Model comparison

GPT-6 Astra vs Muse Spark 1.2

OpenAI against Meta, compared on context, price, and verified benchmark results.

Catalog record checked September 26, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: High — see receipts below

OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra

Frontier

Meta

Muse Spark 1.2

Frontier

AI model capability comparison
Specification	GPT-6 Astra	Muse Spark 1.2
Provider
Provider	OpenAI	Meta
Tier
Tier	Frontier	Frontier
Context window
Context window	Winner: 1.05M	1.05M
Max output
Max output	128K	Not verifiedUnverified
Input / 1M tokens
Input / 1M tokens	$10	Winner: $1.25
Output / 1M tokens
Output / 1M tokens	$50	Winner: $4.25
Weights
Weights	Closed	Closed
Parameters
Parameters	overall flagship (reasoning, coding, computer use)	Meta frontier model
Reasoning levels
Reasoning levels	low, medium, high, xhigh, max	minimal, low, medium, high, xhigh, max
Modalities
Modalities	text, image	text, image, video, audio, pdf
API model id
API model id	gpt-6-astra	muse-spark-1.2
Released
Released	September 3, 2026	August 5, 2026
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] (2026-09-26)
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] (2026-09-26)	52.7	Not verifiedUnverified
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [xhigh] (2026-09-26)
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [xhigh] (2026-09-26)	Not verifiedUnverified	39.6
DeepSWE 1.1 (2026-09-03)
DeepSWE 1.1 (2026-09-03)	74.1	Not verifiedUnverified
OSWorld 2.0 (offline) (2026-09-03)
OSWorld 2.0 (offline) (2026-09-03)	72.6	Not verifiedUnverified
GPQA Diamond (2026-09-03)
GPQA Diamond (2026-09-03)	96	Not verifiedUnverified
Humanity's Last Exam (2026-09-03)
Humanity's Last Exam (2026-09-03)	57.2	Not verifiedUnverified
Terminal-Bench 4.0 [xhigh] (2026-09-26)
Terminal-Bench 4.0 [xhigh] (2026-09-26)	59.6	Not verifiedUnverified
Terminal-Bench 2.1 [xhigh] (2026-09-26)
Terminal-Bench 2.1 [xhigh] (2026-09-26)	89.1	Not verifiedUnverified

Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Bold indicates the better figure where one is objectively better. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.

Benchmark receipts

Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.

2026-09-26
Artificial Analysis Terminal-Bench 2.1 (independent, Terminus 2 harness)
Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatNot comparable with Terminal-Bench 3.0 or 4.0 (different task sets) or v1; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
2026-09-26
Artificial Analysis Terminal-Bench 4.0 (independent AA run, part of Intelligence Index v4.3.2)
Agentic terminal work: long multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatNOT comparable with Terminal-Bench 2.x or 3.0 — 4.0 uses a new, non-overlapping task set. Within 4.0, scores from different harnesses (tbench.ai agent entries vs Artificial Analysis runs) are not interchangeable.
2026-09-26
Artificial Analysis
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check measuredAt.
2026-09-03
OpenAI GPT-6 Astra launch chart (vendor, with tools; transcribed by Vellum)
Agentic software engineering: pass@1 on real repo tasks with reported cost per completed task.
Directly comparable

Pricing tiers

GPT-6 Astra: Standard $10/$50 per MTok (≤272K input); above 272K input the whole request bills $20/$75. Cached input $1/MTok; cache writes $12.50 (1.25x input). Batch/Flex $5/$25. Fast mode costs 2x for up to 2x the speed ($20/$100 short context, $40/$150 long). Knowledge cutoff Apr 30 2026. Rolled out from 2026-09-03; Enterprise tenants get it disabled by default.

Muse Spark 1.2: $1.25/$4.25 per MTok on Meta's Model API (Standard tier shared with Muse Spark 1.3; cached input $0.15). Closed weights.

FrontierRecord checked September 26, 2026

GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra is OpenAI's overall flagship — its most capable model for complex reasoning, coding and computer use, and the first it gates at the Preparedness Framework's 'Critical' cybersecurity threshold.

