Skip to main content
AI Choice Engine

Google

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash is a Google model with 1.05M context, $0.75 in / $3.75 out per million tokens, last verified October 1, 2026. Open weights: no. Public-board scores are linked to the publisher; vendor-only figures stay in the watch-out, not on the board.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is Google's multimodal Flash model for long-horizon software engineering and agent workflows, with current introductory API pricing through December 31, 2026.

Recorded profile verification October 1, 2026Individual provider fields may change

AI model specification details
SpecificationGemini 3.8 Flash
ProviderGoogle
TierBalanced
Context window1.05M
Max output66K
Input / 1M tokens$0.75
Output / 1M tokens$3.75
WeightsClosed
ParametersNot verifiedUnverified
Reasoning levelslow, medium, high
Modalitiestext, image, video, audio, pdf
API model idgemini-3.8-flash
ReleasedSeptember 2, 2026

Pricing tiers: Intro Standard $0.75/$3.75 per MTok through December 31, 2026; $1.50/$7.50 from January 1, 2027. Output includes thinking tokens. Cached input $0.075, rising to $0.15; storage $0.50/MTok-hour, rising to $1. Batch/Flex input/output are $0.375/$1.875, rising to $0.75/$3.75. Priority $1.35/$6.75, rising to $2.70/$13.50. Grounding tools have separate charges and quotas; free-tier limits differ from paid.

Publisher evidence

Published benchmark results

Each result keeps its source date visible. Dates refer to source publication or capture unless the source explicitly states when it measured the result. A missing benchmark is not treated as a zero.

Published benchmark results for Gemini 3.8 Flash
BenchmarkScoreSource dateSource
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [high]Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)412026-10-01Artificial Analysis · View source
Terminal-Bench 2.1Vendor evaluation; Terminus-2 harness; exact run date not published89.4%2026-09-02Google primary evaluation table and methodology (vendor-reported) · View source
HLE-VerifiedFull 1,811-item verified/revised set; differs from original HLE and AA text-only HLE54.9%2026-09-02Google official blog and methodology (vendor; full 1,811-item HLE-Verified set) · View source

Benchmark

DeepSWE 1.1 in context

The full local snapshot puts this model beside the wider field, including cost per completed task.

Local leader

GPT-6 Astra [xhigh]

74.1%

Rows shown

28

Best source-matched Pass@1 per model

Snapshot date

2026-10-01

Mirrored from deepswe.datacurve.ai

DeepSWE 1.1 pass@10%16%32%48%64%80%$0$4.50$9.00$13.50$18.00$22.50$27.00Avg cost per taskGPT-6 Astra [xhigh]: 74.1% · $4.43 · 30k tokens · 29 stepsGemini 3.8 Flash [high]: 73.8% · $2.36 · 143k tokens · 166 stepsClaude Opus 5 [max]: 73.6% · $11.84 · 118k tokens · 99 stepsGPT-5.6 Sol [max]: 72.7% · $8.39 · 60k tokens · 61 stepsClaude Fable 5 [xhigh]: 69.9% · $13.41 · 80k tokens · 68 stepsGPT-5.6 Terra [max]: 69.6% · $4.95 · 72k tokens · 76 stepsGLM 5.3 [max]: 69.0% · $3.99 · 80k tokens · 124 stepsKimi K3 [max]: 68.5% · $4.65 · 82k tokens · 98 stepsGrok 4.6 [medium]: 67.5% · $3.45 · 50k tokens · 70 stepsGPT-5.6 Luna [max]: 67.2% · $3.03 · 73k tokens · 102 stepsGPT-5.5 [xhigh]: 67.0% · $7.23 · 46k tokens · 82 stepsGemini 3.7 Flash [medium]: 65.5% · $2.03 · 94k tokens · 117 stepsGLM 5.3 Flash [max]: 63.4% · $0.48 · 73k tokens · 123 stepsDeepSeek V4-Pro [max]: 62.8% · $0.24 · 106k tokens · 155 stepsClaude Opus 4.8 [max]: 59.0% · $13.22 · 135k tokens · 120 stepsQwen3.8-Max [xhigh]: 57.5% · $3.73 · 95k tokens · 111 stepsMuse Spark 1.2 [xhigh]: 54.9% · $3.70 · 99k tokens · 101 stepsClaude Sonnet 5 [max]: 53.8% · $26.40 · 214k tokens · 268 stepsGrok 4.5 [high]: 53.8% · $2.42 · 36k tokens · 61 stepsDeepSeek V4-Flash [max]: 53.3% · $0.10 · 108k tokens · 153 stepsMuse Spark 1.1 [xhigh]: 53.3% · $2.36 · 74k tokens · 96 stepsGPT-5.4 [xhigh]: 51.8% · $5.65 · 71k tokens · 70 stepsGemini 3.6 Flash [high]: 46.7% · $4.42 · 96k tokens · 117 stepsGLM 5.2 [max]: 43.8% · $3.92 · 78k tokens · 129 stepsGemini 3.5 Flash [high]: 36.1% · $3.45 · 76k tokens · 105 stepsKimi K2.7 Code: 30.5% · $2.82 · 59k tokens · 149 stepsClaude Sonnet 4.6 [high]: 29.9% · $5.52 · 76k tokens · 134 stepsGemini 3.1 Pro [high]: 11.7% · $2.14 · 28k tokens · 76 steps

Better is toward the top-right (higher pass rate, lower cost). X-axis is reversed to match DeepSWE’s public chart. v1.1 uses average cost, output tokens and steps. Legacy v1 transcriptions are excluded here until an exact primary receipt is retained.

