Skip to main content
AI Choice Engine

Model comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Fable 5.1

Two Anthropic tiers compared on the figures that decide which one a workload actually needs.

Claude Fable 5: profile checked October 25, 2026Claude Fable 5.1: profile checked October 25, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Medium — see receipts below

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

Frontier

vs

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.1

Frontier

AI model capability comparison
SpecificationClaude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
TierFrontierFrontier
Context window1M1M
Max output128K128K
Input / 1M tokens$10$10
Output / 1M tokens$50$50
WeightsClosedClosed
ParametersNot verifiedUnverifiedNot verifiedUnverified
Reasoning levelslow, medium, high, xhigh, maxlow, medium, high, xhigh, max
Modalitiestext, imagetext, image
API model idclaude-fable-5claude-fable-5-1
ReleasedJune 9, 2026September 1, 2026
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-10-01Not verifiedUnverified53
Humanity's Last Exam · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-09-01Not verifiedUnverified65
Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-09-26Not verifiedUnverified91.4
DeepSWE 1.1 · source date Claude Fable 5.1: 2026-09-03Not verifiedUnverified67.4

Dates beside benchmark scores refer to the linked source’s publication or capture date unless that source explicitly states when it measured the result. A shared URL alone does not establish comparable runs; unverified setups are marked. Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.

Benchmark receipts

Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.

Pricing tiers

Claude Fable 5: Standard USD/MTok input/output $10/$50 with no long-context surcharge; cache reads $1, 5-minute writes $12.50, 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% to input/output and cache reads/writes on Anthropic-operated routes where supported; Foundry uses US Data Zone Standard. Bedrock and Google-managed Google Cloud have independent regional prices. Adaptive thinking is always on; default effort high. Knowledge cutoff January 2026; retirement not sooner than June 9, 2027. Historical access suspension June 12 and restoration July 1, 2026 remain separate events. Server-side tools can add usage fees; tool schemas/results and thinking consume billable tokens.

Claude Fable 5.1: Standard USD/MTok input/output $10/$50 with no long-context surcharge; cache reads $0.25 versus Fable 5's $1, 5-minute writes $12.50, 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% to input/output and cache reads/writes on Anthropic-operated routes where supported; Foundry uses US Data Zone Standard. Bedrock and Google-managed Google Cloud have independent regional prices. Adaptive thinking is always on; default effort high. Knowledge cutoff June 2026; retirement not sooner than September 1, 2027. Server-side tools can add usage fees; tool schemas/results and thinking consume billable tokens.

FrontierRecord checked October 25, 2026

Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 is Anthropic's June 2026 long-running-agent model, now 'Active (legacy)' behind Fable 5.1 at the same $10/$50 price.

Best for

  • Long-running agents
  • Frontier reasoning
  • Enterprise work

Watch out

Superseded: Fable 5.1 has the same base input/output prices and lower cache-read pricing ($0.25 vs $1 per million tokens). Savings depend on eligible cached requests; evaluate the successor against your pinned workloads.

FrontierRecord checked October 25, 2026

Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Fable 5.1 is Anthropic's model for the most demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work at $10/$50 — Anthropic now recommends Opus 5.5 as the default for most workloads.

Best for

  • Frontier agents
  • Hardest reasoning work
  • Fable 5 workloads at the same price

Watch out

Standard token rates are 2.5x Opus 5.5's. Forced tool use errors; thinking blocks are model/conversation-bound, so editing earlier turns or switching models can invalidate them. Display updates and per-message effort are beta. Match benchmark settings and evaluate pinned workloads before migrating.

When the cheaper one wins

Both charge $50 per million output tokens at standard rates, so output price is not the split. Prefer the row whose “best for” line matches the job, then confirm the live vendor rate.

Run the model picker

Evidence confidence: Medium

How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.

  • Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
  • 4/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: parameter count.
  • No directly aligned benchmark setup — No benchmark has matching cited sources, source dates, units, effort and recorded run details on both models.
  • Verified within the last 90 days — Older of the two catalog checks was 1 day ago.
  • Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.

Source receipts

Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.

Common questions

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Fable 5.1

Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.

Is Claude Fable 5 or Claude Fable 5.1 cheaper for input?
Both list a base rate of $10 per million input tokens. Actual cost can differ with context tiers, caching, tools and other charges. Claude Fable 5: Standard USD/MTok input/output $10/$50 with no long-context surcharge; cache reads $1, 5-minute writes $12.50, 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% to input/output and cache reads/writes on Anthropic-operated routes where supported; Foundry uses US Data Zone Standard. Bedrock and Google-managed Google Cloud have independent regional prices. Adaptive thinking is always on; default effort high. Knowledge cutoff January 2026; retirement not sooner than June 9, 2027. Historical access suspension June 12 and restoration July 1, 2026 remain separate events. Server-side tools can add usage fees; tool schemas/results and thinking consume billable tokens. Claude Fable 5.1: Standard USD/MTok input/output $10/$50 with no long-context surcharge; cache reads $0.25 versus Fable 5's $1, 5-minute writes $12.50, 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% to input/output and cache reads/writes on Anthropic-operated routes where supported; Foundry uses US Data Zone Standard. Bedrock and Google-managed Google Cloud have independent regional prices. Adaptive thinking is always on; default effort high. Knowledge cutoff June 2026; retirement not sooner than September 1, 2027. Server-side tools can add usage fees; tool schemas/results and thinking consume billable tokens.
Is Claude Fable 5 or Claude Fable 5.1 cheaper for output?
Both list a base rate of $50 per million output tokens. Actual cost can differ with context tiers, caching, tools and other charges. Claude Fable 5: Standard USD/MTok input/output $10/$50 with no long-context surcharge; cache reads $1, 5-minute writes $12.50, 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% to input/output and cache reads/writes on Anthropic-operated routes where supported; Foundry uses US Data Zone Standard. Bedrock and Google-managed Google Cloud have independent regional prices. Adaptive thinking is always on; default effort high. Knowledge cutoff January 2026; retirement not sooner than June 9, 2027. Historical access suspension June 12 and restoration July 1, 2026 remain separate events. Server-side tools can add usage fees; tool schemas/results and thinking consume billable tokens. Claude Fable 5.1: Standard USD/MTok input/output $10/$50 with no long-context surcharge; cache reads $0.25 versus Fable 5's $1, 5-minute writes $12.50, 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% to input/output and cache reads/writes on Anthropic-operated routes where supported; Foundry uses US Data Zone Standard. Bedrock and Google-managed Google Cloud have independent regional prices. Adaptive thinking is always on; default effort high. Knowledge cutoff June 2026; retirement not sooner than September 1, 2027. Server-side tools can add usage fees; tool schemas/results and thinking consume billable tokens.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Fable 5.1?
Both accept about 1M tokens of context, so document length will not decide between them.
Do Claude Fable 5 and Claude Fable 5.1 support the same reasoning levels?
Both expose these named effort settings: "low", "medium", "high", "xhigh", "max". The same labels do not guarantee equal compute budgets or behavior across providers. Compare quality, latency and cost on your own tasks.
Should I use Claude Fable 5 or Claude Fable 5.1?
Both are classified in our frontier tier; this editorial grouping does not imply equal capability. Claude Fable 5 is a candidate for long-running agents; Claude Fable 5.1 is a candidate for frontier agents. Compare accuracy, tool reliability, latency and cost on representative tasks.

Next step

Choosing between them

The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.

These two models match on every verified catalog figure — the decision comes down to provider preference, availability, and workload fit rather than published numbers.

Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.