Best for

Computer-use agents
Agentic coding
Hard reasoning

Watch out

Gated at the 'Critical' cyber threshold and disabled by default for Enterprise; long-context work bills $20/$75 above 272K input tokens. GPT-6 Sol ($2/$10) covers most work at a fifth of the price.

FrontierRecord checked September 26, 2026

Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is Meta's closed frontier model until the 1.3 refresh (2026-09-02) — still served and ranked in the LMArena text top 10 as of mid-2026.

Best for

Frontier reasoning
Meta ecosystem
Agentic work

Watch out

Closed-weights (unlike Llama 4); Meta's post-Llama-4 frontier branding.

Benchmark

DeepSWE 1.1 in context

Only GPT-6 Astra has a published DeepSWE 1.1 result. It is shown against the wider field, with cost per completed task alongside the score.

Local leader

GPT-6 Astra [xhigh]

74%

Rows shown

Best published Pass@1 per model (Datacurve's default view)

Snapshot date

2026-09-26

Mirrored from deepswe.datacurve.ai

Better is toward the top-right (higher pass rate, lower cost). X-axis is reversed to match DeepSWE’s public chart. v1.1 uses average cost / tokens / steps; v1 uses published medians.

DeepSWE 1.1 leaderboard with pass rate, cost, tokens, and steps per task
#	Model	Pass@1	Cost / task	Tokens / task	Steps / task
1	GPT-6 Astra [xhigh]	74%	$4.43	30k	29
2	Gemini 3.8 Flash [high]	74%	$2.36	143k	166
3	Claude Opus 5 [max]	74%	$11.84	118k	99
4	GPT-5.6 Sol [max]	73%	$8.39	60k	61
5	Claude Fable 5 [xhigh]	70%	$13.41	80k	68
6	GPT-5.6 Terra [max]	70%	$4.95	72k	76
7	GLM 5.3 [max]	69%	$3.99	80k	124
8	Kimi K3 [max]	69%	$4.65	82k	98
9	Grok 4.6 [medium]	68%	$3.45	50k	70
10	GPT-5.6 Luna [max]	67%	$3.03	73k	102
11	GPT-5.5 [xhigh]	67%	$7.23	46k	82
12	Gemini 3.7 Flash [medium]	66%	$2.03	94k	117
13	GLM 5.3 Flash [max]	63%	$0.48	73k	123
14	DeepSeek V4-Pro [max]	63%	$0.24	106k	155
15	Claude Opus 4.8 [max]	59%	$13.22	135k	120
16	Qwen3.8-Max [xhigh]	58%	$3.73	95k	111
17	Muse Spark 1.2 [xhigh]	55%	$3.70	99k	101
18	Claude Sonnet 5 [max]	54%	$26.40	214k	268
19	Grok 4.5 [high]	54%	$2.42	36k	61
20	DeepSeek V4-Flash [max]	53%	$0.10	108k	153
21	Muse Spark 1.1 [xhigh]	53%	$2.36	74k	96
22	GPT-5.4 [xhigh]	52%	$5.65	71k	70
23	Gemini 3.6 Flash [high]	47%	$4.42	96k	117
24	GLM 5.2 [max]	44%	$3.92	78k	129
25	Gemini 3.5 Flash [high]	36%	$3.45	76k	105
26	Kimi K2.7 Code	31%	$2.82	59k	149
27	Claude Sonnet 4.6 [high]	30%	$5.52	76k	134
28	Gemini 3.1 Pro [high]	12%	$2.14	28k	76

“Best per model” shows each model’s highest published Pass@1, as Datacurve’s own board does; switch to all effort levels to see every configuration. Small gaps may not be statistically meaningful — confirm on deepswe.datacurve.ai.

When the cheaper one wins

Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper on output at $4.25 per million tokens against $50 for GPT-6 Astra — about 12×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. On DeepSWE 1.1, Muse Spark 1.2 is 54.9% Pass@1 at $3.7/task versus GPT-6 Astra at 74.1% / $4.43/task. These are standard-tier API rates, excluding batch and cache discounts.

