Model comparison
Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next
Mistral against Qwen, compared on context, price, and verified benchmark results.
Catalog record checked September 26, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: High — see receipts below
Mistral
Mistral Small 4
Budget · Open weights
Qwen
Qwen 3.8 Flash Next
Budget · Open weights
| Specification | Mistral Small 4 | Qwen 3.8 Flash Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | Mistral | Qwen |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Budget | Budget |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | Not verifiedUnverified | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.15 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.60 | Winner: $0.47 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | 119B total / 6.5B active (MoE) | 125B total / 6B active (MoE) + 51B n-gram embedding table |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | Not verifiedUnverified | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image | text, image, video |
| License | ||
| License | Apache 2.0 | qwen-community-1.0 |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | mistral-small-2603 | qwen3.8-flash |
| Released | ||
| Released | March 16, 2026 | August 26, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-09-26) | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-09-26) | 11.3 | Winner: 39.8 |
Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- 2026-09-26Artificial Analysis
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check measuredAt.
Pricing tiers
Mistral Small 4: Mistral first-party API $0.15/$0.60 per MTok. Open weights (Apache 2.0). 119B total / 6.5B active MoE.
Qwen 3.8 Flash Next: Hosted qwen3.8-flash lists $0.15/$0.47 per MTok on Alibaba Cloud Model Studio with a 1M context. The open checkpoint is 262,144 tokens native, extensible to 1M.
Mistral Small 4
Mistral Small 4 is Mistral's low-cost Apache-2.0 MoE — 6.5B active parameters with a 256K context and image input.
Best for
- Cheap EU-hosted inference
- Open-weight self-hosting
- High-volume extraction
Watch out
Small active size: not for hard reasoning or agentic coding; max output is not published.
Qwen 3.8 Flash Next
Qwen 3.8 Flash Next is Alibaba's experimental preview of the Qwen 4 architecture — very low active parameters plus an unusual n-gram embedding component for cheap long-context.
Best for
- Early testing of Qwen 4 architecture
- Cheap high-throughput work
- Multimodal input
Watch out
Experimental preview; qwen-community-1.0 license is more restrictive than MIT/Apache; benchmark claims are vendor-reported.
When the cheaper one wins
Qwen 3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on output at $0.47 per million tokens against $0.60 for Mistral Small 4 — about 1.3×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: High
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 3/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: max output, reasoning levels.
- 1 shared named benchmark with differing scores — Measured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Newest catalog check was 2 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- Mistral Small 4: Mistral docs — Mistral Small 4 (26.03) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Mistral Small 4: Mistral changelog (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Qwen 3.8 Flash Next: The New Stack — Qwen3.8-Flash previews Qwen4 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Qwen 3.8 Flash Next: Yotta Labs — Qwen 3.8-Flash-Next specs (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Qwen 3.8 Flash Next: Hugging Face — Qwen/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Qwen 3.8 Flash Next: Alibaba Cloud Model Studio pricing (qwen3.8-flash $0.15/$0.47) (accessed 2026-09-26)
Related comparisons
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Small 4
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next
- DeepSeek V3.1 vs Mistral Small 4
- DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Mistral Small 4
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next
Diving deeper on one model? Mistral Small 4 · Qwen 3.8 Flash Next
Common questions
Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is Mistral Small 4 or Qwen 3.8 Flash Next cheaper for input?
Is Mistral Small 4 or Qwen 3.8 Flash Next cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, Mistral Small 4 or Qwen 3.8 Flash Next?
Should I use Mistral Small 4 or Qwen 3.8 Flash Next?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
These two models match on every verified catalog figure — the decision comes down to provider preference, availability, and workload fit rather than published numbers.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.