Skip to main content
AI Choice Engine

Model comparison

GPT-6 Astra vs MiniMax M3

OpenAI against MiniMax, compared on context, price, and attributed benchmark results.

Recorded profile verification October 2, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Medium — see receipts below

OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra

Frontier

vs

MiniMax

MiniMax M3

Frontier · Open weights

AI model capability comparison
SpecificationGPT-6 AstraMiniMax M3
ProviderOpenAIMiniMax
TierFrontierFrontier
Context windowWinner: 1.05M1M
Max output128KNot verifiedUnverified
Input / 1M tokens$10Winner: $0.30
Output / 1M tokens$50Winner: $1.20
WeightsClosedOpen
ParametersNot verifiedUnverified428B total / 23B active (MoE)
Reasoning levelslow, medium, high, xhigh, maxNot verifiedUnverified
Modalitiestext, imagetext, image, video
LicenseNot verifiedUnverifiedMiniMax Community License
API model idgpt-6-astraMiniMax-M3
ReleasedSeptember 3, 2026June 1, 2026
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] · source date GPT-6 Astra: 2026-10-0153Not verifiedUnverified
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · source date MiniMax M3: 2026-10-01Not verifiedUnverified29
DeepSWE 1.1 · source date GPT-6 Astra: 2026-09-0374.1Not verifiedUnverified
OSWorld 2.0 (offline) · source date GPT-6 Astra: 2026-09-0372.6Not verifiedUnverified
GPQA Diamond · source date GPT-6 Astra: 2026-09-0396Not verifiedUnverified
Humanity's Last Exam · source date GPT-6 Astra: 2026-09-0357.2Not verifiedUnverified
Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date MiniMax M3: 2026-06-01Not verifiedUnverified66

Dates beside benchmark scores refer to the linked source’s publication or capture date unless that source explicitly states when it measured the result. A shared URL alone does not establish comparable runs; unverified setups are marked. Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.

Benchmark receipts

Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.

Pricing tiers

GPT-6 Astra: Standard $10/$50 per MTok (≤272K input); above 272K the full request bills $20/$75. Cached input $1/$2 and cache writes $12.50/$25 for short/long context. Batch/Flex are half Standard; Fast is 2x. Ultrafast is 6x: $60/$300 short, $120/$450 long, through Responses with global/US processing; no EU or other regional inference residency. Regional/FedRAMP processing adds 10% where eligible. Knowledge cutoff Apr 30 2026. Enterprise model access is disabled by default.

MiniMax M3: MiniMax Standard $0.30/$1.20 per MTok through 512K input; above 512K $0.60/$2.40. Cache reads $0.06/$0.12. Priority is 1.5x the applicable Standard rate. The page labels these current rates permanent 50% off; future tariffs are not established. Subscription-key Credits/M Plan and PAYG balance are separate.

FrontierRecord checked October 1, 2026

GPT-6 Astra

OpenAI describes GPT-6 Astra as its most capable model for complex reasoning, coding and computer use, and the first it gates at the Preparedness Framework's 'Critical' cybersecurity threshold.

Best for

  • Computer-use agents
  • Agentic coding
  • Hard reasoning

Watch out

OpenAI places Astra at its Critical cybersecurity threshold and disables it by default for Enterprise. Tool calling requires Responses; none reasoning and custom temperature/top_p/logprobs are unsupported. Long prompts above 272K increase the full-request rate. GPT-6.1 Sol has lower base token prices; compare results on your own workload.

FrontierOpen weightsRecord checked October 2, 2026

MiniMax M3

MiniMax M3 is an open-weight (community license) 428B MoE with native multimodal and 1M context.

Best for

  • Open-weight deployments
  • Multimodal
  • Long-context

Watch out

Commercial checkpoint use requires Built with MiniMax M3 attribution and a one-time notice at or below $20M yearly revenue from the relevant products/services; above that threshold prior written authorization is required. Keep copyright/permission notices and follow prohibited-use terms. The checkpoint documents enabled/adaptive/disabled thinking. Hosted OpenAI compatibility defaults thinking on; Anthropic compatibility defaults it off and enables it with adaptive. Preview effort levels do not apply to M3. A hard output cap remains unverified.

Benchmark

DeepSWE 1.1 in context

Only GPT-6 Astra has a published DeepSWE 1.1 result. It is shown against the wider field, with cost per completed task alongside the score.