Run the model picker

Evidence confidence: High

How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.

Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
4/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: max output.
1 shared named benchmark with differing scores — Measured on: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Verified within the last 90 days — Newest catalog check was 2 days ago.
Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.

Source receipts

Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.

GPT-6 Astra: OpenAI — Introducing GPT-6 Astra (accessed 2026-09-03)
GPT-6 Astra: OpenAI API pricing (gpt-6-astra $10/$50) (accessed 2026-09-03)
GPT-6 Astra: CNBC — OpenAI launches GPT-6 Astra (accessed 2026-09-03)
GPT-6 Astra: OpenAI model docs — gpt-6-astra (128K max output, effort levels) (accessed 2026-09-05)
GPT-6 Astra: OpenAI API pricing (gpt-6-astra ≤272K $10/$50, >272K $20/$75) (accessed 2026-09-26)
Muse Spark 1.2: Meta — Muse (accessed 2026-08-29)
Muse Spark 1.2: Muse version tracking (accessed 2026-08-29)
Muse Spark 1.2: Meta Model API — pricing and rate limits (Standard tier $1.25/$4.25) (accessed 2026-09-26)

Related comparisons

Diving deeper on one model? GPT-6 Astra · Muse Spark 1.2

Common questions

GPT-6 Astra vs Muse Spark 1.2

Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.

Is GPT-6 Astra or Muse Spark 1.2 cheaper for input?

Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper at $1.25 per million input tokens, against $10 for GPT-6 Astra — roughly 8.0× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; GPT-6 Astra has tiered pricing: Standard $10/$50 per MTok (≤272K input); above 272K input the whole request bills $20/$75. Cached input $1/MTok; cache writes $12.50 (1.25x input). Batch/Flex $5/$25. Fast mode costs 2x for up to 2x the speed ($20/$100 short context, $40/$150 long). Knowledge cutoff Apr 30 2026. Rolled out from 2026-09-03; Enterprise tenants get it disabled by default. Muse Spark 1.2 has tiered pricing: $1.25/$4.25 per MTok on Meta's Model API (Standard tier shared with Muse Spark 1.3; cached input $0.15). Closed weights.

Is GPT-6 Astra or Muse Spark 1.2 cheaper for output?

Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper at $4.25 per million output tokens, against $50 for GPT-6 Astra — roughly 12× the price. Output tokens usually dominate a real bill, so weigh the output rate more heavily than the input rate. These are base rates; GPT-6 Astra has tiered pricing: Standard $10/$50 per MTok (≤272K input); above 272K input the whole request bills $20/$75. Cached input $1/MTok; cache writes $12.50 (1.25x input). Batch/Flex $5/$25. Fast mode costs 2x for up to 2x the speed ($20/$100 short context, $40/$150 long). Knowledge cutoff Apr 30 2026. Rolled out from 2026-09-03; Enterprise tenants get it disabled by default. Muse Spark 1.2 has tiered pricing: $1.25/$4.25 per MTok on Meta's Model API (Standard tier shared with Muse Spark 1.3; cached input $0.15). Closed weights.

Which has the larger context window, GPT-6 Astra or Muse Spark 1.2?

Both accept about 1.05M tokens of context, so document length will not decide between them.

Do GPT-6 Astra and Muse Spark 1.2 support the same reasoning levels?

GPT-6 Astra exposes low, medium, high, xhigh, max, while Muse Spark 1.2 exposes minimal, low, medium, high, xhigh, max.

Should I use GPT-6 Astra or Muse Spark 1.2?

Both sit in the frontier tier, so the choice usually comes down to price and context rather than capability. GPT-6 Astra suits computer-use agents; Muse Spark 1.2 suits frontier reasoning.

Next step

Choosing between them

The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.

Input price: Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 per 1M tokens versus $10 for GPT-6 Astra — a 8x difference at the headline tier.
Context: GPT-6 Astra takes 1.05M against 1.05M for Muse Spark 1.2 — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
Measured capability: GPT-6 Astra leads Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 52.7 to 39.6 (measured 2026-09-26).

Run the model picker Estimate stack cost All model comparisons

Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.