Model comparison
Base 1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
Base44 against Anthropic, compared on context, price, and attributed benchmark results.
Recorded profile verification October 2, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Insufficient data — see receipts below
Base44
Base 1
Balanced
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Balanced
| Specification | Base 1 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | Base44 | Anthropic |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | Not verifiedUnverified | 1M |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | Not verifiedUnverified | 128K |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | Not verifiedUnverified | $2 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | Not verifiedUnverified | $10 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Not verifiedUnverified | Closed |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | Not verifiedUnverified | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | Not verifiedUnverified | low, medium, high, xhigh, max |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text | text, image |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | Not verifiedUnverified | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Released | ||
| Released | Not verifiedUnverified | September 28, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 56 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 [max] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 [max] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 63.6 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 70.6 |
| CursorBench 4.0 [max] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | ||
| CursorBench 4.0 [max] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 55.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 64.5 |
| FrontierCode 1.1 (Main) [xhigh] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | ||
| FrontierCode 1.1 (Main) [xhigh] · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 52.1 |
| OSWorld 2.1 · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | ||
| OSWorld 2.1 · source date Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 80.1 |
Dates beside benchmark scores refer to the linked source’s publication or capture date unless that source explicitly states when it measured the result. A shared URL alone does not establish comparable runs; unverified setups are marked. Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- Source date2026-10-01
- Source date2026-10-01
- Source date2026-10-01Anthropic (vendor-reported) (with tools)
Frontier-knowledge ceiling: extremely hard multi-domain questions written to be near-impossible without deep expertise.
Comparable with caveatSubset/tool configurations (text-only vs with-tools) differ between vendors and materially change scores; must match configuration to compare.
- Source date2026-10-01
- Source date2026-10-01Artificial Analysis (independent, mini-swe-agent)
Agentic terminal work: long multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatDo not directly compare scores across Terminal-Bench versions: 4.0 revises and prunes the 3.0 task set and changes environment resources, requiring fresh trials. Within 4.0, harness, time limit, tools, sampling and resource settings must match; maintainer-agent and Artificial Analysis runs are not interchangeable.
- Source date2026-10-01Anthropic (vendor-reported)
Agentic terminal work: long multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatDo not directly compare scores across Terminal-Bench versions: 4.0 revises and prunes the 3.0 task set and changes environment resources, requiring fresh trials. Within 4.0, harness, time limit, tools, sampling and resource settings must match; maintainer-agent and Artificial Analysis runs are not interchangeable.
- Source date2026-10-01Artificial Analysis (Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback))
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check the cited source and its date.
Pricing tiers
Base 1: Uses Base44 message credits. Model-specific cost is shown under Credits Used per message; no direct token-rate API price is verified.
Claude Sonnet 5.5: Standard $2/$10 per MTok with no long-context surcharge; cache reads $0.20, 5-minute writes $2.50 and 1-hour writes $4. Batch $1/$5. US-only inference adds 10% where supported. The 300K output limit requires the Batch API beta header output-300k-2026-03-24; standard output stays 128K. Knowledge cutoff Jun 2026; retirement not sooner than September 28, 2027.
Base 1
Base44's first in-house model is offered in its app-building chat, with the publisher describing it as trained on platform building patterns.
Best for
- Evaluating app-building prompts within Base44
- Comparing builder output in an eligible Base44 account
Watch out
No direct inference endpoint, stable API ID, downloadable checkpoint/license, exact context/output limits, parameter count or comparable numeric benchmark is verified. The founder announcement and product changelog do not establish a reliable day-level release date in captured page metadata. The manual model-selection guide requires Builder or higher, while the changelog uses broader all-plan language; verify account access. Publisher fit claims are not independent quality results.
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic’s newer Sonnet model for everyday coding and knowledge work at the same $2/$10 token rates as Sonnet 5.
Best for
- Everyday coding
- Document and slide creation
- Fast iteration
Watch out
Vendor scores use Anthropic's evaluation setup. between_tools turns off up-front thinking only at high effort or below. Forced tool use and non-default temperature/top_p/top_k error; older computer_20251124 and some advisors are rejected. Thinking blocks are model/conversation-bound; progress text needs a display setting that returns it. Haiku 5.5 is announced, not released as of October 1.
When the cheaper one wins
One of these rows is missing a verified output price, so this page will not name a cheaper winner. Run the model picker against the actual job instead of guessing.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: Insufficient data
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better. Hard limitations apply: missing pricing; evidence too sparse.
- Pricing incomplete — No verified token pricing for Base 1.
- 0/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: context window, max output, release date, parameter count, reasoning levels.
- No directly aligned benchmark setup — No benchmark has matching cited sources, source dates, units, effort and recorded run details on both models.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Older of the two catalog checks was 25 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- Base 1: Product model access and modes (accessed 2026-10-02)
- Base 1: Publisher model announcement (accessed 2026-10-02)
- Base 1: Product rollout changelog (accessed 2026-10-02)
- Base 1: Credit billing (accessed 2026-10-02)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: Claude model overview — whole-profile source check October 1 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: Claude current API pricing, caching and inference geography (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: Anthropic release announcement (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: Claude Platform Sonnet 5.5 specifications (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: Claude models overview (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: Anthropic selectable effort levels (separate from adaptive thinking mode) (accessed 2026-10-01)
Related comparisons
- Amazon Nova 2 Lite vs Base 1
- Amazon Nova 2 Lite vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Amazon Nova 2 Pro vs Base 1
- Amazon Nova 2 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Base 1 vs Claude Sonnet 5
- Base 1 vs SWE-1.5
Diving deeper on one model? Base 1 · Claude Sonnet 5.5
Common questions
Base 1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Should I use Base 1 or Claude Sonnet 5.5?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
These two models match on every verified catalog figure — the decision comes down to provider preference, availability, and workload fit rather than published numbers.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.