DeepSWE 1.1 leaderboard with pass rate, cost, tokens, and steps per task
#ModelPass@1Cost / taskTokens / taskSteps / task
1GPT-6 Astra [xhigh]74.1%$4.4330k29
2Gemini 3.8 Flash [high]73.8%$2.36143k166
3Claude Opus 5 [max]73.6%$11.84118k99
4GPT-5.6 Sol [max]72.7%$8.3960k61
5Claude Fable 5 [xhigh]69.9%$13.4180k68
6GPT-5.6 Terra [max]69.6%$4.9572k76
7GLM 5.3 [max]69.0%$3.9980k124
8Kimi K3 [max]68.5%$4.6582k98
9Grok 4.6 [medium]67.5%$3.4550k70
10GPT-5.6 Luna [max]67.2%$3.0373k102
11GPT-5.5 [xhigh]67.0%$7.2346k82
12Gemini 3.7 Flash [medium]65.5%$2.0394k117
13GLM 5.3 Flash [max]63.4%$0.4873k123
14DeepSeek V4-Pro [max]62.8%$0.24106k155
15Claude Opus 4.8 [max]59.0%$13.22135k120
16Qwen3.8-Max [xhigh]57.5%$3.7395k111
17Muse Spark 1.2 [xhigh]54.9%$3.7099k101
18Claude Sonnet 5 [max]53.8%$26.40214k268
19Grok 4.5 [high]53.8%$2.4236k61
20DeepSeek V4-Flash [max]53.3%$0.10108k153
21Muse Spark 1.1 [xhigh]53.3%$2.3674k96
22GPT-5.4 [xhigh]51.8%$5.6571k70
23Gemini 3.6 Flash [high]46.7%$4.4296k117
24GLM 5.2 [max]43.8%$3.9278k129
25Gemini 3.5 Flash [high]36.1%$3.4576k105
26Kimi K2.7 Code30.5%$2.8259k149
27Claude Sonnet 4.6 [high]29.9%$5.5276k134
28Gemini 3.1 Pro [high]11.7%$2.1428k76

“Best per model” shows each model’s highest source-matched Pass@1 in this capture; switch to all effort levels to see every retained configuration. Efforts differ across models, so this view is not a comparison at matched effort. The source was generated September 22 and captured October 1. Small gaps may not be statistically meaningful — confirm on deepswe.datacurve.ai.

Best for

  • Agentic coding at scale
  • Mid-difficulty engineering
  • Multimodal pipelines

Watch out

Intro rates and cache-storage prices double January 1, 2027. Google says 3.8 can use more tokens at higher effort; 3.7 remains supported for efficiency-first workloads. Minimal thinking errors. Computer use is Preview; native audio/image generation and Live API are unsupported. Restricted Flash Cyber is a separate endpoint with no public rate confirmed.

History

Gemini 3.8 Flash timeline

Release and status events for this model that passed two-source verification — dated, sourced, and linked.

  • Gemini 3.8 Flash + Flash CyberReleaseSeptember 2, 2026

    Google unveils Gemini 3.8 Flash workhorse with 89.4% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Google's table) and companion defensive cyber edition via the Fairwind Program.

    Google DeepMind — Gemini 3.8 Flash announcement

Common questions

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.

How much does Gemini 3.8 Flash cost per million tokens?
Gemini 3.8 Flash lists base rates of $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens. Estimate both input and output token volume and any additional charges for your workload. Intro Standard $0.75/$3.75 per MTok through December 31, 2026; $1.50/$7.50 from January 1, 2027. Output includes thinking tokens. Cached input $0.075, rising to $0.15; storage $0.50/MTok-hour, rising to $1. Batch/Flex input/output are $0.375/$1.875, rising to $0.75/$3.75. Priority $1.35/$6.75, rising to $2.70/$13.50. Grounding tools have separate charges and quotas; free-tier limits differ from paid.
What is Gemini 3.8 Flash's context window?
Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts about 1.05M tokens of context. That only matters if you routinely send very long documents, large codebases, or multi-turn histories that approach that limit.
What is Gemini 3.8 Flash best for?
Gemini 3.8 Flash is a balanced tier from Google. It suits agentic coding at scale, mid-difficulty engineering, multimodal pipelines. Intro rates and cache-storage prices double January 1, 2027. Google says 3.8 can use more tokens at higher effort; 3.7 remains supported for efficiency-first workloads. Minimal thinking errors. Computer use is Preview; native audio/image generation and Live API are unsupported. Restricted Flash Cyber is a separate endpoint with no public rate confirmed.