Model comparison
Qwen 3.8 Max vs Upstage Solar Pro 4
Qwen against Upstage, compared on context, price, and verified benchmark results.
Catalog record checked September 3, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: High — see receipts below
Qwen
Qwen 3.8 Max
Frontier · Open weights
Upstage
Upstage Solar Pro 4
Frontier
| Specification | Qwen 3.8 Max | Upstage Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | Upstage |
| Tier | Frontier | Frontier |
| Context window | Winner: 991K | 524K |
| Max output | 131K | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Input / 1M tokens | $2 | Winner: $0.30 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $6 | Winner: $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Parameters | 2.4T total / 95B active (MoE) | Not disclosedUnverified |
| Reasoning levels | low, high, max | low, medium, high |
| Modalities | text, image, video | text |
| API model id | qwen3.8-max | solar-pro-4 |
| Released | August 3, 2026 | August 10, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-08-14) | Winner: 58 | 50 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (2026-08-03) | 86.6 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| GPQA Diamond (2026-08-03) | 92.6 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Humanity's Last Exam (2026-08-14) | 56.2 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| SWE-bench Verified (2026-09-01) | 85.6 | Not verifiedUnverified |
Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
- 2026-09-01: vals.ai SWE-bench Verified leaderboard (independent, mini-swe-agent bash-only); not published by Qwen (official used SWE-bench Pro 67.7)Real GitHub issue resolution: does the model's patch pass the hidden tests. Comparability: comparable with caveat — Post-audit vendor claims and pre-audit scores sit on different task trust levels; scaffolding (agent harness, compute budget) also dominates results. Never aggregate across scaffolds.
- 2026-08-14: Z.ai GLM-5.3 blog (independent Z.ai-run, with tools; Qwen official no-tools 43.6 — both preserved)Frontier-knowledge ceiling: extremely hard multi-domain questions written to be near-impossible without deep expertise. Comparability: comparable with caveat — Subset/tool configurations (text-only vs with-tools) differ between vendors and materially change scores; must match configuration to compare.
- 2026-08-14: Artificial AnalysisComposite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score. Comparability: directly comparable — AA occasionally rebaselines the index scale between snapshots — a score captured on one date is only comparable to same-snapshot scores (check measuredAt).
- 2026-08-03: Qwen official blog (vendor-run table)Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment. Comparability: comparable with caveat — Scores across Terminal-Bench major versions (v1 vs v2) are NOT comparable; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
Pricing tiers: Qwen 3.8 Max: $2/$6 per MTok (Alibaba Cloud Model Studio). Weights announced open, verify they have dropped. · Upstage Solar Pro 4: List $0.30/$1.20 per MTok; live promo rate is $0.03/$0.12 (90% off through 2026-09-10). Closed API. 524K context.
Qwen 3.8 Max
Qwen 3.8 Max is Alibaba's flagship — 2.4T MoE with 1M-class context, near frontier on the Intelligence Index.
Best for
- Open-weight frontier work
- Long-context
- Multimodal
Watch out
Open weights dropped 2026-08-12 under a custom (non-Apache) licence with vision and 1M-context stripped from the open checkpoint — the open checkpoint is not the full API model. Verify the licence before commercial use.
Upstage Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 4 is Upstage's closed flagship with a 524K context at a low launch price.
Best for
- Long-context
- Cost-sensitive API
- Korean + English
Watch out
Closed API; promo pricing may end.
When the cheaper one wins
Upstage Solar Pro 4 is cheaper on output at $1.20 per million tokens against $6 for Qwen 3.8 Max — about 5.0×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: High
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 3/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: max output, parameter count.
- 1 shared named benchmark with differing scores — Measured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Newest catalog check was 8 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- Qwen 3.8 Max: Qwen — Qwen 3.8 Max (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Qwen 3.8 Max: Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Upstage Solar Pro 4: Upstage — Solar Pro 4 (accessed 2026-08-29)
- Upstage Solar Pro 4: Upstage (accessed 2026-08-29)
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen 3.8 Max
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Upstage Solar Pro 4
- Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max
- Claude Fable 5 vs Upstage Solar Pro 4
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Qwen 3.8 Max
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Upstage Solar Pro 4
Diving deeper on one model? Qwen 3.8 Max · Upstage Solar Pro 4
Common questions
Qwen 3.8 Max vs Upstage Solar Pro 4
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is Qwen 3.8 Max or Upstage Solar Pro 4 cheaper for input?
Upstage Solar Pro 4 is cheaper at $0.30 per million input tokens, against $2 for Qwen 3.8 Max — roughly 6.7× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; Qwen 3.8 Max has tiered pricing: $2/$6 per MTok (Alibaba Cloud Model Studio). Weights announced open, verify they have dropped. Upstage Solar Pro 4 has tiered pricing: List $0.30/$1.20 per MTok; live promo rate is $0.03/$0.12 (90% off through 2026-09-10). Closed API. 524K context.
Is Qwen 3.8 Max or Upstage Solar Pro 4 cheaper for output?
Upstage Solar Pro 4 is cheaper at $1.20 per million output tokens, against $6 for Qwen 3.8 Max — roughly 5.0× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; Qwen 3.8 Max has tiered pricing: $2/$6 per MTok (Alibaba Cloud Model Studio). Weights announced open, verify they have dropped. Upstage Solar Pro 4 has tiered pricing: List $0.30/$1.20 per MTok; live promo rate is $0.03/$0.12 (90% off through 2026-09-10). Closed API. 524K context.
Which has the larger context window, Qwen 3.8 Max or Upstage Solar Pro 4?
Qwen 3.8 Max accepts 991K tokens against 524K for Upstage Solar Pro 4. This only matters if you routinely send very long documents or large codebases.
Do Qwen 3.8 Max and Upstage Solar Pro 4 support the same reasoning levels?
Qwen 3.8 Max exposes low, high, max, while Upstage Solar Pro 4 exposes low, medium, high.
Should I use Qwen 3.8 Max or Upstage Solar Pro 4?
Both sit in the frontier tier, so the choice usually comes down to price and context rather than capability. Qwen 3.8 Max suits open-weight frontier work; Upstage Solar Pro 4 suits long-context.
Can I self-host Qwen 3.8 Max or Upstage Solar Pro 4?
Qwen 3.8 Max publishes open weights, but self-hosting and third-party provider access depend on the licence, hardware, serving support, and availability. Upstage Solar Pro 4 is a closed model whose supported access paths are controlled by its provider.
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: Upstage Solar Pro 4 costs $0.30 per 1M tokens versus $2 for Qwen 3.8 Max — a 6.7x difference at the headline tier.
- Context: Qwen 3.8 Max takes 991K against 524K for Upstage Solar Pro 4 — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
- Measured capability: Qwen 3.8 Max leads Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 58 to 50 (measured 2026-08-14).
- Deployment: Qwen 3.8 Max publishes weights you can self-host; the other is API-only.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.