Model comparison
Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiniMax M3
Anthropic against MiniMax, compared on context, price, and attributed benchmark results.
Recorded profile verification October 2, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Medium — see receipts below
Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1
Frontier
MiniMax
MiniMax M3
Frontier · Open weights
| Specification | Claude Fable 5.1 | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | Anthropic | MiniMax |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Frontier | Frontier |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | 128K | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | $10 | Winner: $0.30 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | $50 | Winner: $1.20 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | Not verifiedUnverified | 428B total / 23B active (MoE) |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | low, medium, high, xhigh, max | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image | text, image, video |
| License | ||
| License | Not verifiedUnverified | MiniMax Community License |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | claude-fable-5-1 | MiniMax-M3 |
| Released | ||
| Released | September 1, 2026 | June 1, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-10-01 | 53 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · source date MiniMax M3: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · source date MiniMax M3: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 29 |
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-09-01 | ||
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-09-01 | 65 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-09-26, MiniMax M3: 2026-06-01 (comparability not verified) | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-09-26, MiniMax M3: 2026-06-01 (comparability not verified) | 91.4 | 66 |
| DeepSWE 1.1 · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-09-03 | ||
| DeepSWE 1.1 · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-09-03 | 67.4 | Not verifiedUnverified |
Dates beside benchmark scores refer to the linked source’s publication or capture date unless that source explicitly states when it measured the result. A shared URL alone does not establish comparable runs; unverified setups are marked. Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- Source date2026-10-01Artificial Analysis (MiniMax-M3)
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check the cited source and its date.
- Source date2026-10-01Artificial Analysis (Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback))
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check the cited source and its date.
- Source date2026-09-26Artificial Analysis Terminal-Bench 2.1 (independent, Terminus 2, max effort)
Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatNot comparable with Terminal-Bench 3.0 or 4.0 (different task sets) or v1; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
- Source date2026-09-03OpenAI GPT-6 Astra launch table quoting a cross-provider result; not a direct Datacurve row (Cross-provider quotation; Fable harness, effort and experiment date unverified)
Agentic software engineering: pass@1 on real repo tasks with reported cost per completed task.
Directly comparable
- Source date2026-09-01Anthropic Fable 5.1 announcement (vendor, with tools; 60.9 no tools) — Anthropic's later Opus 5.5 table lists 65.6; conflict preserved
Frontier-knowledge ceiling: extremely hard multi-domain questions written to be near-impossible without deep expertise.
Comparable with caveatSubset/tool configurations (text-only vs with-tools) differ between vendors and materially change scores; must match configuration to compare.
- Source date2026-06-01MiniMax vendor report: Terminus2, 8CPU/16GB sandbox, 2h, 128K generation budget; budget is not an API cap
Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatNot comparable with Terminal-Bench 3.0 or 4.0 (different task sets) or v1; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
Pricing tiers
Claude Fable 5.1: Standard $10/$50 per MTok with no long-context surcharge. Cache reads $0.25, versus Fable 5's $1; 5-minute writes $12.50 and 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% where supported. Adaptive thinking is always on, default effort high; knowledge cutoff Jun 2026. Retirement not sooner than September 1, 2027.
MiniMax M3: MiniMax Standard $0.30/$1.20 per MTok through 512K input; above 512K $0.60/$2.40. Cache reads $0.06/$0.12. Priority is 1.5x the applicable Standard rate. The page labels these current rates permanent 50% off; future tariffs are not established. Subscription-key Credits/M Plan and PAYG balance are separate.
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 is Anthropic's model for the most demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work at $10/$50 — Anthropic now recommends Opus 5.5 as the default for most workloads.
Best for
- Frontier agents
- Hardest reasoning work
- Fable 5 workloads at the same price
Watch out
Standard token rates are 2.5x Opus 5.5's. Forced tool use errors; thinking blocks are model/conversation-bound, so editing earlier turns or switching models can invalidate them. Display updates and per-message effort are beta. Match benchmark settings and evaluate pinned workloads before migrating.
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 is an open-weight (community license) 428B MoE with native multimodal and 1M context.
Best for
- Open-weight deployments
- Multimodal
- Long-context
Watch out
Commercial checkpoint use requires Built with MiniMax M3 attribution and a one-time notice at or below $20M yearly revenue from the relevant products/services; above that threshold prior written authorization is required. Keep copyright/permission notices and follow prohibited-use terms. The checkpoint documents enabled/adaptive/disabled thinking. Hosted OpenAI compatibility defaults thinking on; Anthropic compatibility defaults it off and enables it with adaptive. Preview effort levels do not apply to M3. A hard output cap remains unverified.
When the cheaper one wins
MiniMax M3 is cheaper on output at $1.20 per million tokens against $50 for Claude Fable 5.1 — about 42×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. This compares standard short-context token rates, not total cost per accepted task. Include input, cache, context tiers, schedules, retries and review in your pilot.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: Medium
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 2/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: max output, parameter count, reasoning levels.
- No directly aligned benchmark setup — No benchmark has matching cited sources, source dates, units, effort and recorded run details on both models.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Older of the two catalog checks was 25 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- Claude Fable 5.1: Claude model overview — whole-profile source check October 1 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Fable 5.1: Claude current API pricing, caching and inference geography (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Fable 5.1: Anthropic pricing — Fable 5.1/Mythos 5.1 $10/$50 (accessed 2026-09-03)
- Claude Fable 5.1: Anthropic models overview — Fable 5.1 (1M context, 128K output) (accessed 2026-09-03)
- Claude Fable 5.1: Anthropic — Claude Fable and Mythos 5.1 announcement (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Claude Fable 5.1: Anthropic models overview — Opus 5.5 default; Fable 5.1 for demanding reasoning (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Claude Fable 5.1: Anthropic effort documentation (Fable 5.1 selectable effort) (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — Pay as You Go - MiniMax API Docs (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — Models - MiniMax API Docs (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — Model Invocation - MiniMax API Docs (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — OpenAI SDK - MiniMax API Docs (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — Anthropic SDK - MiniMax API Docs (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M3 · Hugging Face (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — LICENSE · MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M3 at main (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — MiniMax M3: Frontier Coding, 1M Context, Native Multimodality — All in One Model - MiniMax Research (accessed 2026-10-01)
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Mythos 5.1
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
Diving deeper on one model? Claude Fable 5.1 · MiniMax M3
Common questions
Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiniMax M3
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is Claude Fable 5.1 or MiniMax M3 cheaper for input?
Is Claude Fable 5.1 or MiniMax M3 cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or MiniMax M3?
Should I use Claude Fable 5.1 or MiniMax M3?
Can I self-host Claude Fable 5.1 or MiniMax M3?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 per 1M tokens versus $10 for Claude Fable 5.1 — a 33.3x difference at the headline tier.
- Deployment: MiniMax M3 publishes weights you can self-host; the other is API-only.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.