Skip to main content
AI Choice EngineAI Choice Engine

Model comparison

Kimi K3 vs MiniMax M3

Moonshot AI against MiniMax, compared on context, price, and verified benchmark results.

Catalog record checked September 5, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: High — see receipts below

Moonshot AI

Kimi K3

Frontier · Open weights

vs

MiniMax

MiniMax M3

Frontier · Open weights

AI model capability comparison
SpecificationKimi K3MiniMax M3
ProviderMoonshot AIMiniMax
TierFrontierFrontier
Context windowWinner: 1.05M1M
Max output128KNot verifiedUnverified
Input / 1M tokens$3Winner: $0.30
Output / 1M tokens$15Winner: $1.20
WeightsOpenOpen
Parameters2.8T (open-weight MoE)428B total / 23B active (MoE)
Reasoning levelslow, high, maxlow, high, max
Modalitiestext, image, videotext, image, video
API model idkimi-k3minimax-m3
ReleasedJuly 16, 2026June 1, 2026
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] (2026-08-14)60Not verifiedUnverified
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-08-14)Not verifiedUnverified51
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (2026-07-27)Winner: 88.366
GPQA Diamond (2026-07-27)93.5Not verifiedUnverified
Humanity's Last Exam (2026-07-27)56Not verifiedUnverified
SWE-bench Verified (2026-09-01)93.4Not verifiedUnverified

Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.

Benchmark receipts

Pricing tiers: Kimi K3: $3/$15 per MTok; cached input $0.30/MTok. Open-weight under the custom Kimi K3 License (not a standard open-source licence). 2.8T MoE with native vision. · MiniMax M3: $0.30/$1.20 per MTok; open (community license). 428B/23B active MoE, native multimodal. Rate is the ≤512K-prompt tier; higher above.

FrontierOpen weightsRecord checked September 3, 2026

Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is Moonshot AI's open-weight frontier model — 2.8T MoE, 1M context, tied near the top of open-weight leaderboards.

Best for

  • Open-weight frontier work
  • Long-context
  • Multimodal

Watch out

Self-hosting needs large clusters; hosted rates vary.

FrontierOpen weightsRecord checked September 5, 2026

MiniMax M3

MiniMax M3 is an open-weight (community license) 428B MoE with native multimodal and 1M context.

Best for

  • Open-weight deployments
  • Multimodal
  • Long-context

Watch out

Community license, not fully open; verify terms.

When the cheaper one wins

MiniMax M3 is cheaper on output at $1.20 per million tokens against $15 for Kimi K3 — about 13×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.

Run the model picker

Evidence confidence: High

How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.

  • Pricing verified on both sidesInput and output rates are verified for both models.
  • 4/5 core specs verified on both sidesNot published for at least one side: max output.
  • 2 shared named benchmarks with differing scoresMeasured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Terminal-Bench 2.1.
  • Verified within the last 90 daysNewest catalog check was 6 days ago.
  • Both models carry source citationsEach side has at least two catalog sources on record.

Source receipts

Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.

Common questions

Kimi K3 vs MiniMax M3

Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.

Is Kimi K3 or MiniMax M3 cheaper for input?

MiniMax M3 is cheaper at $0.30 per million input tokens, against $3 for Kimi K3 — roughly 10× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; Kimi K3 has tiered pricing: $3/$15 per MTok; cached input $0.30/MTok. Open-weight under the custom Kimi K3 License (not a standard open-source licence). 2.8T MoE with native vision. MiniMax M3 has tiered pricing: $0.30/$1.20 per MTok; open (community license). 428B/23B active MoE, native multimodal. Rate is the ≤512K-prompt tier; higher above.

Is Kimi K3 or MiniMax M3 cheaper for output?

MiniMax M3 is cheaper at $1.20 per million output tokens, against $15 for Kimi K3 — roughly 13× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; Kimi K3 has tiered pricing: $3/$15 per MTok; cached input $0.30/MTok. Open-weight under the custom Kimi K3 License (not a standard open-source licence). 2.8T MoE with native vision. MiniMax M3 has tiered pricing: $0.30/$1.20 per MTok; open (community license). 428B/23B active MoE, native multimodal. Rate is the ≤512K-prompt tier; higher above.

Which has the larger context window, Kimi K3 or MiniMax M3?

Kimi K3 accepts 1.05M tokens against 1M for MiniMax M3. This only matters if you routinely send very long documents or large codebases.

Do Kimi K3 and MiniMax M3 support the same reasoning levels?

Yes — both accept the same effort settings: "low", "high", "max". Higher effort costs more and takes longer, so start low and raise it only where output quality actually improves.

Should I use Kimi K3 or MiniMax M3?

Both sit in the frontier tier, so the choice usually comes down to price and context rather than capability. Kimi K3 suits open-weight frontier work; MiniMax M3 suits open-weight deployments.

Next step

Choosing between them

The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.

  • Input price: MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 per 1M tokens versus $3 for Kimi K3 — a 10x difference at the headline tier.
  • Context: Kimi K3 takes 1.05M against 1M for MiniMax M3 — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
  • Measured capability: Kimi K3 leads Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 60 to 51 (measured 2026-08-14).

Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.