the third-party hosted rate (OpenRouter). 550B/55B MoE.

Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.6 Sol or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra?

GPT-5.6 Sol accepts 1.05M tokens against 1M for NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra. This only matters if you routinely send very long documents or large codebases.

Do GPT-5.6 Sol and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra support the same reasoning levels?

GPT-5.6 Sol exposes none, low, medium, high, xhigh, max, while NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra exposes low, high, max.

Should I use GPT-5.6 Sol or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Both sit in the frontier tier, so the choice usually comes down to price and context rather than capability. GPT-5.6 Sol suits complex reasoning; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra suits open-weight frontier.

Can I self-host GPT-5.6 Sol or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra?

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra publishes open weights, but self-hosting and third-party provider access depend on the licence, hardware, serving support, and availability. GPT-5.6 Sol is a closed model whose supported access paths are controlled by its provider.

Next step

Choosing between them

The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.

  • Input price: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.50 per 1M tokens versus $4 for GPT-5.6 Sol — a 8x difference at the headline tier.
  • Context: GPT-5.6 Sol takes 1.05M against 1M for NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
  • Measured capability: GPT-5.6 Sol leads Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 61 to 54 (measured 2026-08-14).
  • Deployment: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra publishes weights you can self-host; the other is API-only.

Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.