Model comparison
GPT-6 Astra vs MiniMax M3
OpenAI against MiniMax, compared on context, price, and attributed benchmark results.
Recorded profile verification October 2, 2026Individual provider fields may changeEvidence confidence: Medium — see receipts below
OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra
Frontier
MiniMax
MiniMax M3
Frontier · Open weights
| Specification | GPT-6 Astra | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Provider | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Tier | ||
| Tier | Frontier | Frontier |
| Context window | ||
| Context window | Winner: 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | ||
| Max output | 128K | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Input / 1M tokens | ||
| Input / 1M tokens | $10 | Winner: $0.30 |
| Output / 1M tokens | ||
| Output / 1M tokens | $50 | Winner: $1.20 |
| Weights | ||
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Parameters | ||
| Parameters | Not verifiedUnverified | 428B total / 23B active (MoE) |
| Reasoning levels | ||
| Reasoning levels | low, medium, high, xhigh, max | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Modalities | ||
| Modalities | text, image | text, image, video |
| License | ||
| License | Not verifiedUnverified | MiniMax Community License |
| API model id | ||
| API model id | gpt-6-astra | MiniMax-M3 |
| Released | ||
| Released | September 3, 2026 | June 1, 2026 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] · source date GPT-6 Astra: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index [max] · source date GPT-6 Astra: 2026-10-01 | 53 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · source date MiniMax M3: 2026-10-01 | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · source date MiniMax M3: 2026-10-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 29 |
| DeepSWE 1.1 · source date GPT-6 Astra: 2026-09-03 | ||
| DeepSWE 1.1 · source date GPT-6 Astra: 2026-09-03 | 74.1 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| OSWorld 2.0 (offline) · source date GPT-6 Astra: 2026-09-03 | ||
| OSWorld 2.0 (offline) · source date GPT-6 Astra: 2026-09-03 | 72.6 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| GPQA Diamond · source date GPT-6 Astra: 2026-09-03 | ||
| GPQA Diamond · source date GPT-6 Astra: 2026-09-03 | 96 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date GPT-6 Astra: 2026-09-03 | ||
| Humanity's Last Exam · source date GPT-6 Astra: 2026-09-03 | 57.2 | Not verifiedUnverified |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date MiniMax M3: 2026-06-01 | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 · source date MiniMax M3: 2026-06-01 | Not verifiedUnverified | 66 |
Dates beside benchmark scores refer to the linked source’s publication or capture date unless that source explicitly states when it measured the result. A shared URL alone does not establish comparable runs; unverified setups are marked. Prices are USD per million tokens at standard rates, excluding batch and caching discounts. Values we could not confirm from the provider are shown as “Not verified” rather than estimated.
Benchmark receipts
Where each score comes from, and how far it can be compared across models.
- Source date2026-10-01Artificial Analysis (MiniMax-M3)
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check the cited source and its date.
- Source date2026-10-01Artificial Analysis (GPT-6 Astra (max))
Composite index blending reasoning, knowledge, and coding evals into one 0–100 score.
Comparable with caveatOnly same-version scores are comparable. v4.3.2 was rebaselined (the top score fell from 66 on v4.1.1 to ~58), so v4.1.1 figures must not be compared with v4.3.2 figures — check the cited source and its date.
- Source date2026-09-03OpenAI GPT-6 Astra evaluation table (vendor-reported, with tools; maximum across evaluated efforts)
Frontier-knowledge ceiling: extremely hard multi-domain questions written to be near-impossible without deep expertise.
Comparable with caveatSubset/tool configurations (text-only vs with-tools) differ between vendors and materially change scores; must match configuration to compare.
- Source date2026-09-03OpenAI GPT-6 Astra evaluation table (vendor-reported; maximum across evaluated efforts)
Graduate-level science reasoning: multiple-choice questions written by domain PhDs.
Comparable with caveatDo not treat a fixed two-point band as universal measurement uncertainty; it depends on run count and evaluation setup. Chain-of-thought, prompt, and tool policy must match. The small pool limits fine-grained conclusions, and frontier scores can be near ceiling; Artificial Analysis dropped it from its Intelligence Index in v4.3.
- Source date2026-09-03OpenAI (vendor-reported) (v2026.08.08 offline set, partial reward; vendor research/API evaluation, maximum across evaluated efforts)
Computer-use: completing real OS tasks (files, apps, settings) in a sandboxed desktop.
Comparable with caveatOffline vs live interaction modes are NOT comparable; step budgets and screen resolution must match.
- Source date2026-09-03OpenAI (xhigh, mini-swe-agent; matches Datacurve's independent board (74.1% at $4.43/task, rank 1; board updated 2026-09-22))
Agentic software engineering: pass@1 on real repo tasks with reported cost per completed task.
Directly comparable
- Source date2026-06-01MiniMax vendor report: Terminus2, 8CPU/16GB sandbox, 2h, 128K generation budget; budget is not an API cap
Agentic terminal work: multi-step tasks executed in a sandboxed shell environment.
