Model comparison
GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen 3.8 Max
OpenAI against Qwen, compared on context, price, and attributed benchmark results.
Recorded profile verification October 2, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Medium — see receipts below
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol
Frontier
Qwen
Qwen 3.8 Max
Frontier
| Specification | GPT-5.6 Sol | Qwen 3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Frontier | Frontier |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | Winner: 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | 128K | Winner: 131K |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | $4 | Winner: $2 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | $20 | Winner: $6 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | Not verifiedUnverified | 2.4T total (MoE; managed active count not verified) |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | none, low, medium, high, xhigh, max | low, medium, xhigh |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image | text, image, video |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | gpt-5.6-sol | qwen3.8-max |
| Released | ||
| Released | July 9, 2026 | August 3, 2026 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date GPT-5.6 Sol: 2026-07-09 | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date GPT-5.6 Sol: 2026-07-09 | 88.8 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Qwen 3.8 Max: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Qwen 3.8 Max: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 86.6 |
| GPQA Diamond · source date GPT-5.6 Sol: 2026-07-09 | ||
| GPQA Diamond · source date GPT-5.6 Sol: 2026-07-09 | 94.6 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| GPQA Diamond · source date Qwen 3.8 Max: 2026-10-01 | ||
| GPQA Diamond · source date Qwen 3.8 Max: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 92.6 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · source date Qwen 3.8 Max: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · source date Qwen 3.8 Max: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 45 |
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date Qwen 3.8 Max: 2026-08-14 | ||
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date Qwen 3.8 Max: 2026-08-14 | Not verifiedUnverified | 56.2 |
Dates beside benchmark scores refer to the linked source’s publication or capture date unless that source explicitly states when it measured the result. A shared URL alone does not establish comparable runs; unverified setups are marked. Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- Source date2026-10-01Qwen official checkpoint card reproducing the managed Max evaluation table (vendor) (Managed Qwen3.8-Max column; complete run configuration unverified)
Graduate-level science reasoning: multiple-choice questions written by domain PhDs.
Comparable with caveatDo not treat a fixed two-point band as universal measurement uncertainty; it depends on run count and evaluation setup. Chain-of-thought, prompt, and tool policy must match. The small pool limits fine-grained conclusions, and frontier scores can be near ceiling; Artificial Analysis dropped it from its Intelligence Index in v4.3.
- Source date2026-10-01Qwen official checkpoint card reproducing the managed Max evaluation table (vendor) (Managed Qwen3.8-Max column; Claude Code avg@10, 5-hour timeout, max_tokens 131,072; exact run date unverified)
Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatNot comparable with Terminal-Bench 3.0 or 4.0 (different task sets) or v1; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
- Source date2026-10-01Artificial Analysis (Qwen3.8 Max (0902))
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check the cited source and its date.
- Source date2026-08-14Z.ai GLM-5.3 vendor evaluation of Qwen3.8-Max, with tools; distinct from Qwen no-tools results
Frontier-knowledge ceiling: extremely hard multi-domain questions written to be near-impossible without deep expertise.
Comparable with caveatSubset/tool configurations (text-only vs with-tools) differ between vendors and materially change scores; must match configuration to compare.
- Source date2026-07-09OpenAI — GPT-5.6 evals table (vendor)
Graduate-level science reasoning: multiple-choice questions written by domain PhDs.
Comparable with caveatDo not treat a fixed two-point band as universal measurement uncertainty; it depends on run count and evaluation setup. Chain-of-thought, prompt, and tool policy must match. The small pool limits fine-grained conclusions, and frontier scores can be near ceiling; Artificial Analysis dropped it from its Intelligence Index in v4.3.
- Source date2026-07-09OpenAI — GPT-5.6 evals table (vendor; Ultra multi-agent config: 91.9)
Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatNot comparable with Terminal-Bench 3.0 or 4.0 (different task sets) or v1; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
Pricing tiers
GPT-5.6 Sol: Launch $5/$30, reduced to promotional $4/$20 on August 21; available at least through November 21, 2026. Above 272K input the full request bills $8/$30. Cached input $0.40/$0.80 short/long and cache writes $5/$10. Batch is $2/$10 at short context. Regional/FedRAMP processing adds 10% where eligible. Knowledge cutoff Feb 16 2026.
