Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.4 Nano
Google against OpenAI, compared on context, price, and verified benchmark results.
Catalog record checked September 26, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: High — see receipts below
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Budget
OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Nano
Budget
| Specification | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.4 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Budget | Budget |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | Winner: 1.05M | 400K |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | 66K | Winner: 128K |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.25 | Winner: $0.20 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.50 | Winner: $1.25 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | Not disclosedUnverified | Not disclosedUnverified |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | Not verifiedUnverified | none, low, medium, high, xhigh |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image, video, audio, pdf | text, image |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | gemini-3.1-flash-lite | gpt-5.4-nano |
| Released | ||
| Released | May 7, 2026 | March 17, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-09-26) | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026-09-26) | 15.6 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [xhigh] (2026-09-26) | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [xhigh] (2026-09-26) | Not verifiedUnverified | 20.7 |
Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- 2026-09-26Artificial Analysis
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check measuredAt.
Pricing tiers
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: $0.25 input (text, image, video; $0.50 audio) / $1.50 output per MTok; cached input $0.025. GA 2026-05-07 after a 2026-03-03 preview; shutdown no earlier than 2027-05-07.
GPT-5.4 Nano: Standard $0.20/$1.25 per MTok; cached input $0.02/MTok; batch $0.10/$0.625.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is Google's cheapest current Gemini API model for high-volume, latency-sensitive pipelines.
Best for
- High-volume extraction
- Classification
- Cheap multimodal input
Watch out
Google recommends 3.5 Flash-Lite for new work, and 3.1 Flash-Lite's earliest shutdown date is 2027-05-07; well behind Flash models on reasoning.
GPT-5.4 Nano
GPT-5.4 Nano is OpenAI's small classification and extraction tier at $0.20/$1.25 — no longer its cheapest model (GPT-6 Luna lists $0.10/$0.50).
Best for
- Classification
- Summarisation
- High-volume chat
Watch out
Smallest tier; not for hard reasoning or coding.
When the cheaper one wins
GPT-5.4 Nano is cheaper on output at $1.25 per million tokens against $1.50 for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite — about 1.2×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: High
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 3/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: parameter count, reasoning levels.
- 1 shared named benchmark with differing scores — Measured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Newest catalog check was 2 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Gemini API pricing (gemini-3.1-flash-lite $0.25/$1.50) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Gemini API — gemini-3.1-flash-lite model card (accessed 2026-09-26)
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Gemini API deprecations (earliest shutdown 2027-05-07) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- GPT-5.4 Nano: OpenAI — GPT-5.4 Mini & Nano (accessed 2026-08-29)
- GPT-5.4 Nano: OpenAI API pricing (gpt-5.4-nano $0.20/$1.25) (accessed 2026-08-29)
Related comparisons
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.4 Nano
- DeepSeek V3.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- DeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-5.4 Nano
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Diving deeper on one model? Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite · GPT-5.4 Nano
Common questions
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.4 Nano
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or GPT-5.4 Nano cheaper for input?
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or GPT-5.4 Nano cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or GPT-5.4 Nano?
Should I use Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or GPT-5.4 Nano?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.20 per 1M tokens versus $0.25 for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite — a 1.3x difference at the headline tier.
- Context: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite takes 1.05M against 400K for GPT-5.4 Nano — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
- Measured capability: GPT-5.4 Nano leads Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 20.7 to 15.6 (measured 2026-09-26).
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.