Model comparison
Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5
Two Anthropic tiers compared on the figures that decide which one a workload actually needs.
Recorded profile verification October 1, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Medium — see receipts below
Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1
Frontier
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5
Frontier
| Specification | Claude Mythos 5.1 | Claude Opus 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Frontier | Frontier |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | $10 | Winner: $5 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | $50 | Winner: $25 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | Not verifiedUnverified | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | low, medium, high, xhigh, max | low, medium, high, xhigh, max |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image | text, image |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | claude-mythos-5-1 | claude-opus-5 |
| Released | ||
| Released | September 1, 2026 | July 24, 2026 |
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date Claude Opus 5: 2026-09-01 | ||
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date Claude Opus 5: 2026-09-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 63.6 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Claude Opus 5: 2026-09-02 | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date Claude Opus 5: 2026-09-02 | Not verifiedUnverified | 89.1 |
Dates beside benchmark scores refer to the linked source’s publication or capture date unless that source explicitly states when it measured the result. A shared URL alone does not establish comparable runs; unverified setups are marked. Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- Source date2026-09-02Google Gemini 3.8 Flash evaluation table quoting public leaderboard / Artificial Analysis, Terminus 2; not a Google-run Opus evaluation (Cross-provider quotation; common effort and experiment date unverified)
Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatNot comparable with Terminal-Bench 3.0 or 4.0 (different task sets) or v1; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
- Source date2026-09-01Anthropic Fable 5.1 comparison table (vendor, with tools; 56.6 no tools)
Frontier-knowledge ceiling: extremely hard multi-domain questions written to be near-impossible without deep expertise.
Comparable with caveatSubset/tool configurations (text-only vs with-tools) differ between vendors and materially change scores; must match configuration to compare.
Pricing tiers
Claude Mythos 5.1: Standard $10/$50 per MTok, sharing Fable 5.1's specifications/pricing. Cache reads $0.25; 5-minute writes $12.50 and 1-hour writes $20. Batch $5/$25. US-only inference adds 10% where supported. Invite-only for vetted US organisations; API ID claude-mythos-5-1. Retirement not sooner than September 1, 2027; this is a minimum commitment, not an announced shutdown.
Claude Opus 5: Standard $5/$25 per MTok with no long-context surcharge. Cache reads $0.50; 5-minute writes $6.25 and 1-hour writes $10. Batch $2.50/$12.50. First-party Fast research preview $10/$50, unavailable with Batch. US-only inference adds 10% where supported. Batch 300K output requires output-300k-2026-03-24; standard stays 128K. Knowledge cutoff May 2026; retirement not sooner than July 24, 2027.
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic describes Claude Mythos 5.1 as its most capable model for cybersecurity and biology research — the Fable 5.1 model with fewer cyber/bio safeguards, restricted to vetted US organisations.
Best for
- Cyber-defence research
- Biology research
- Claude Security workloads
Watch out
Invite-only for vetted US organisations through trusted access programmes, with 30-day retention required by default for safety monitoring. Adaptive thinking cannot be disabled and forced tool use errors. Shared underlying model does not make Fable benchmark results Mythos observations; safeguards and access differ.
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 is Anthropic's July 2026 agentic-coding model, now 'Active (legacy)'. Its successor Opus 5.5 has lower base input/output prices ($4/$20 vs $5/$25 per million tokens); performance depends on the workload and evaluation settings.
Best for
- Complex agentic coding
- Enterprise work
- Long-context analysis
Watch out
Active legacy, superseded by Opus 5.5. Test migration: Opus 5.5 makes adaptive thinking always on, rejects forced tool use and the older computer-use tool, and changes thinking-block/progress behavior. Partner cloud lifecycles and prices can differ.
When the cheaper one wins
Claude Opus 5 is cheaper on output at $25 per million tokens against $50 for Claude Mythos 5.1 — about 2.0×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. This compares standard short-context token rates, not total cost per accepted task. Include input, cache, context tiers, schedules, retries and review in your pilot.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: Medium
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 4/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: parameter count.
- No directly aligned benchmark setup — No benchmark has matching cited sources, source dates, units, effort and recorded run details on both models.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Older of the two catalog checks was 25 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Claude model overview — whole-profile source check October 1 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Claude current API pricing, caching and inference geography (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Anthropic — Claude Mythos (accessed 2026-09-03)
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Anthropic — model deprecations (claude-mythos-5) (accessed 2026-09-03)
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Anthropic — Mythos 5.1 overview (1M context, 128K output, claude-mythos-5-1) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Claude Mythos 5.1: Anthropic selectable effort levels (separate from adaptive thinking mode) (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Opus 5: Claude model overview — whole-profile source check October 1 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Opus 5: Claude current API pricing, caching and inference geography (accessed 2026-10-01)
- Claude Opus 5: Anthropic — Claude Opus 5 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Claude Opus 5: Anthropic news — Claude Opus 5 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Claude Opus 5: Anthropic — Claude Opus 5.5 (Opus 5 successor) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Claude Opus 5: Anthropic selectable effort levels (separate from adaptive thinking mode) (accessed 2026-10-01)
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Mythos 5.1
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Mythos 5.1
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 5
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Mythos 5.1
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5
Diving deeper on one model? Claude Mythos 5.1 · Claude Opus 5
Common questions
Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is Claude Mythos 5.1 or Claude Opus 5 cheaper for input?
Is Claude Mythos 5.1 or Claude Opus 5 cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Claude Opus 5?
Do Claude Mythos 5.1 and Claude Opus 5 support the same reasoning levels?
Should I use Claude Mythos 5.1 or Claude Opus 5?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: Claude Opus 5 costs $5 per 1M tokens versus $10 for Claude Mythos 5.1 — a 2x difference at the headline tier.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.