Model comparison
GPT-5.6 Sol vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro
OpenAI against Xiaomi, compared on context, price, and verified benchmark results.
Catalog record checked September 26, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Medium — see receipts below
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol
Frontier
Xiaomi
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Frontier · Open weights
| Specification | GPT-5.6 Sol | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | OpenAI | Xiaomi |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Frontier | Frontier |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | Winner: 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | 128K | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | $4 | Winner: $0.435 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | $20 | Winner: $0.87 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | previous-generation reasoning + coding model | 1.02T total / 42B active (MoE) |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | none, low, medium, high, xhigh, max | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image | text, image, video, audio |
| License | ||
| License | Not disclosedUnverified | MIT |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | gpt-5.6-sol | mimo-v2.6-pro |
| Released | ||
| Released | July 9, 2026 | September 21, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] (2026-09-26) | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] (2026-09-26) | 47 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-09-26) | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-09-26) | Not verifiedUnverified | 46.3 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (2026-07-09) | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (2026-07-09) | 88.8 | Winner: 89.9 |
| GPQA Diamond (2026-07-09) | ||
| GPQA Diamond (2026-07-09) | 94.6 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| DeepSWE 1.1 (2026-09-21) | ||
| DeepSWE 1.1 (2026-09-21) | Not verifiedUnverified | 71.9 |
Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- 2026-09-26Artificial Analysis
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check measuredAt.
- 2026-09-21Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 announcement (vendor)
Agentic software engineering: pass@1 on real repo tasks with reported cost per completed task.
Directly comparable
- 2026-07-09OpenAI — GPT-5.6 evals table (vendor)
Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatNot comparable with Terminal-Bench 3.0 or 4.0 (different task sets) or v1; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
Pricing tiers
GPT-5.6 Sol: Launch list was $5/$30; cut to $4/$20 on 2026-08-21, promo held at least through 2026-11-21. Above 272K input the whole request bills 2x input / 1.5x output ($8/$30). Cached input $0.40/MTok; cache writes 1.25x input; batch $2/$10. Knowledge cutoff Feb 16 2026.
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro: $0.435/$0.87 per MTok (cache hit $0.0036; cache writes free for a limited time) — unchanged from V2.5-Pro. UltraSpeed mode (mimo-v2.6-pro-ultraspeed) costs $4.35/$8.70. Open weights (MIT) as MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL.
GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Sol was OpenAI's GPT-5.6 flagship for complex reasoning and coding with a 1.05M-token context — superseded on 2026-09-22 by GPT-6 Sol at half the price.
Best for
- Complex reasoning
- Agentic coding
- Hard knowledge work
Watch out
Superseded: GPT-6 Sol lists $2/$10, half this row's $4/$20 promo rate, and scores higher on the Artificial Analysis index. Still served; 'max' effort and 'ultra' multi-agent mode multiply token use.
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is Xiaomi's open-weight (MIT) 1.02T MoE with omni-modal input and a 1M context — the top open-weight model on the Artificial Analysis index at under $1 per million output tokens.
Best for
- Open-weight frontier work
- Omni-modal input
- Cheap long-context API
Watch out
Max output is not verified; vendor benchmark claims (DeepSWE 71.9) are not yet independently reproduced.
When the cheaper one wins
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper on output at $0.87 per million tokens against $20 for GPT-5.6 Sol — about 23×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: Medium
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 3/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: max output, reasoning levels.
- 2 shared named benchmarks (scores match) — Measured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Terminal-Bench 2.1 — scores are equivalent, so the benchmark does not separate the pair.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Newest catalog check was 2 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- GPT-5.6 Sol: OpenAI — GPT-5.6 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- GPT-5.6 Sol: OpenAI API pricing (gpt-5.6-sol $4/$20) (accessed 2026-08-29)
- GPT-5.6 Sol: OpenAI — Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna (GPT-5.6 Sol successor) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro: Xiaomi — MiMo-V2.6 (pricing, benchmarks) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro: Hugging Face — XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL (MIT, 1.02T/42B, 1M) (accessed 2026-09-26)
Related comparisons
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol
- Claude Fable 5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol
Diving deeper on one model? GPT-5.6 Sol · Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Common questions
GPT-5.6 Sol vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is GPT-5.6 Sol or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro cheaper for input?
Is GPT-5.6 Sol or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.6 Sol or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Should I use GPT-5.6 Sol or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Can I self-host GPT-5.6 Sol or Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.435 per 1M tokens versus $4 for GPT-5.6 Sol — a 9.2x difference at the headline tier.
- Context: GPT-5.6 Sol takes 1.05M against 1.05M for Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
- Measured capability: GPT-5.6 Sol leads Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 47 to 46.3 (measured 2026-09-26).
- Deployment: Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro publishes weights you can self-host; the other is API-only.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.