Model comparison
Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3
Anthropic against Meta, compared on context, price, and attributed benchmark results.
Recorded profile verification October 2, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Medium — see receipts below
Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1
Frontier
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Frontier
| Specification | Claude Mythos 5.1 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Frontier | Frontier |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | 1M | Winner: 1.05M |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | 128K | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | $10 | Winner: $1.25 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | $50 | Winner: $4.25 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | Not verifiedUnverified | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | low, medium, high, xhigh, max | minimal, low, medium, high, xhigh, max |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image | text, image, video, audio, pdf |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | claude-mythos-5-1 | muse-spark-1.3 |
| Released | ||
| Released | September 1, 2026 | September 2, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] · source date Muse Spark 1.3: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] · source date Muse Spark 1.3: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 48 |
| DeepSWE 1.1 · source date Muse Spark 1.3: 2026-09-02 | ||
| DeepSWE 1.1 · source date Muse Spark 1.3: 2026-09-02 | Not verifiedUnverified | 75.4 |
Dates beside benchmark scores refer to the linked source’s publication or capture date unless that source explicitly states when it measured the result. A shared URL alone does not establish comparable runs; unverified setups are marked. Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- Source date2026-10-01Artificial Analysis (Muse Spark 1.3 (max))
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check the cited source and its date.
- Source date2026-09-02Meta launch table (Meta max / mini-swe-agent; vendor chart 75.4 versus Spark 1.2 xhigh 55.0; source publication September 2, experiment date unverified; separate from Datacurve xhigh row)
Agentic software engineering: pass@1 on real repo tasks with reported cost per completed task.
Directly comparable
Pricing tiers
Claude Mythos 5.1: Standard $10/$50 per MTok, sharing Fable 5.1's specifications/pricing. Cache reads $0.25; 5-minute writes $12.50 and 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% where supported. Invite-only for vetted US organisations; API ID claude-mythos-5-1. Retirement not sooner than September 1, 2027; this is a minimum commitment, not an announced shutdown.
Muse Spark 1.3: Meta Standard $1.25/$4.25 per MTok, cached $0.15; prompts/completions are not used for training. Contributor uses a distinct SKU at $0.10/$0.20, cached $0.002, and permits training on prompts/completions. No long-context premium. Search grounding adds $2.50 per 1,000 queries.
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic describes Claude Mythos 5.1 as its most capable model for cybersecurity and biology research — the Fable 5.1 model with fewer cyber/bio safeguards, restricted to vetted US organisations.
Best for
- Cyber-defence research
- Biology research
- Claude Security workloads
Watch out
Invite-only for vetted US organisations through trusted access programmes, with 30-day retention required by default for safety monitoring. Adaptive thinking cannot be disabled and forced tool use errors. Shared underlying model does not make Fable benchmark results Mythos observations; safeguards and access differ.
Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3 is Meta's September 2026 frontier refresh with a 1M-token context for coding and agent workflows.
Best for
- Long-horizon coding agents
- Frontier quality below frontier pricing
- Meta ecosystem
Watch out
Max effort is Standard Spark 1.3 only; Contributor and Spark 1.2 lack it. None returns HTTP 400; omitted effort is model-determined. Reasoning counts toward output budget and billing. Spark 1.3 audio may degrade; Meta directs audio work to 1.2 or Voice Transcribe. Standard 3,000 RPM/4M TPM versus Contributor 100 RPM/3M TPM quotas apply per team. Exact output cap and parameter count remain unknown. Meta's 75.4% DeepSWE max/mini-swe-agent report is separate from independent xhigh observations.
When the cheaper one wins
Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper on output at $4.25 per million tokens against $50 for Claude Mythos 5.1 — about 12×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. This compares standard short-context token rates, not total cost per accepted task. Include input, cache, context tiers, schedules, retries and review in your pilot.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: Medium
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 3/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: max output, parameter count.
- No directly aligned benchmark setup — No benchmark has matching cited sources, source dates, units, effort and recorded run details on both models.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Older of the two catalog checks was 25 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Claude model overview — whole-profile source check October 1 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Claude current API pricing, caching and inference geography (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Anthropic — Claude Mythos (accessed 2026-09-03)
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Anthropic — model deprecations (claude-mythos-5) (accessed 2026-09-03)
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Anthropic — Mythos 5.1 overview (1M context, 128K output, claude-mythos-5-1) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Anthropic selectable effort levels (separate from adaptive thinking mode) (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Muse Spark 1.3: Meta — Models (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Muse Spark 1.3: Meta — Pricing and rate limits (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Muse Spark 1.3: Meta — Reasoning (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Muse Spark 1.3: Meta — Chat completions schemas (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Muse Spark 1.3: Meta — Introducing Muse Spark 1.3 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Muse Spark 1.3: Meta — Muse Spark 1.3 Multimodal Evaluation Methodology (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Muse Spark 1.3: Meta — Meta vendor benchmark scorecard (visually checked) (accessed 2026-10-01)
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Mythos 5.1
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Mythos 5.1
- Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Mythos 5.1
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5
Diving deeper on one model? Claude Mythos 5.1 · Muse Spark 1.3
Common questions
Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is Claude Mythos 5.1 or Muse Spark 1.3 cheaper for input?
Is Claude Mythos 5.1 or Muse Spark 1.3 cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Muse Spark 1.3?
Do Claude Mythos 5.1 and Muse Spark 1.3 support the same reasoning levels?
Should I use Claude Mythos 5.1 or Muse Spark 1.3?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 per 1M tokens versus $10 for Claude Mythos 5.1 — a 8x difference at the headline tier.
- Context: Muse Spark 1.3 takes 1.05M against 1M for Claude Mythos 5.1 — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.