Model comparison
GPT-6 Astra vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
OpenAI against Xiaomi, compared on context, price, and verified benchmark results.
Catalog record checked September 5, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: High — see receipts below
OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra
Frontier
Xiaomi
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Frontier · Open weights
| Specification | GPT-6 Astra | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Xiaomi |
| Tier | Frontier | Frontier |
| Context window | Winner: 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Input / 1M tokens | $10 | Winner: $1 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $50 | Winner: $3 |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Parameters | computer-use flagship | 1.02T total / 42B active (MoE) |
| Reasoning levels | low, medium, high, xhigh, max | low, high, max |
| Modalities | text, image | text, image |
| License | Not disclosedUnverified | MIT |
| API model id | gpt-6-astra | mimo-v2-5-pro |
| Released | September 3, 2026 | April 22, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] (2026-09-03) | 61.2 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-08-14) | Not verifiedUnverified | 52 |
| DeepSWE 1.1 (2026-09-03) | 74.1 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| OSWorld 2.0 (offline) (2026-09-03) | 72.6 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| GPQA Diamond (2026-09-03) | 96 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Humanity's Last Exam (2026-09-03) | 57.2 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (2026-09-05) | 89.9 | Not verifiedUnverified |
Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
- 2026-09-05: Artificial Analysis Terminal-Bench v2.1 (independent, Terminus 2 harness — conflicts with tbench.ai 87.4; harness difference preserved)Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment. Comparability: comparable with caveat — Scores across Terminal-Bench major versions (v1 vs v2) are NOT comparable; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
- 2026-09-03: Terminal-Bench official leaderboard (independent, native harness, high effort; captured 2026-09-03 — the live board has since moved to Terminal-Bench 4.0)Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment. Comparability: comparable with caveat — Scores across Terminal-Bench major versions (v1 vs v2) are NOT comparable; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
- 2026-09-03: OpenAI GPT-6 Astra launch chart (vendor, with tools; transcribed by Vellum)Agentic software engineering: pass@1 on real repo tasks with reported cost per completed task. Comparability: directly comparable
- 2026-08-14: Artificial AnalysisComposite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score. Comparability: directly comparable — AA occasionally rebaselines the index scale between snapshots — a score captured on one date is only comparable to same-snapshot scores (check measuredAt).
Pricing tiers: GPT-6 Astra: Standard $10/$50 per MTok (≤272K context); >272K input billed $20/$75 (Fast mode output $100). Cached input $1/MTok; Fast mode is 2x price for ~2.5x speed. Knowledge cutoff Apr 30 2026. Rolling out over several days from 2026-09-03; Enterprise tenants get it disabled by default. · Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro: $1.00/$3.00 per MTok up to 256K prompt; $2.00/$6.00 above 256K (to 1M). Open weights (MIT). 1.02T/42B active MoE, native multimodal.
GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra is OpenAI's computer-use flagship — the first model it gates at the Preparedness Framework's 'Critical' cybersecurity threshold, trained on >100,000 GPUs at Stargate.
Best for
- Computer-use agents
- Agentic coding
- Hard reasoning
Watch out
Gated at the 'Critical' cyber threshold and disabled by default for Enterprise; long-context work bills $20/$75 above 272K input tokens.
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is Xiaomi's open-weight (MIT) 1.02T MoE with native multimodal and a 1M context.
Best for
- Open-weight frontier
- Multimodal
- Long-context
Watch out
Verify weights/pricing on your endpoint.
When the cheaper one wins
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper on output at $3 per million tokens against $50 for GPT-6 Astra — about 17×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: High
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 4/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: max output.
- 1 shared named benchmark with differing scores — Measured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Newest catalog check was 6 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- GPT-6 Astra: OpenAI — Introducing GPT-6 Astra (accessed 2026-09-03)
- GPT-6 Astra: OpenAI API pricing (gpt-6-astra $10/$50) (accessed 2026-09-03)
- GPT-6 Astra: CNBC — OpenAI launches GPT-6 Astra (accessed 2026-09-03)
- GPT-6 Astra: OpenAI model docs — gpt-6-astra (128K max output, effort levels) (accessed 2026-09-05)
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Xiaomi — MiMo V2.5 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Xiaomi MiMo (accessed 2026-08-29)
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Fable 5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Diving deeper on one model? GPT-6 Astra · Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Common questions
GPT-6 Astra vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is GPT-6 Astra or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro cheaper for input?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $1 per million input tokens, against $10 for GPT-6 Astra — roughly 10× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; GPT-6 Astra has tiered pricing: Standard $10/$50 per MTok (≤272K context); >272K input billed $20/$75 (Fast mode output $100). Cached input $1/MTok; Fast mode is 2x price for ~2.5x speed. Knowledge cutoff Apr 30 2026. Rolling out over several days from 2026-09-03; Enterprise tenants get it disabled by default. Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has tiered pricing: $1.00/$3.00 per MTok up to 256K prompt; $2.00/$6.00 above 256K (to 1M). Open weights (MIT). 1.02T/42B active MoE, native multimodal.
Is GPT-6 Astra or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro cheaper for output?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $3 per million output tokens, against $50 for GPT-6 Astra — roughly 17× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; GPT-6 Astra has tiered pricing: Standard $10/$50 per MTok (≤272K context); >272K input billed $20/$75 (Fast mode output $100). Cached input $1/MTok; Fast mode is 2x price for ~2.5x speed. Knowledge cutoff Apr 30 2026. Rolling out over several days from 2026-09-03; Enterprise tenants get it disabled by default. Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro has tiered pricing: $1.00/$3.00 per MTok up to 256K prompt; $2.00/$6.00 above 256K (to 1M). Open weights (MIT). 1.02T/42B active MoE, native multimodal.
Which has the larger context window, GPT-6 Astra or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
GPT-6 Astra accepts 1.05M tokens against 1M for Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro. This only matters if you routinely send very long documents or large codebases.
Do GPT-6 Astra and Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro support the same reasoning levels?
GPT-6 Astra exposes low, medium, high, xhigh, max, while Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro exposes low, high, max.
Should I use GPT-6 Astra or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Both sit in the frontier tier, so the choice usually comes down to price and context rather than capability. GPT-6 Astra suits computer-use agents; Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro suits open-weight frontier.
Can I self-host GPT-6 Astra or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro publishes open weights, but self-hosting and third-party provider access depend on the licence, hardware, serving support, and availability. GPT-6 Astra is a closed model whose supported access paths are controlled by its provider.
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $1 per 1M tokens versus $10 for GPT-6 Astra — a 10x difference at the headline tier.
- Context: GPT-6 Astra takes 1.05M against 1M for Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
- Measured capability: GPT-6 Astra leads Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 61.2 to 52 (measured 2026-09-03).
- Deployment: Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro publishes weights you can self-host; the other is API-only.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.