Comparable with caveatNot comparable with Terminal-Bench 3.0 or 4.0 (different task sets) or v1; harness configuration (container, time limits) also shifts results.
Pricing tiers
GPT-6 Astra: Standard $10/$50 per MTok (≤272K input); above 272K the full request bills $20/$75. Cached input $1/$2 and cache writes $12.50/$25 for short/long context. Batch/Flex are half Standard; Fast is 2x. Ultrafast is 6x: $60/$300 short, $120/$450 long, through Responses with global/US processing; no EU or other regional inference residency. Regional/FedRAMP processing adds 10% where eligible. Knowledge cutoff Apr 30 2026. Enterprise model access is disabled by default.
MiniMax M3: MiniMax Standard $0.30/$1.20 per MTok through 512K input; above 512K $0.60/$2.40. Cache reads $0.06/$0.12. Priority is 1.5x the applicable Standard rate. The page labels these current rates permanent 50% off; future tariffs are not established. Subscription-key Credits/M Plan and PAYG balance are separate.
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI describes GPT-6 Astra as its most capable model for complex reasoning, coding and computer use, and the first it gates at the Preparedness Framework's 'Critical' cybersecurity threshold.
Best for
- Computer-use agents
- Agentic coding
- Hard reasoning
Watch out
OpenAI places Astra at its Critical cybersecurity threshold and disables it by default for Enterprise. Tool calling requires Responses; none reasoning and custom temperature/top_p/logprobs are unsupported. Long prompts above 272K increase the full-request rate. GPT-6.1 Sol has lower base token prices; compare results on your own workload.
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 is an open-weight (community license) 428B MoE with native multimodal and 1M context.
Best for
- Open-weight deployments
- Multimodal
- Long-context
Watch out
Commercial checkpoint use requires Built with MiniMax M3 attribution and a one-time notice at or below $20M yearly revenue from the relevant products/services; above that threshold prior written authorization is required. Keep copyright/permission notices and follow prohibited-use terms. The checkpoint documents enabled/adaptive/disabled thinking. Hosted OpenAI compatibility defaults thinking on; Anthropic compatibility defaults it off and enables it with adaptive. Preview effort levels do not apply to M3. A hard output cap remains unverified.
Benchmark
DeepSWE 1.1 in context
Only GPT-6 Astra has a published DeepSWE 1.1 result. It is shown against the wider field, with cost per completed task alongside the score.
Local leader
GPT-6 Astra [xhigh]
74.1%
Rows shown
28
Best source-matched Pass@1 per model
Snapshot date
2026-10-01
Mirrored from deepswe.datacurve.ai
Better is toward the top-right (higher pass rate, lower cost). X-axis is reversed to match DeepSWE’s public chart. v1.1 uses average cost, output tokens and steps. Legacy v1 transcriptions are excluded here until an exact primary receipt is retained.
| # | Model | Pass@1 | Cost / task | Tokens / task | Steps / task |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Astra [xhigh] | 74.1% | $4.43 | 30k | 29 |
| 2 | Gemini 3.8 Flash [high] | 73.8% | $2.36 | 143k | 166 |
| 3 | Claude Opus 5 [max] | 73.6% | $11.84 | 118k | 99 |
| 4 | GPT-5.6 Sol [max] | 72.7% | $8.39 | 60k | 61 |
| 5 | Claude Fable 5 [xhigh] | 69.9% | $13.41 | 80k | 68 |
| 6 | GPT-5.6 Terra [max] | 69.6% | $4.95 | 72k | 76 |
| 7 | GLM 5.3 [max] | 69.0% | $3.99 | 80k | 124 |
| 8 | Kimi K3 [max] | 68.5% | $4.65 | 82k | 98 |
| 9 | Grok 4.6 [medium] | 67.5% | $3.45 | 50k | 70 |
| 10 | GPT-5.6 Luna [max] | 67.2% | $3.03 | 73k | 102 |
| 11 | GPT-5.5 [xhigh] | 67.0% | $7.23 | 46k | 82 |
| 12 | Gemini 3.7 Flash [medium] | 65.5% | $2.03 | 94k | 117 |
| 13 | GLM 5.3 Flash [max] | 63.4% | $0.48 | 73k | 123 |
| 14 | DeepSeek V4-Pro [max] | 62.8% | $0.24 | 106k | 155 |
| 15 | Claude Opus 4.8 [max] | 59.0% | $13.22 | 135k | 120 |
| 16 | Qwen3.8-Max [xhigh] | 57.5% | $3.73 | 95k | 111 |
| 17 | Muse Spark 1.2 [xhigh] | 54.9% | $3.70 | 99k | 101 |
| 18 | Claude Sonnet 5 [max] | 53.8% | $26.40 | 214k | 268 |
| 19 | Grok 4.5 [high] | 53.8% | $2.42 | 36k | 61 |
| 20 | DeepSeek V4-Flash [max] | 53.3% | $0.10 | 108k | 153 |
| 21 | Muse Spark 1.1 [xhigh] | 53.3% | $2.36 | 74k | 96 |
| 22 | GPT-5.4 [xhigh] | 51.8% | $5.65 | 71k | 70 |
| 23 | Gemini 3.6 Flash [high] | 46.7% | $4.42 | 96k | 117 |
| 24 | GLM 5.2 [max] | 43.8% | $3.92 | 78k | 129 |
| 25 | Gemini 3.5 Flash [high] | 36.1% | $3.45 | 76k | 105 |
| 26 | Kimi K2.7 Code | 30.5% | $2.82 | 59k | 149 |
| 27 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 [high] | 29.9% | $5.52 | 76k | 134 |
| 28 | Gemini 3.1 Pro [high] | 11.7% | $2.14 | 28k | 76 |
“Best per model” shows each model’s highest source-matched Pass@1 in this capture; switch to all effort levels to see every retained configuration. Efforts differ across models, so this view is not a comparison at matched effort. The source was generated September 22 and captured October 1. Small gaps may not be statistically meaningful — confirm on deepswe.datacurve.ai.