Qwen 3.8 Max: Model Studio International $2/$6 per MTok; implicit cache $0.25, explicit creation $2.50/read $0.17. China/Global $1.65/$4.951, cache $0.206, creation $2.063/read $0.137. Output 131,072 in both modes; input 991,808 non-thinking or 983,616 thinking, 1M context and 262,144 reasoning. Batch supported in China, unavailable in International/Global.
GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Sol was OpenAI's GPT-5.6 flagship for complex reasoning and coding with a 1.05M-token context — superseded on 2026-09-22 by GPT-6 Sol at half the price.
Best for
- Complex reasoning
- Agentic coding
- Hard knowledge work
Watch out
GPT-6.1 Sol is the newer Sol option at $2/$10 Standard. GPT-5.6 Sol remains listed; its $4/$20 price is promotional. Max effort can increase token use, and Ultra is a multi-agent configuration rather than a separate reasoning.effort value.
Qwen 3.8 Max
Qwen 3.8 Max is Alibaba's managed multimodal flagship, with a vendor-described 2.4T MoE scale and 1M context.
Best for
- Hosted agentic work
- Long-context
- Multimodal
Watch out
The text-only open checkpoint has 262,144 native context with extension and requires thinking; its 95B active count is not verified for the managed API. Managed Max accepts visual input and supports thinking on/off, xhigh default and low/medium/xhigh controls, with preserved thinking by default. API reasoning_effort and thinking_budget cannot both be set. Regional web-search and Batch support differ. Independent AA 0902 results identify a snapshot, not every alias version.
When the cheaper one wins
Qwen 3.8 Max is cheaper on output at $6 per million tokens against $20 for GPT-5.6 Sol — about 3.3×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. On DeepSWE 1.1, Qwen 3.8 Max is 57.5% Pass@1 at $3.73/task versus GPT-5.6 Sol at 72.7% / $8.39/task. This compares standard short-context token rates, not total cost per accepted task. Include input, cache, context tiers, schedules, retries and review in your pilot.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: Medium
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 4/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: parameter count.
- No directly aligned benchmark setup — No benchmark has matching cited sources, source dates, units, effort and recorded run details on both models.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Older of the two catalog checks was 25 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- GPT-5.6 Sol: OpenAI model card — whole-profile source check October 1 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- GPT-5.6 Sol: OpenAI current API pricing and processing tiers (accessed 2026-10-01)
- GPT-5.6 Sol: OpenAI — GPT-5.6 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- GPT-5.6 Sol: OpenAI API pricing (gpt-5.6-sol $4/$20) (accessed 2026-08-29)
- GPT-5.6 Sol: OpenAI — Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna (GPT-5.6 Sol successor) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Qwen 3.8 Max: Dedicated exact capacities and regional pricing (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Qwen 3.8 Max: Exact effort and compatibility rules (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Qwen 3.8 Max: Current managed card and exact cache rates (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Qwen 3.8 Max: Current hosted thinking versus checkpoint mode (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Qwen 3.8 Max: Qwen — Qwen 3.8 Max (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Qwen 3.8 Max: Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Qwen 3.8 Max: Alibaba Cloud Model Studio — text generation models (1M ctx, 131,072 out) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Qwen 3.8 Max: Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B checkpoint card (distinguishes enhanced managed Max) (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Qwen 3.8 Max: QwenCloud managed Qwen3.8-Max model card (cache and mode-specific limits) (accessed 2026-10-01)
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen 3.8 Max
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol
- Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Qwen 3.8 Max
Diving deeper on one model? GPT-5.6 Sol · Qwen 3.8 Max
Common questions
GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen 3.8 Max
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is GPT-5.6 Sol or Qwen 3.8 Max cheaper for input?
Is GPT-5.6 Sol or Qwen 3.8 Max cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.6 Sol or Qwen 3.8 Max?
Do GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen 3.8 Max support the same reasoning levels?
Should I use GPT-5.6 Sol or Qwen 3.8 Max?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: Qwen 3.8 Max costs $2 per 1M tokens versus $4 for GPT-5.6 Sol — a 2x difference at the headline tier.
- Context: GPT-5.6 Sol takes 1.05M against 1M for Qwen 3.8 Max — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.