Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs MiniMax M3
Google against MiniMax, compared on context, price, and attributed benchmark results.
Recorded profile verification October 2, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Medium — see receipts below
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Frontier
MiniMax
MiniMax M3
Frontier · Open weights
| Specification | Gemini 3.1 Pro | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | MiniMax | |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Frontier | Frontier |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | Winner: 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | 66K | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | $2 | Winner: $0.30 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | $12 | Winner: $1.20 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | Not verifiedUnverified | 428B total / 23B active (MoE) |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | low, medium, high | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image, video, audio, pdf | text, image, video |
| License | ||
| License | Not verifiedUnverified | MiniMax Community License |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | gemini-3.1-pro-preview | MiniMax-M3 |
| Released | ||
| Released | February 19, 2026 | June 1, 2026 |
| SWE-bench Verified · source date Gemini 3.1 Pro: 2026-02 | ||
| SWE-bench Verified · source date Gemini 3.1 Pro: 2026-02 | 80.6 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| GPQA Diamond · source date Gemini 3.1 Pro: 2026-02 | ||
| GPQA Diamond · source date Gemini 3.1 Pro: 2026-02 | 94.3 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date Gemini 3.1 Pro: 2026-02 | ||
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date Gemini 3.1 Pro: 2026-02 | 44.4 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Gemini 3.1 Pro: 2026-07, MiniMax M3: 2026-06-01 (comparability not verified) | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Gemini 3.1 Pro: 2026-07, MiniMax M3: 2026-06-01 (comparability not verified) | 73.8 | 66 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · source date MiniMax M3: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · source date MiniMax M3: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 29 |
Dates beside benchmark scores refer to the linked source’s publication or capture date unless that source explicitly states when it measured the result. A shared URL alone does not establish comparable runs; unverified setups are marked. Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- Source date2026-10-01Artificial Analysis (MiniMax-M3)
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check the cited source and its date.
- Source date2026-07Google DeepMind model evaluation report (vendor, Terminus-2; own Feb report separately reported TB 2.0 = 68.5 — versions preserved)
Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatNot comparable with Terminal-Bench 3.0 or 4.0 (different task sets) or v1; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
- Source date2026-06-01MiniMax vendor report: Terminus2, 8CPU/16GB sandbox, 2h, 128K generation budget; budget is not an API cap
Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatNot comparable with Terminal-Bench 3.0 or 4.0 (different task sets) or v1; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
- Source date2026-02Google DeepMind model evaluation report (vendor, no tools; 51.4 with search+code)
Frontier-knowledge ceiling: extremely hard multi-domain questions written to be near-impossible without deep expertise.
Comparable with caveatSubset/tool configurations (text-only vs with-tools) differ between vendors and materially change scores; must match configuration to compare.
- Source date2026-02Google DeepMind model evaluation report (vendor, no tools, pass@1)
Graduate-level science reasoning: multiple-choice questions written by domain PhDs.
Comparable with caveatDo not treat a fixed two-point band as universal measurement uncertainty; it depends on run count and evaluation setup. Chain-of-thought, prompt, and tool policy must match. The small pool limits fine-grained conclusions, and frontier scores can be near ceiling; Artificial Analysis dropped it from its Intelligence Index in v4.3.
- Source date2026-02Google DeepMind model evaluation report (vendor, Thinking High, avg of 10 runs, +0.6 disclosed adjustment)
Real GitHub issue resolution: does the model's patch pass the hidden tests.
Comparable with caveatPost-audit vendor claims and pre-audit scores sit on different task trust levels; scaffolding (agent harness, compute budget) also dominates results. Never aggregate across scaffolds.
Pricing tiers
Gemini 3.1 Pro: The current Gemini developer guide lists $2/$12 per MTok below 200K input and $4/$18 above 200K, including thinking output. It leaves the exact 200K boundary unspecified; confirm that boundary and other processing/cache tiers before budgeting. The exact API ID remains gemini-3.1-pro-preview. Restricted Gemini 4 Argon is a separate preview and does not make this endpoint stable.
MiniMax M3: MiniMax Standard $0.30/$1.20 per MTok through 512K input; above 512K $0.60/$2.40. Cache reads $0.06/$0.12. Priority is 1.5x the applicable Standard rate. The page labels these current rates permanent 50% off; future tariffs are not established. Subscription-key Credits/M Plan and PAYG balance are separate.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google's multimodal Pro endpoint with a 1,048,576-token input limit and 65,536-token output limit.
Best for
- Very long documents
- Multimodal reasoning
- Frontier knowledge work
Watch out
This API endpoint remains Preview. A separate customtools endpoint is optimized for bash/custom-tool workflows and can behave differently on other tasks. Keep endpoint, thinking level and benchmark version matched; restricted Gemini 4 Argon access is a separate lifecycle.
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 is an open-weight (community license) 428B MoE with native multimodal and 1M context.
Best for
- Open-weight deployments
- Multimodal
- Long-context
Watch out
Commercial checkpoint use requires Built with MiniMax M3 attribution and a one-time notice at or below $20M yearly revenue from the relevant products/services; above that threshold prior written authorization is required. Keep copyright/permission notices and follow prohibited-use terms. The checkpoint documents enabled/adaptive/disabled thinking. Hosted OpenAI compatibility defaults thinking on; Anthropic compatibility defaults it off and enables it with adaptive. Preview effort levels do not apply to M3. A hard output cap remains unverified.
When the cheaper one wins
MiniMax M3 is cheaper on output at $1.20 per million tokens against $12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro — about 10×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. This compares standard short-context token rates, not total cost per accepted task. Include input, cache, context tiers, schedules, retries and review in your pilot.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: Medium
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 2/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: max output, parameter count, reasoning levels.
- No directly aligned benchmark setup — No benchmark has matching cited sources, source dates, units, effort and recorded run details on both models.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Older of the two catalog checks was 25 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro: Google primary profile — whole-record source check October 1 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro: Gemini current API pricing and cache-storage tiers (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro: Gemini developer guide — exact Preview rates and boundary limitation (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro: Gemini API 3.1 Pro Preview — exact endpoint and customtools scope (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro: Google Cloud — Gemini 3.1 Pro (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro: TechCrunch — Gemini 3.1 Pro (accessed 2026-08-29)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — Pay as You Go - MiniMax API Docs (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — Models - MiniMax API Docs (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — Model Invocation - MiniMax API Docs (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — OpenAI SDK - MiniMax API Docs (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — Anthropic SDK - MiniMax API Docs (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M3 · Hugging Face (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — LICENSE · MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M3 at main (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — MiniMax M3: Frontier Coding, 1M Context, Native Multimodality — All in One Model - MiniMax Research (accessed 2026-10-01)
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiniMax M3
- Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
- Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax M3
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs MiniMax M3
Diving deeper on one model? Gemini 3.1 Pro · MiniMax M3
Common questions
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs MiniMax M3
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro or MiniMax M3 cheaper for input?
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro or MiniMax M3 cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro or MiniMax M3?
Should I use Gemini 3.1 Pro or MiniMax M3?
Can I self-host Gemini 3.1 Pro or MiniMax M3?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 per 1M tokens versus $2 for Gemini 3.1 Pro — a 6.7x difference at the headline tier.
- Context: Gemini 3.1 Pro takes 1.05M against 1M for MiniMax M3 — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
- Deployment: MiniMax M3 publishes weights you can self-host; the other is API-only.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.