Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Two Google tiers compared on the figures that decide which one a workload actually needs.
Catalog record checked September 26, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: High — see receipts below
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Budget
| Specification | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | ||
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Budget | Budget |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | Winner: $0.25 | $0.30 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | Winner: $1.50 | $2.50 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | Not disclosedUnverified | Not disclosedUnverified |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | Not verifiedUnverified | low, medium, high |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image, video, audio, pdf | text, image, video, audio, pdf |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | gemini-3.1-flash-lite | gemini-3.5-flash-lite |
| Released | ||
| Released | May 7, 2026 | July 21, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-09-26) | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-09-26) | 15.6 | Winner: 22.2 |
Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- 2026-09-26Artificial Analysis
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check measuredAt.
Pricing tiers
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: $0.25 input (text, image, video; $0.50 audio) / $1.50 output per MTok; cached input $0.025. GA 2026-05-07 after a 2026-03-03 preview; shutdown no earlier than 2027-05-07.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: $0.30/$2.50 per MTok; cached input $0.03/MTok. Google's recommended Flash-Lite tier (the older 3.1 Flash-Lite lists $0.25/$1.50).
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is Google's cheapest current Gemini API model for high-volume, latency-sensitive pipelines.
Best for
- High-volume extraction
- Classification
- Cheap multimodal input
Watch out
Google recommends 3.5 Flash-Lite for new work, and 3.1 Flash-Lite's earliest shutdown date is 2027-05-07; well behind Flash models on reasoning.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is Google's recommended Flash-Lite tier for high-volume, latency-sensitive agent loops.
Best for
- High-volume agents
- Document pipelines
- Cost-sensitive multimodal
Watch out
Not Google's cheapest tier any more — Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite lists $0.25/$1.50; weaker than Flash on hard reasoning.
When the cheaper one wins
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is cheaper on output at $1.50 per million tokens against $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite — about 1.7×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: High
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 3/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: parameter count, reasoning levels.
- 1 shared named benchmark with differing scores — Measured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Newest catalog check was 2 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Gemini API pricing (gemini-3.1-flash-lite $0.25/$1.50) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Gemini API — gemini-3.1-flash-lite model card (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Gemini API deprecations (earliest shutdown 2027-05-07) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Google — Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Google Cloud Gemini pricing (accessed 2026-08-29)
Related comparisons
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- DeepSeek V3.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- DeepSeek V3.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Diving deeper on one model? Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Common questions
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite cheaper for input?
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?
Should I use Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite costs $0.25 per 1M tokens versus $0.30 for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite — a 1.2x difference at the headline tier.
- Measured capability: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 22.2 to 15.6 (measured 2026-09-26).
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.