Model comparison
Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 vs Qwen 3.7 Max
Microsoft against Qwen, compared on context, price, and verified benchmark results.
Catalog record checked September 5, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: High — see receipts below
Microsoft
Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1
Frontier
Qwen
Qwen 3.7 Max
Frontier
| Specification | Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 | Qwen 3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Qwen |
| Tier | Frontier | Frontier |
| Context window | 256K | Winner: 1M |
| Max output | 64K | Winner: 128K |
| Input / 1M tokens | Winner: $2 | $2.50 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $8 | Winner: $7.50 |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Parameters | ~1T total / 35B active (sparse MoE) | proprietary MoE |
| Reasoning levels | low, medium, high | low, high, max |
| Modalities | text | text, image, video |
| API model id | mai-thinking-1 | qwen3.7-max |
| Released | June 2, 2026 | May 20, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-08-14) | 55 | 55 |
| AIME 2025 (2026-08-12) | 97 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| SWE-bench Verified (2026-06) | 73.5 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| GPQA Diamond (2026-06) | 84.2 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 (2026-06) | 46 | Not verifiedUnverified |
Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
- 2026-08-14: Artificial AnalysisComposite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score. Comparability: directly comparable — AA occasionally rebaselines the index scale between snapshots — a score captured on one date is only comparable to same-snapshot scores (check measuredAt).
- 2026-08-12: Microsoft AI — Introducing MAI-Thinking-1 (vendor, 256k output)Competition mathematics: AIME 2025 exam problems, typically pass@1 with tools disallowed or single-attempt code execution per the harness. Comparability: comparable with caveat — 30-question total denominator: one problem = ~3.3 points. Tool-use policy (calculator/code interpreter) must match between compared models.
- 2026-06: Microsoft AI model page (vendor, as labeled: Terminal-Bench 2.0 — NOT comparable to 2.1 observations)Real GitHub issue resolution: does the model's patch pass the hidden tests. Comparability: comparable with caveat — Post-audit vendor claims and pre-audit scores sit on different task trust levels; scaffolding (agent harness, compute budget) also dominates results. Never aggregate across scaffolds.
Pricing tiers: Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1: Global Standard $2.00/$8.00 per MTok, cached input $0.20 (Azure Retail Prices API, effective 2026-08-01, uniform across ~22 public regions; US Gov regions carry premiums). Still preview; Global Standard only, no PTU yet. 256K context with a 64K output cap that includes reasoning tokens. ~1T/35B sparse MoE; reasoning is always on (no effort levels). Microsoft's first true reasoning model, trained without OpenAI distillation. · Qwen 3.7 Max: Model Studio list $2.50/$7.50 per MTok; a 50%-off promo ($1.25/$3.75) ran at launch. Closed API.
Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1
MAI-Thinking-1 is Microsoft's first in-house reasoning model, reducing dependence on OpenAI.
Best for
- Enterprise (Azure)
- Reasoning
- Microsoft ecosystem
Watch out
Foundry-gated preview; no MAI-2 exists yet. Of the Build 2026 MAI wave, only MAI-Thinking-1 and MAI-Cyber-1-Flash ($0.60/$3.50, released 2026-07-27) have published token meters.
Qwen 3.7 Max
Qwen 3.7 Max is Alibaba's previous-generation proprietary flagship with a 1M-token context.
Best for
- API-only multimodal
- Long-context
- Enterprise
Watch out
Closed/proprietary; no published weights. Succeeded by Qwen 3.8 Max.
When the cheaper one wins
Qwen 3.7 Max is cheaper on output at $7.50 per million tokens against $8 for Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 — about 1.1×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: High
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 5/5 core specs verified on both sides — All core specifications verified for both models.
- 1 shared named benchmark (scores match) — Measured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index — scores are equivalent, so the benchmark does not separate the pair.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Newest catalog check was 6 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1: Azure Retail Prices API (MAI-Thinking-1 $2/$0.20 cached/$8) (accessed 2026-09-04)
- Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1: AzureSpeed — AI model pricing tracker (same figures) (accessed 2026-09-04)
- Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1: Microsoft — Introducing MAI-Thinking-1 (~1T total / 35B active MoE) (accessed 2026-09-05)
- Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1: Microsoft Foundry — MAI-Thinking-1 usage (256K context, 64K output cap) (accessed 2026-09-05)
- Qwen 3.7 Max: Alibaba Cloud — Qwen3.7: The Agent Frontier (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Qwen 3.7 Max: Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (accessed 2026-08-29)
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen 3.7 Max
- Claude Fable 5 vs Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1
- Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.7 Max
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Qwen 3.7 Max
Diving deeper on one model? Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 · Qwen 3.7 Max
Common questions
Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 vs Qwen 3.7 Max
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen 3.7 Max cheaper for input?
Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 is cheaper at $2 per million input tokens, against $2.50 for Qwen 3.7 Max — roughly 1.3× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 has tiered pricing: Global Standard $2.00/$8.00 per MTok, cached input $0.20 (Azure Retail Prices API, effective 2026-08-01, uniform across ~22 public regions; US Gov regions carry premiums). Still preview; Global Standard only, no PTU yet. 256K context with a 64K output cap that includes reasoning tokens. ~1T/35B sparse MoE; reasoning is always on (no effort levels). Microsoft's first true reasoning model, trained without OpenAI distillation. Qwen 3.7 Max has tiered pricing: Model Studio list $2.50/$7.50 per MTok; a 50%-off promo ($1.25/$3.75) ran at launch. Closed API.
Is Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen 3.7 Max cheaper for output?
Qwen 3.7 Max is cheaper at $7.50 per million output tokens, against $8 for Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 — roughly 1.1× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 has tiered pricing: Global Standard $2.00/$8.00 per MTok, cached input $0.20 (Azure Retail Prices API, effective 2026-08-01, uniform across ~22 public regions; US Gov regions carry premiums). Still preview; Global Standard only, no PTU yet. 256K context with a 64K output cap that includes reasoning tokens. ~1T/35B sparse MoE; reasoning is always on (no effort levels). Microsoft's first true reasoning model, trained without OpenAI distillation. Qwen 3.7 Max has tiered pricing: Model Studio list $2.50/$7.50 per MTok; a 50%-off promo ($1.25/$3.75) ran at launch. Closed API.
Which has the larger context window, Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen 3.7 Max?
Qwen 3.7 Max accepts 1M tokens against 256K for Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1. This only matters if you routinely send very long documents or large codebases.
Do Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 and Qwen 3.7 Max support the same reasoning levels?
Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 exposes low, medium, high, while Qwen 3.7 Max exposes low, high, max.
Should I use Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen 3.7 Max?
Both sit in the frontier tier, so the choice usually comes down to price and context rather than capability. Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 suits enterprise (azure); Qwen 3.7 Max suits api-only multimodal.
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 costs $2 per 1M tokens versus $2.50 for Qwen 3.7 Max — a 1.3x difference at the headline tier.
- Context: Qwen 3.7 Max takes 1M against 256K for Microsoft MAI-Thinking-1 — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.