Model comparison
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna
Google against OpenAI, compared on context, price, and attributed benchmark results.
Recorded profile verification October 1, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Medium — see receipts below
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Balanced
OpenAI
GPT-6 Luna
Budget
| Specification | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Balanced | Budget |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | 1.05M | Winner: 1.05M |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | 66K | Winner: 128K |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.75 | Winner: $0.10 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | $3.75 | Winner: $0.50 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | Not verifiedUnverified | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | minimal, low, medium, high | none, low, medium, high, xhigh, max |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image, video, audio, pdf | text, image |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | gemini-3.6-flash | gpt-6-luna |
| Released | ||
| Released | July 21, 2026 | September 22, 2026 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2026-07 | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2026-07 | 78 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| DeepSWE 1.1 · source date Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2026-08 | ||
| DeepSWE 1.1 · source date Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2026-08 | 48.6 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| DeepSWE 1.1 [max] · source date GPT-6 Luna: 2026-09-22 | ||
| DeepSWE 1.1 [max] · source date GPT-6 Luna: 2026-09-22 | Not verifiedUnverified | 66.6 |
| HLE-Verified · source date Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2026-08 | ||
| HLE-Verified · source date Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2026-08 | 51.2 | Not verifiedUnverified |
Dates beside benchmark scores refer to the linked source’s publication or capture date unless that source explicitly states when it measured the result. A shared URL alone does not establish comparable runs; unverified setups are marked. Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- Source date2026-09-22OpenAI — Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna (vendor-reported; separate from the Datacurve publisher capture)
Agentic software engineering: pass@1 on real repo tasks with reported cost per completed task.
Directly comparable
- Source date2026-08Google DeepMind model evaluation report (vendor; full 1,811-item HLE-Verified set) (Full 1,811-item verified/revised set; differs from original HLE and AA text-only HLE)
Expert reasoning on the verified and revised Humanity's Last Exam question set.
UnknownA distinct question set from original HLE and Artificial Analysis's text-only HLE. Shared dataset and publisher alone do not establish matching model effort, tools, filtering and run configuration; no quality winner is inferred without that evidence.
- Source date2026-08Google DeepMind August 3.7 evaluation report (quoting Datacurve for 3.6 Flash, 48.6%) (High thinking; quoted Datacurve result; July 3.6 report rounds to 49%)
Agentic software engineering: pass@1 on real repo tasks with reported cost per completed task.
Directly comparable
- Source date2026-07Google DeepMind model evaluation report (vendor, Terminus-2 harness)
Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatNot comparable with Terminal-Bench 3.0 or 4.0 (different task sets) or v1; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
Pricing tiers
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Intro Standard $0.75/$3.75 per MTok through December 31, 2026; $1.50/$7.50 from January 1, 2027. Output includes thinking tokens. Cached input $0.075, rising to $0.15; storage $0.50/MTok-hour, rising to $1. Batch/Flex input/output are $0.375/$1.875, rising to $0.75/$3.75. Priority $1.35/$6.75, rising to $2.70/$13.50. Grounding tools have separate charges and quotas; free-tier limits differ from paid.
GPT-6 Luna: Standard $0.10/$0.50 per MTok, compared with GPT-5.6 Luna’s $0.20/$1.20. Cached input $0.01 and cache writes $0.125. Above 272K the full request bills $0.20/$0.75, cached $0.02 and cache writes $0.25. Batch/Flex are half Standard; Fast is 2x. Regional/FedRAMP processing adds 10% where eligible. Knowledge cutoff May 18 2026.
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Gemini 3.6 Flash is Google's balanced multimodal Flash tier with a 1M-token context.
Best for
- Multimodal pipelines
- High-volume processing
- Video and audio input
Watch out
An earlier Flash model, still listed as stable. Google reports improvements on selected tasks for later releases; that does not establish a quality increase for every workload. Thinking includes minimal through high; computer use is Preview. Intro pricing doubles January 1, 2027.
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI’s GPT-6 budget tier for focused, high-volume tasks, with text/image input, text output and a 1.05M-token context at $0.10/$0.50 per million tokens.
Best for
- High-volume chat and extraction
- Classification
- Cost-capped agent loops
Watch out
Use Responses for tools; Chat Completions supports function calling only with reasoning_effort none. A September 25 image-encoding fix can affect older visual evaluations. The DeepSWE result is vendor-reported at max effort; an index score alone does not establish quality on your tasks.
When the cheaper one wins
GPT-6 Luna is cheaper on output at $0.50 per million tokens against $3.75 for Gemini 3.6 Flash — about 7.5×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. This compares standard short-context token rates, not total cost per accepted task. Include input, cache, context tiers, schedules, retries and review in your pilot.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: Medium
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 4/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: parameter count.
- No directly aligned benchmark setup — No benchmark has matching cited sources, source dates, units, effort and recorded run details on both models.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Older of the two catalog checks was 25 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- Gemini 3.6 Flash: Google primary profile — whole-record source check October 1 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Gemini 3.6 Flash: Gemini current API pricing and cache-storage tiers (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Gemini 3.6 Flash: Gemini thinking — model-specific Interactions levels (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Gemini 3.6 Flash: Google — Gemini 3.6 Flash (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Gemini 3.6 Flash: Google Cloud Gemini pricing (accessed 2026-08-29)
- GPT-6 Luna: OpenAI model card — whole-profile source check October 1 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- GPT-6 Luna: OpenAI current API pricing and processing tiers (accessed 2026-10-01)
- GPT-6 Luna: OpenAI API changelog — exact release date, checked October 1 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- GPT-6 Luna: OpenAI — Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna (accessed 2026-09-26)
- GPT-6 Luna: OpenAI model docs — gpt-6-luna (1.05M context, 128K output) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- GPT-6 Luna: OpenAI API pricing (gpt-6-luna $0.10/$0.50, cached $0.01) (accessed 2026-09-26)
Related comparisons
- Amazon Nova 2 Lite vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
- Amazon Nova 2 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
- Base 1 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-6 Luna
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
Diving deeper on one model? Gemini 3.6 Flash · GPT-6 Luna
Common questions
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Luna cheaper for input?
Is Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Luna cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Luna?
Do Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-6 Luna support the same reasoning levels?
Should I use Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Luna?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 per 1M tokens versus $0.75 for Gemini 3.6 Flash — a 7.5x difference at the headline tier.
- Context: GPT-6 Luna takes 1.05M against 1.05M for Gemini 3.6 Flash — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
- Positioning: Gemini 3.6 Flash sits in the balanced tier, GPT-6 Luna in the budget tier. Compare accuracy, reliability, latency, and cost on representative tasks before choosing.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.