Local leader

GPT-6 Astra [xhigh]

74.1%

Rows shown

28

Best source-matched Pass@1 per model

Snapshot date

2026-10-01

Mirrored from deepswe.datacurve.ai

DeepSWE 1.1 pass@10%16%32%48%64%80%$0$4.50$9.00$13.50$18.00$22.50$27.00Avg cost per taskGPT-6 Astra [xhigh]: 74.1% · $4.43 · 30k tokens · 29 stepsGemini 3.8 Flash [high]: 73.8% · $2.36 · 143k tokens · 166 stepsClaude Opus 5 [max]: 73.6% · $11.84 · 118k tokens · 99 stepsGPT-5.6 Sol [max]: 72.7% · $8.39 · 60k tokens · 61 stepsClaude Fable 5 [xhigh]: 69.9% · $13.41 · 80k tokens · 68 stepsGPT-5.6 Terra [max]: 69.6% · $4.95 · 72k tokens · 76 stepsGLM 5.3 [max]: 69.0% · $3.99 · 80k tokens · 124 stepsKimi K3 [max]: 68.5% · $4.65 · 82k tokens · 98 stepsGrok 4.6 [medium]: 67.5% · $3.45 · 50k tokens · 70 stepsGPT-5.6 Luna [max]: 67.2% · $3.03 · 73k tokens · 102 stepsGPT-5.5 [xhigh]: 67.0% · $7.23 · 46k tokens · 82 stepsGemini 3.7 Flash [medium]: 65.5% · $2.03 · 94k tokens · 117 stepsGLM 5.3 Flash [max]: 63.4% · $0.48 · 73k tokens · 123 stepsDeepSeek V4-Pro [max]: 62.8% · $0.24 · 106k tokens · 155 stepsClaude Opus 4.8 [max]: 59.0% · $13.22 · 135k tokens · 120 stepsQwen3.8-Max [xhigh]: 57.5% · $3.73 · 95k tokens · 111 stepsMuse Spark 1.2 [xhigh]: 54.9% · $3.70 · 99k tokens · 101 stepsClaude Sonnet 5 [max]: 53.8% · $26.40 · 214k tokens · 268 stepsGrok 4.5 [high]: 53.8% · $2.42 · 36k tokens · 61 stepsDeepSeek V4-Flash [max]: 53.3% · $0.10 · 108k tokens · 153 stepsMuse Spark 1.1 [xhigh]: 53.3% · $2.36 · 74k tokens · 96 stepsGPT-5.4 [xhigh]: 51.8% · $5.65 · 71k tokens · 70 stepsGemini 3.6 Flash [high]: 46.7% · $4.42 · 96k tokens · 117 stepsGLM 5.2 [max]: 43.8% · $3.92 · 78k tokens · 129 stepsGemini 3.5 Flash [high]: 36.1% · $3.45 · 76k tokens · 105 stepsKimi K2.7 Code: 30.5% · $2.82 · 59k tokens · 149 stepsClaude Sonnet 4.6 [high]: 29.9% · $5.52 · 76k tokens · 134 stepsGemini 3.1 Pro [high]: 11.7% · $2.14 · 28k tokens · 76 steps

Better is toward the top-right (higher pass rate, lower cost). X-axis is reversed to match DeepSWE’s public chart. v1.1 uses average cost, output tokens and steps. Legacy v1 transcriptions are excluded here until an exact primary receipt is retained.

DeepSWE 1.1 leaderboard with pass rate, cost, tokens, and steps per task
#ModelPass@1Cost / taskTokens / taskSteps / task
1GPT-6 Astra [xhigh]74.1%$4.4330k29
2Gemini 3.8 Flash [high]73.8%$2.36143k166
3Claude Opus 5 [max]73.6%$11.84118k99
4GPT-5.6 Sol [max]72.7%$8.3960k61
5Claude Fable 5 [xhigh]69.9%$13.4180k68
6GPT-5.6 Terra [max]69.6%$4.9572k76
7GLM 5.3 [max]69.0%$3.9980k124
8Kimi K3 [max]68.5%$4.6582k98
9Grok 4.6 [medium]67.5%$3.4550k70
10GPT-5.6 Luna [max]67.2%$3.0373k102
11GPT-5.5 [xhigh]67.0%$7.2346k82
12Gemini 3.7 Flash [medium]65.5%$2.0394k117
13GLM 5.3 Flash [max]63.4%$0.4873k123
14DeepSeek V4-Pro [max]62.8%$0.24106k155
15Claude Opus 4.8 [max]59.0%$13.22135k120
16Qwen3.8-Max [xhigh]57.5%$3.7395k111
17Muse Spark 1.2 [xhigh]54.9%$3.7099k101
18Claude Sonnet 5 [max]53.8%$26.40214k268
19Grok 4.5 [high]53.8%$2.4236k61
20DeepSeek V4-Flash [max]53.3%$0.10108k153
21Muse Spark 1.1 [xhigh]53.3%$2.3674k96
22GPT-5.4 [xhigh]51.8%$5.6571k70
23Gemini 3.6 Flash [high]46.7%$4.4296k117
24GLM 5.2 [max]43.8%$3.9278k129
25Gemini 3.5 Flash [high]36.1%$3.4576k105
26Kimi K2.7 Code30.5%$2.8259k149
27Claude Sonnet 4.6 [high]29.9%$5.5276k134
28Gemini 3.1 Pro [high]11.7%$2.1428k76

