Agentic harness comparison
Amp vs Cursor
Compared on where each one runs, which editors it supports, how autonomous it is, and how it bills — the four things that actually decide Amp vs Cursor. Rankings reflect fit and trade-offs, not a single universal winner; partner links, when present, do not replace that methodology.
Details last verified October 2, 2026
Amp
Amp
Terminal + web + beta macOS/iOS apps · Agentic
Cursor
Cursor
IDE, standalone CLI and cloud agents · Hybrid
| Specification | Amp | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ||
| Vendor | Amp | Cursor |
| Runs in | ||
| Runs in | Terminal + web + beta macOS/iOS apps | IDE, standalone CLI and cloud agents |
| Editor support | ||
| Editor support | Any terminal, Web Orbs, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Zed, Neovim | Cursor IDE (VS Code fork), Terminal CLI beside any editor, Cloud agents (web/mobile) |
| Autonomy | ||
| Autonomy | Agentic | Hybrid |
| Pricing model | ||
| Pricing model | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Requires changing editor | ||
| Requires changing editor | No | No |
| Publisher-reported SWE-bench Verified (Background Agent, Claude Sonnet 4.6) · source date 2026-04-19 | ||
| Publisher-reported SWE-bench Verified (Background Agent, Claude Sonnet 4.6) · source date 2026-04-19 | Not verifiedUnverified | 65.7% |
Dates refer to the linked source’s publication or capture unless it explicitly states when the benchmark was measured. Values we could not confirm are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
- Cursor · Publisher-reported SWE-bench Verified (Background Agent, Claude Sonnet 4.6): source
Amp
Amp Frontier Corporation's coding agent runs locally in its CLI, in cloud Orbs, or on connected runners, with web and beta macOS/iOS apps sharing threads.
Best for
- Terminal and cloud agent workflows
- Teams reviewing model routing and permissions
- Cross-device threads with explicit visibility controls
Watch out
Hobby is free client access/BYOK or linked subscriptions with paid Orbs; Individual Megawatt is $20/month with 45,000 weighted Orb minutes; Teams adds no extra charge and Enterprise is custom. Gigawatt price and exact included agent allowance are not established by these public pages. Education is $10/month for eligible students/teachers; the captured page does not confirm an extra $10 credit grant. Non-enterprise paid-credit inference has no provider API markup; non-model tools can also charge credits, purchased credits expire after 12 months, and included usage does not roll over. Orbs bill by minute: a1 sizes $0.08–$2.13/hour, largest restricted, and pause after both 5 minutes without agent work and 20 minutes without interaction; idle services do not themselves keep an Orb awake. Mode routing can be pinned: ChatGPT linking alone does not convert every role, and ultra keeps Amp routing. Tools require no approval by default; custom policy plugins are the current control, not an assumed legacy permission mode. Workspace-project threads default shared; personal/no-project threads private, subject to admin controls. Amp-managed inference MDR has safety/legal/model exceptions, sometimes up to 30 days, and does not cover thread storage. Training is off absent explicit opt-in; Enterprise cannot enable it. BYOK/consumer-subscription terms are separate, and Fable BYOK requires retained-data workspace access. CLI docs say Windows via WSL while a native PowerShell installer exists; confirm installed-client support. Sources: https://ampcode.com/docs/pricing; https://ampcode.com/docs/the-dial; https://ampcode.com/docs/tools; https://ampcode.com/docs/orbs/sizes-and-costs; https://ampcode.com/security.
Cursor
Cursor, now part of SpaceX, offers an AI-native VS Code-based editor, a standalone terminal agent and cloud agents. The IDE path changes editor; the CLI can run beside an existing editor. Grok and Composer are first-party models, with third-party models available subject to plan and policy.
Best for
- Daily feature work
- Multi-file edits in-editor
- Teams already on VS Code
Watch out
SpaceX-owned Cursor currently prices Hobby free, Pro $20/month, Pro+ $60, Ultra $200, Teams Standard $40/user/month and Premium $120 (5x Standard Agent limits). India-only Start is ₹649/month including tax, restricted to Cursor Models and without the Other Models pool or on-demand usage. Individual plans have separate monthly Cursor Models and Other Models pools; third-party models are charged at API rates. Teams/Enterprise add $0.25/MTok on third-party direct, Auto and BYOK usage, not first-party models. Eligible US-only residency adds a 10% model-price uplift. Old $20/$70/$400 included-dollar figures are not currently established (https://cursor.com/pricing; https://cursor.com/docs/models-and-pricing). OpenAI's August 28 notice proposes a November 12, 2026 (2026-11-12) wind-down; it does not prove OpenAI models have already been removed (https://openai.com/index/our-decision-on-cursor-following-its-acquisition-by-spacex/). Privacy Mode prevents training, subject to abuse-investigation retention and explicitly approved non-ZDR models such as Fable; BYOK requests still use Cursor's backend. Current Instant Grep builds/searches its index locally without storing code embeddings, but opened file context can still reach model providers. Ignore rules do not block terminal or MCP reads (https://cursor.com/data-use; https://cursor.com/docs/context/codebase-indexing; https://cursor.com/docs/reference/ignore-file). The retained 65.7% benchmark is an April 19 publisher compilation for Background Agent with Sonnet 4.6, not a current-product measurement or an independently reproduced official submission. CLI/cloud availability means switching IDE is optional (https://cursor.com/docs/cli/overview; https://cursor.com/blog/joining-spacex).
Common questions
Amp vs Cursor
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Do I have to change editor to use Amp or Cursor?
How are Amp and Cursor priced?
Is Amp or Cursor better for large refactors?
Should I run Amp and Cursor together?
Will my project rules transfer between Amp and Cursor?
Is Cursor free enough for daily agent work?
Do coding agents replace code review?
Should we harden MCP before rolling out a coding agent?
Is Amp free once the CLI is installed?
Next step
Which one fits
Autonomy and editor constraints decide this far more reliably than a benchmark score.
If most of your week is small, frequent edits, an assistive workflow beats delegation and an agentic harness sits idle while billing. If you regularly hand over work spanning many files, the reverse is true.
Where one tool requires changing editor and the other does not, that difference usually outweighs any capability gap across a team — rollouts fail on adoption, not capability.
“Open vendor” links use a first-party redirect for click counting. They are not commissionable partner placements unless a programme is active for that vendor. Affiliate disclosure.