Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3
OpenAI against Meta, compared on context, price, and verified benchmark results.
Catalog record checked September 5, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Medium — see receipts below
OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Pro
Frontier
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Frontier
| Specification | GPT-5.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Tier | Frontier | Frontier |
| Context window | Winner: 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | Winner: 131K |
| Input / 1M tokens | $30 | Winner: $1.25 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $180 | Winner: $4.25 |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Parameters | Not disclosedUnverified | Meta frontier model |
| Reasoning levels | none, low, medium, high, xhigh, max | low, medium, high |
| Modalities | text, image | text, image |
| API model id | gpt-5.5-pro | muse-spark-1.3 |
| Released | April 23, 2026 | September 2, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [xhigh] (2026-08-14) | 60 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| DeepSWE 1.1 (2026-09-02) | Not verifiedUnverified | 75.4 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (2026-09-03) | Not verifiedUnverified | 88.8 |
Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
- 2026-09-03: Meta launch table (transcribed by explainx.ai) (Vendor self-report; absent from the official tbench.ai leaderboard)Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment. Comparability: comparable with caveat — Scores across Terminal-Bench major versions (v1 vs v2) are NOT comparable; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
- 2026-09-02: Meta launch table (Thinking mode: max — self-reported; not broadly available and NOT on the official Datacurve leaderboard)Agentic software engineering: pass@1 on real repo tasks with reported cost per completed task. Comparability: directly comparable
- 2026-08-14: Artificial AnalysisComposite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score. Comparability: directly comparable — AA occasionally rebaselines the index scale between snapshots — a score captured on one date is only comparable to same-snapshot scores (check measuredAt).
Pricing tiers: GPT-5.5 Pro: Standard $30/$180 per MTok; no cached-input discount. Batch $15/$90. · Muse Spark 1.3: $1.25/$4.25 per MTok on Meta's Model API (cached input $0.15); a $0.10/$0.20 'contributor' tier applies when your data is used for training. Third-party reports put list at $1.50/$7.50 from 2027-01-01 — confirm before long-term commits.
GPT-5.5 Pro
GPT-5.5 Pro is OpenAI's highest-effort tier for maximal accuracy on the hardest tasks.
Best for
- Maximum-accuracy reasoning
- Research
- Hard enterprise workloads
Watch out
At $30/$180 per MTok it is the most expensive OpenAI tier; reserve for work that needs it.
Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3 is Meta's September 2026 frontier refresh — a self-reported DeepSWE 1.1 field leader at $1.25/$4.25, with a 1M-token context aimed at autonomous agent workflows.
Best for
- Long-horizon coding agents
- Frontier quality below frontier pricing
- Meta ecosystem
Watch out
The headline 75.4% DeepSWE score comes from the 'max' thinking mode, which is not broadly available yet and is pending independent verification. The 131,072 output cap is per third-party API docs — Meta's own spec page does not publish it. Closed weights, unlike Muse Spark 1.1.
When the cheaper one wins
Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper on output at $4.25 per million tokens against $180 for GPT-5.5 Pro — about 42×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: Medium
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 4/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: parameter count.
- No shared named benchmark — No benchmark has been measured on both models.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Newest catalog check was 6 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- GPT-5.5 Pro: OpenAI — Introducing GPT-5.5 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- GPT-5.5 Pro: OpenAI API pricing (gpt-5.5-pro $30/$180) (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Muse Spark 1.3: Meta — Introducing Muse Spark 1.3 (accessed 2026-09-03)
- Muse Spark 1.3: Meta developer — Muse Spark pricing ($1.25/$4.25) (accessed 2026-09-03)
- Muse Spark 1.3: VentureBeat — Muse Spark 1.3 best results need a config developers can't broadly use yet (accessed 2026-09-03)
- Muse Spark 1.3: HaiMaker — muse-spark-1.3 (131,072 max output tokens) (accessed 2026-09-05)
- Muse Spark 1.3: Promptfoo — Meta provider docs (muse-spark-1.3 max_tokens ceiling) (accessed 2026-09-05)
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.5 Pro
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro
- Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs GPT-5.5 Pro
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3
Diving deeper on one model? GPT-5.5 Pro · Muse Spark 1.3
Common questions
GPT-5.5 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is GPT-5.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3 cheaper for input?
Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper at $1.25 per million input tokens, against $30 for GPT-5.5 Pro — roughly 24× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; GPT-5.5 Pro has tiered pricing: Standard $30/$180 per MTok; no cached-input discount. Batch $15/$90. Muse Spark 1.3 has tiered pricing: $1.25/$4.25 per MTok on Meta's Model API (cached input $0.15); a $0.10/$0.20 'contributor' tier applies when your data is used for training. Third-party reports put list at $1.50/$7.50 from 2027-01-01 — confirm before long-term commits.
Is GPT-5.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3 cheaper for output?
Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper at $4.25 per million output tokens, against $180 for GPT-5.5 Pro — roughly 42× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; GPT-5.5 Pro has tiered pricing: Standard $30/$180 per MTok; no cached-input discount. Batch $15/$90. Muse Spark 1.3 has tiered pricing: $1.25/$4.25 per MTok on Meta's Model API (cached input $0.15); a $0.10/$0.20 'contributor' tier applies when your data is used for training. Third-party reports put list at $1.50/$7.50 from 2027-01-01 — confirm before long-term commits.
Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3?
GPT-5.5 Pro accepts 1.05M tokens against 1M for Muse Spark 1.3. This only matters if you routinely send very long documents or large codebases.
Do GPT-5.5 Pro and Muse Spark 1.3 support the same reasoning levels?
GPT-5.5 Pro exposes none, low, medium, high, xhigh, max, while Muse Spark 1.3 exposes low, medium, high.
Should I use GPT-5.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3?
Both sit in the frontier tier, so the choice usually comes down to price and context rather than capability. GPT-5.5 Pro suits maximum-accuracy reasoning; Muse Spark 1.3 suits long-horizon coding agents.
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 per 1M tokens versus $30 for GPT-5.5 Pro — a 24x difference at the headline tier.
- Context: GPT-5.5 Pro takes 1.05M against 1M for Muse Spark 1.3 — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.