“Best per model” shows each model’s highest source-matched Pass@1 in this capture; switch to all effort levels to see every retained configuration. Efforts differ across models, so this view is not a comparison at matched effort. The source was generated September 22 and captured October 1. Small gaps may not be statistically meaningful — confirm on deepswe.datacurve.ai.

When the cheaper one wins

MiniMax M3 is cheaper on output at $1.20 per million tokens against $50 for GPT-6 Astra — about 42×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. This compares standard short-context token rates, not total cost per accepted task. Include input, cache, context tiers, schedules, retries and review in your pilot.

Run the model picker

Evidence confidence: Medium

How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.

  • Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
  • 2/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: max output, parameter count, reasoning levels.
  • No directly aligned benchmark setup — No benchmark has matching cited sources, source dates, units, effort and recorded run details on both models.
  • Verified within the last 90 days — Older of the two catalog checks was 25 days ago.
  • Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.

Source receipts

Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.

Common questions

GPT-6 Astra vs MiniMax M3

Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.

Is GPT-6 Astra or MiniMax M3 cheaper for input?
MiniMax M3 is cheaper at $0.30 per million input tokens, against $10 for GPT-6 Astra — roughly 33× the price. Estimate both input and output token volume for your workload. These are base rates; GPT-6 Astra: Standard $10/$50 per MTok (≤272K input); above 272K the full request bills $20/$75. Cached input $1/$2 and cache writes $12.50/$25 for short/long context. Batch/Flex are half Standard; Fast is 2x. Ultrafast is 6x: $60/$300 short, $120/$450 long, through Responses with global/US processing; no EU or other regional inference residency. Regional/FedRAMP processing adds 10% where eligible. Knowledge cutoff Apr 30 2026. Enterprise model access is disabled by default. MiniMax M3: MiniMax Standard $0.30/$1.20 per MTok through 512K input; above 512K $0.60/$2.40. Cache reads $0.06/$0.12. Priority is 1.5x the applicable Standard rate. The page labels these current rates permanent 50% off; future tariffs are not established. Subscription-key Credits/M Plan and PAYG balance are separate.
Is GPT-6 Astra or MiniMax M3 cheaper for output?
MiniMax M3 is cheaper at $1.20 per million output tokens, against $50 for GPT-6 Astra — roughly 42× the price. Estimate both input and output token volume for your workload. These are base rates; GPT-6 Astra: Standard $10/$50 per MTok (≤272K input); above 272K the full request bills $20/$75. Cached input $1/$2 and cache writes $12.50/$25 for short/long context. Batch/Flex are half Standard; Fast is 2x. Ultrafast is 6x: $60/$300 short, $120/$450 long, through Responses with global/US processing; no EU or other regional inference residency. Regional/FedRAMP processing adds 10% where eligible. Knowledge cutoff Apr 30 2026. Enterprise model access is disabled by default. MiniMax M3: MiniMax Standard $0.30/$1.20 per MTok through 512K input; above 512K $0.60/$2.40. Cache reads $0.06/$0.12. Priority is 1.5x the applicable Standard rate. The page labels these current rates permanent 50% off; future tariffs are not established. Subscription-key Credits/M Plan and PAYG balance are separate.
Which has the larger context window, GPT-6 Astra or MiniMax M3?
GPT-6 Astra accepts 1.05M tokens against 1M for MiniMax M3. This only matters if you routinely send very long documents or large codebases.
Should I use GPT-6 Astra or MiniMax M3?
Both are classified in our frontier tier; this editorial grouping does not imply equal capability. GPT-6 Astra is a candidate for computer-use agents; MiniMax M3 is a candidate for open-weight deployments. Compare accuracy, tool reliability, latency and cost on representative tasks.
Can I self-host GPT-6 Astra or MiniMax M3?
MiniMax M3 publishes open weights, but self-hosting and third-party provider access depend on the licence, hardware, serving support, and availability. GPT-6 Astra is a closed model whose supported access paths are controlled by its provider.

Next step

Choosing between them

The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.

  • Input price: MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 per 1M tokens versus $10 for GPT-6 Astra — a 33.3x difference at the headline tier.
  • Context: GPT-6 Astra takes 1.05M against 1M for MiniMax M3 — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
  • Deployment: MiniMax M3 publishes weights you can self-host; the other is API-only.

Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.