When the cheaper one wins
MiniMax M3 is cheaper on output at $1.20 per million tokens against $50 for GPT-6 Astra — about 42×. Use the cheaper tier for classification, extraction, summarisation, and any task where the expensive model’s extra score does not change the accepted output. The expensive one only pays if your hardest task actually fails on the cheap tier. This compares standard short-context token rates, not total cost per accepted task. Include input, cache, context tiers, schedules, retries and review in your pilot.
Run the model pickerEvidence confidence: Medium
How strong and complete the evidence behind this comparison is — not a prediction of which model is better.
- Pricing verified on both sides — Input and output rates are verified for both models.
- 2/5 core specs verified on both sides — Not published for at least one side: max output, parameter count, reasoning levels.
- No directly aligned benchmark setup — No benchmark has matching cited sources, source dates, units, effort and recorded run details on both models.
- Verified within the last 90 days — Older of the two catalog checks was 25 days ago.
- Both models carry source citations — Each side has at least two catalog sources on record.
Source receipts
Each catalog figure was checked against the provider or an independent second source on the date shown.
- GPT-6 Astra: OpenAI model card — whole-profile source check October 1 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- GPT-6 Astra: OpenAI current API pricing and processing tiers (accessed 2026-10-01)
- GPT-6 Astra: OpenAI API changelog — September 3 release; checked October 1 (accessed 2026-10-01)
- GPT-6 Astra: OpenAI — Introducing GPT-6 Astra (accessed 2026-09-03)
- GPT-6 Astra: OpenAI API pricing (gpt-6-astra $10/$50) (accessed 2026-09-03)
- GPT-6 Astra: CNBC — OpenAI launches GPT-6 Astra (accessed 2026-09-03)
- GPT-6 Astra: OpenAI model docs — gpt-6-astra (128K max output, effort levels) (accessed 2026-09-05)
- GPT-6 Astra: OpenAI API pricing (gpt-6-astra ≤272K $10/$50, >272K $20/$75) (accessed 2026-09-26)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — Pay as You Go - MiniMax API Docs (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — Models - MiniMax API Docs (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — Model Invocation - MiniMax API Docs (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — OpenAI SDK - MiniMax API Docs (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — Anthropic SDK - MiniMax API Docs (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M3 · Hugging Face (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — LICENSE · MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M3 at main (accessed 2026-10-01)
- MiniMax M3: MiniMax — MiniMax M3: Frontier Coding, 1M Context, Native Multimodality — All in One Model - MiniMax Research (accessed 2026-10-01)
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiniMax M3
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax M3
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs MiniMax M3
Diving deeper on one model? GPT-6 Astra · MiniMax M3
Common questions
GPT-6 Astra vs MiniMax M3
Answered from the verified figures on this page rather than general guidance.
Is GPT-6 Astra or MiniMax M3 cheaper for input?
Is GPT-6 Astra or MiniMax M3 cheaper for output?
Which has the larger context window, GPT-6 Astra or MiniMax M3?
Should I use GPT-6 Astra or MiniMax M3?
Can I self-host GPT-6 Astra or MiniMax M3?
Next step
Choosing between them
The verified figures that separate this pair, computed from the catalog rather than restated boilerplate.
- Input price: MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 per 1M tokens versus $10 for GPT-6 Astra — a 33.3x difference at the headline tier.
- Context: GPT-6 Astra takes 1.05M against 1M for MiniMax M3 — only decisive if your prompts approach the smaller window.
- Deployment: MiniMax M3 publishes weights you can self-host; the other is API-only.
Choosing a harness rather than a model — Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Lovable? Compare agentic harnesses · Latest releases.