Model comparison
Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Mythos 5.1
Two Anthropic tiers compared on the figures that decide which one a workload actually needs.
Claude Fable 5: profile checked October 25, 2026Claude Mythos 5.1: profile checked October 25, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Medium — see receipts below
Anthropic
Claude Fable 5
Frontier
Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1
Frontier
| Specification | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Mythos 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Frontier | Frontier |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | $10 | $10 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | $50 | $50 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | Not verifiedUnverified | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | low, medium, high, xhigh, max | low, medium, high, xhigh, max |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image | text, image |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | claude-fable-5 | claude-mythos-5-1 |
| Released | ||
| Released | June 9, 2026 | September 1, 2026 |
Dates beside benchmark scores refer to the linked source’s publication or capture date unless that source explicitly states when it measured the result. A shared URL alone does not establish comparable runs; unverified setups are marked. Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Pricing tiers
Claude Fable 5: Standard USD/MTok input/output $10/$50 with no long-context surcharge; cache reads $1, 5-minute writes $12.50, 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% to input/output and cache reads/writes on Anthropic-operated routes where supported; Foundry uses US Data Zone Standard. Bedrock and Google-managed Google Cloud have independent regional prices. Adaptive thinking is always on; default effort high. Knowledge cutoff January 2026; retirement not sooner than June 9, 2027. Historical access suspension June 12 and restoration July 1, 2026 remain separate events. Server-side tools can add usage fees; tool schemas/results and thinking consume billable tokens.
Claude Mythos 5.1: Standard USD/MTok input/output $10/$50, matching Fable 5.1; cache reads $0.25, 5-minute writes $12.50, 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% to input/output and cache reads/writes on Anthropic-operated routes where supported; Foundry uses US Data Zone Standard. Bedrock and Google-managed Google Cloud have independent regional prices. Access requires verification; the public API ID does not grant entitlement. Retirement not sooner than September 1, 2027 is a minimum commitment, not an announced shutdown. Server-side tools can add usage fees; tool schemas/results and thinking consume billable tokens.
Claude Fable 5
Claude Fable 5 is Anthropic's June 2026 long-running-agent model, now 'Active (legacy)' behind Fable 5.1 at the same $10/$50 price.
Best for
- Long-running agents
- Frontier reasoning
- Enterprise work
Watch out
Superseded: Fable 5.1 has the same base input/output prices and lower cache-read pricing ($0.25 vs $1 per million tokens). Savings depend on eligible cached requests; evaluate the successor against your pinned workloads.
Claude Mythos 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1's underlying capabilities for organisations verified for cybersecurity or life-sciences research, with different cyber/bio safeguards and access controls.
Best for
- Cyber-defence research
- Biology research
- Claude Security workloads
Watch out
Access requires an applicable verification programme; current primary sources do not establish a universal country eligibility list. Accepting 30-day data retention for safety monitoring is required by default. Adaptive thinking is always on and forced tool use errors. Shared underlying capabilities do not make Fable benchmark results Mythos observations; safeguards, fallback behavior and evaluation setups differ.
When the cheaper one wins
Both charge $50 per million output tokens at standard rates, so output price is not the split. Prefer the row whose “best for” line matches the job, then confirm the live vendor rate.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: Medium
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 4/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: parameter count.
- No directly aligned benchmark setup — No benchmark has matching cited sources, source dates, units, effort and recorded run details on both models.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Older of the two catalog checks was 1 day ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- Claude Fable 5: Whole-record source check: exact model card (accessed 2026-10-25)
- Claude Fable 5: Whole-record source check: current publisher pricing, controls or access terms (accessed 2026-10-25)
- Claude Fable 5: Whole-record source check: current publisher pricing, controls or access terms (accessed 2026-10-25)
- Claude Fable 5: Whole-record source check: current publisher pricing, controls or access terms (accessed 2026-10-25)
- Claude Fable 5: Anthropic news — Claude Fable 5 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Whole-record source check: exact model card (accessed 2026-10-25)
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Whole-record source check: current publisher pricing, controls or access terms (accessed 2026-10-25)
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Whole-record source check: current publisher pricing, controls or access terms (accessed 2026-10-25)
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Whole-record source check: current publisher pricing, controls or access terms (accessed 2026-10-25)
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Whole-record source check: current publisher pricing, controls or access terms (accessed 2026-10-25)
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Mythos 5.1
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Fable 5.1
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 5
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 5.5
Diving deeper on one model? Claude Fable 5 · Claude Mythos 5.1
Common questions
Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Mythos 5.1
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is Claude Fable 5 or Claude Mythos 5.1 cheaper for input?
Is Claude Fable 5 or Claude Mythos 5.1 cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Mythos 5.1?
Do Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5.1 support the same reasoning levels?
Should I use Claude Fable 5 or Claude Mythos 5.1?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
These two models match on every verified catalog figure — the decision comes down to provider preference, availability, and workload fit rather than published numbers.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.