Skip to main content
AI Choice Engine

Model comparison

Qwen 3.7 Max vs Qwen 3.8 27B

Two Qwen tiers compared on the figures that decide which one a workload actually needs.

Catalog record checked September 26, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: High — see receipts below

Qwen

Qwen 3.7 Max

Frontier

vs

Qwen

Qwen 3.8 27B

Budget · Open weights

AI model capability comparison
SpecificationQwen 3.7 MaxQwen 3.8 27B
ProviderQwenQwen
TierFrontierBudget
Context windowWinner: 1M262K
Max output128KNot verifiedUnverified
Input / 1M tokens$2.50Winner: $0.50
Output / 1M tokens$7.50Winner: $3
WeightsClosedOpen
Parametersproprietary MoE27B dense VLM (Gated DeltaNet hybrid)
Reasoning levelslow, high, maxlow, medium, xhigh
Modalitiestext, image, videotext, image, video
LicenseNot disclosedUnverifiedApache 2.0
API model idqwen3.7-maxqwen3.8-27b
ReleasedMay 20, 2026August 13, 2026
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-09-26)29.5Not verifiedUnverified
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [xhigh] (2026-09-26)Not verifiedUnverified33.7

Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.

Benchmark receipts

Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.

  • 2026-09-26
    Artificial Analysis

    Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.

    Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check measuredAt.

Pricing tiers

Qwen 3.7 Max: Model Studio list $2.50/$7.50 per MTok; a 50%-off promo ($1.25/$3.75) ran at launch. Closed API.

Qwen 3.8 27B: Hosted qwen3.8-27b lists $0.50/$3.00 per MTok on Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (API launched 2026-08-19). Open weights (Apache 2.0) for self-hosting.

FrontierRecord checked September 26, 2026

Qwen 3.7 Max

Qwen 3.7 Max is Alibaba's previous-generation proprietary flagship with a 1M-token context.

Best for

  • API-only multimodal
  • Long-context
  • Enterprise

Watch out

Model Studio now lists it under legacy models ('no longer recommended'); succeeded by Qwen 3.8 Max. Closed weights.

BudgetOpen weightsRecord checked September 26, 2026

Qwen 3.8 27B

Qwen 3.8 27B is Alibaba's compact deployment-friendly dense VLM — 262K native context (1M via YaRN), Apache 2.0 weights, distinct from the hosted Qwen 3.8 Max API.

Best for

  • Self-hosting on a single node
  • Multimodal input at small scale
  • Long-context on modest hardware

Watch out

Dense 27B means higher memory per token than an MoE of equal active size; video input is multimodal-input only.

When the cheaper one wins

Qwen 3.8 27B is cheaper on output at $3 per million tokens against $7.50 for Qwen 3.7 Max — about 2.5×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.

Run the model picker

Evidence confidence: High

How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.

  • Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
  • 4/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: max output.
  • 1 shared named benchmark with differing scores — Measured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
  • Verified within the last 90 days — Newest catalog check was 2 days ago.
  • Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.

Source receipts

Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.

Related comparisons

Diving deeper on one model? Qwen 3.7 Max · Qwen 3.8 27B

Common questions

Qwen 3.7 Max vs Qwen 3.8 27B

Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.

Is Qwen 3.7 Max or Qwen 3.8 27B cheaper for input?
Qwen 3.8 27B is cheaper at $0.50 per million input tokens, against $2.50 for Qwen 3.7 Max — roughly 5.0× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; Qwen 3.7 Max has tiered pricing: Model Studio list $2.50/$7.50 per MTok; a 50%-off promo ($1.25/$3.75) ran at launch. Closed API. Qwen 3.8 27B has tiered pricing: Hosted qwen3.8-27b lists $0.50/$3.00 per MTok on Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (API launched 2026-08-19). Open weights (Apache 2.0) for self-hosting.
Is Qwen 3.7 Max or Qwen 3.8 27B cheaper for output?
Qwen 3.8 27B is cheaper at $3 per million output tokens, against $7.50 for Qwen 3.7 Max — roughly 2.5× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; Qwen 3.7 Max has tiered pricing: Model Studio list $2.50/$7.50 per MTok; a 50%-off promo ($1.25/$3.75) ran at launch. Closed API. Qwen 3.8 27B has tiered pricing: Hosted qwen3.8-27b lists $0.50/$3.00 per MTok on Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (API launched 2026-08-19). Open weights (Apache 2.0) for self-hosting.
Which has the larger context window, Qwen 3.7 Max or Qwen 3.8 27B?
Qwen 3.7 Max accepts 1M tokens against 262K for Qwen 3.8 27B. This only matters if you routinely send very long documents or large codebases.
Do Qwen 3.7 Max and Qwen 3.8 27B support the same reasoning levels?
Qwen 3.7 Max exposes low, high, max, while Qwen 3.8 27B exposes low, medium, xhigh.
Should I use Qwen 3.7 Max or Qwen 3.8 27B?
Qwen 3.7 Max is the frontier tier and Qwen 3.8 27B the budget tier. The useful question is whether your hardest task actually fails on the cheaper one — most production volume such as classification, extraction and summarisation does not.
Can I self-host Qwen 3.7 Max or Qwen 3.8 27B?
Qwen 3.8 27B publishes open weights, but self-hosting and third-party provider access depend on the licence, hardware, serving support, and availability. Qwen 3.7 Max is a closed model whose supported access paths are controlled by its provider.

Next step

Choosing between them

The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.

  • Input price: Qwen 3.8 27B costs $0.50 per 1M tokens versus $2.50 for Qwen 3.7 Max — a 5x difference at the headline tier.
  • Context: Qwen 3.7 Max takes 1M against 262K for Qwen 3.8 27B — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
  • Measured capability: Qwen 3.8 27B leads Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 33.7 to 29.5 (measured 2026-09-26).
  • Deployment: Qwen 3.8 27B publishes weights you can self-host; the other is API-only.
  • Positioning: Qwen 3.7 Max sits in the frontier tier, Qwen 3.8 27B in the budget tier — most production volume (classification, extraction, summarisation) does not need the pricier tier.
Run the model pickerEstimate stack costAll model comparisons

Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.