Skip to main content
AI Choice Engine
← Benchmark sources

livebench.ai · benchmark source

LiveBench

A contamination-aware suite that refreshes questions over time. Category and subtask views live on the source site.

Open livebench.ai1 board on this publisher

Fresh evaluation

LiveBench overall

A benchmark family designed to refresh questions and reduce contamination from training data.

Why it matters

Fresh tasks can provide a less stale view of reasoning and language performance.

Use it when

You want a current external signal alongside static benchmark suites.

The limitation

It still measures selected tasks and cannot predict your full workflow or tool integration.

Leaderboard snapshot

LiveBench overall results in a readable view

Use the tabs for the primary score and other published fields from this board. The source link remains authoritative for the live table.

The current public leaderboard does not expose an exact question-set release identifier, so these scores must not be aligned with results from another capture or release. 58 default-view rows captured 2026-10-01. Top: Claude Fable 5.1 Max Effort (83.4), Claude 5.5 Opus Thinking Max Effort (83.2), Claude Fable 5 Max Effort (83).

Leader among verified rows

Claude Fable 5.1 Max Effort

83.4%

Rows shown

58

Overall score

Source / snapshot date

2026-10-01

25 days old · not a live API feed

Open the live source before trusting rank order — especially when this snapshot predates recent model releases.

Score profile

Overall score by published row

Higher is better in this view

Claude Fable 5.1 Max Effort
83.4%
Claude 5.5 Opus Thinking Max Effort
83.2%
Claude Fable 5 Max Effort
83%
GPT-6 Astra Max Effort
82.2%
GPT-6.1 Sol Max Effort
81.6%
Muse Spark 1.3 xHigh Effort
81.6%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Max Effort
81.1%
GPT-5.6 Sol Max Effort
81%
GPT-5.5 Thinking xHigh Effort
80.2%
Claude 5 Opus Thinking Max Effort
80.1%
GPT-6 Sol Max Effort
79.3%
Kimi K3
79.2%
Gemini 3.7 Flash High
78.8%
Qwen 3.8 Max
78.5%
GPT-5.4 Thinking xHigh Effort
78%
Grok 4.6 xHigh
78%
Muse Spark 1.2 xHigh Effort
78%
GPT-5.6 Terra Max Effort
77.9%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 xHigh Effort
77.8%
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
77.4%
Grok 4.7 xHigh
77.4%
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview High
77%
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
76.8%
Claude 4.7 Opus Thinking xHigh Effort
76.5%
Claude 4.8 Opus Thinking Max Effort
76.2%
Qwen 3.8 Flash Next
76.2%
GLM-5.3
76.1%
Claude Sonnet 5 xHigh Effort
76%
Gemini 3.8 Flash High
75.8%
Grok 4.5
75.8%
Muse Spark 1.1 xHigh Effort
75.3%
Qwen3.8 27B
75.3%
Gemini 3.5 Flash High
74.6%
GPT-5.2 High
74.6%
Claude 4.6 Opus Thinking High Effort
74.5%
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
74.2%
GPT-5.2 Codex
74%
Gemini 3.6 Flash High
73.6%
GPT-5.6 Luna Max Effort
73.6%
GLM-5.2
73.2%
Qwen 3.7 Max
73.1%
Claude 4.6 Sonnet Thinking Medium Effort
73%
Claude 4.5 Opus Thinking High Effort
72.6%
GPT-6 Luna Max Effort
72%
Inkling xHigh Effort
71.9%
GLM-5.3 Flash
71.6%
Kimi K2.6 Thinking
70.5%
GPT-5.4 Nano xHigh
69.6%
ox-alpha-max
69.2%
Qwen 3.6 Plus
68.9%
Kimi K2.7 Code
68.4%
Grok Build 0.1
67.8%
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
67.4%
Minimax M3
67.3%
GPT-5.4 Mini xHigh
66.4%
Qwen 3.6 27B
64%
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite High
63.9%
Grok 4.3
62.3%

LiveBench overall table (58 models) captured 2026-10-01 from the live leaderboard's default view: overall and cost per successful task as the site displays them, finetunes hidden and effort variants collapsed to each model's best row. The source displays seven category averages but no exact question-set version in this capture. This capture date is not the evaluation/question-set date. LiveBench refreshes questions over time; scores without a shared exact question-set version are unaligned. Open the source for category/subtask detail.

Open LiveBench leaderboard

Evidence in this catalog

Where LiveBench overall fits

Closest verified examples we currently carry. A missing score is not a zero.

Model examples

  • Published source observation captured 2026-10-01. Source-specific result; no independent rerun or universal capability verdict.

  • Published source observation captured 2026-10-01. Source-specific result; no independent rerun or universal capability verdict.

  • Published source observation captured 2026-10-01. Source-specific result; no independent rerun or universal capability verdict.

Harness examples

No directly comparable harness score is verified here yet.

Open this board on LiveBench